Control of pattern duplication in the retinotectal system of Xenopus. Suppression of duplication by eye-fragment interactions.

Abstract Recombining right nasal half-eyes with left temporal half-eyes at embryonic stage 32 in Xenopus produces a double or “twinned” pattern of functional connections between retina and midbrain optic tectum. The left temporal half-eye is reprogrammed such that it projects to the tectum as a mirror-image duplicate pattern of the nasal right half-eye; both half-eyes project across the entire tectum. However, recombining a right nasal half-eye (in situ) with a right dorsal half-eye (grafted into the temporal position; NRDR eye) produces a single normal retinotectal projection. Where interactions between NR and TL involve both axial reprogramming and duplication of NR positional values in TL, NRDR interactions involve axial reprogramming in DR without duplication of NR values. In a second approach to interactions which suppress pattern duplication, both nasal and temporal one-third-sized eye fragments form approximate “NN” or “TT” duplicate pattern maps, respectively, when either is allowed to round up and form a whole eye. Allowing nasal and temporal thirds to permanently fuse (after removal of a one-third-sized vertical center strip of retina at stage 32) produces a normal projection; allowing the nasal and temporal thirds to interact (fuse) for 35–40 hr, followed by removal of one or the other third, suppresses pattern duplication (produces normal maps) in the remaining third in a majority of cases. Allowing the thirds to interact for 18–30 hr before removal of the temporal third produces a majority result of partial duplication in the remaining nasal third. Partial duplicates are apparent spatial intermediates with regard to interactions which suppress duplication in either fragment type.

[1]  M. Jacobson Cessation of DNA synthesis in retinal ganglion cells correlated with the time of specification of their central conections. , 1968, Developmental biology.

[2]  M. Jacobson Development of neuronal specificity in retinal ganglion cells of Xenopus. , 1968, Developmental biology.

[3]  R. Hunt,et al.  Patterning of neuronal locus specificities in retinal ganglion cells after partial extirpation of the embryonic eye , 1975 .

[4]  H. Meinhardt,et al.  Applications of a theory of biological pattern formation based on lateral inhibition. , 1974, Journal of cell science.

[5]  Lewis Wolpert,et al.  Chapter 6 Positional Information and Pattern Formation , 1971 .

[6]  R. M. Gaze,et al.  The retinotectal projection from a double-ventral compound eye in Xenopus laevis. , 1974, Journal of embryology and experimental morphology.

[7]  Roger W. Sperry,et al.  OPTIC NERVE REGENERATION WITH RETURN OF VISION IN ANURANS , 1944 .

[8]  R. M. Gaze,et al.  The retinotectal projections after uncrossing the optic chiasma in Xenopus with one compound eye. , 1971, Journal of embryology and experimental morphology.

[9]  Keating Mj The role of visual function in the patterning of binocular visual connexions. , 1974 .

[10]  S. Bryant Regenerative failure of double half limbs in Notophthalmus viridescens , 1976, Nature.

[11]  R. M. Gaze,et al.  The Visual System and “Neuronal Specificity” , 1972, Nature.

[12]  P. Bryant Regeneration and duplication in imaginal discs. , 1975, Ciba Foundation symposium.

[13]  R K Hunt,et al.  Specification of positional information in retinal ganglion cells of Xenopus: stability of the specified state. , 1972, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[14]  R. Hunt,et al.  Development of neuronal locus specificity in Xenopus retinal ganglion cells after surgical eye transection after fusion of whole eyes. , 1974, Developmental biology.

[15]  R. M. Gaze,et al.  On the formation of connexions by compound eyes in Xenopus , 1965, The Journal of physiology.

[16]  G. Schubiger Regeneration, duplication and transdetermination in fragments of the leg disc of Drosophila melanogaster. , 1971, Developmental biology.

[17]  A polar co-ordinate system for positional information in the vertebrate neural retina , 1977 .

[18]  R. M. Gaze,et al.  The growth of the retina in Xenopus laevis: an autoradiographic study. , 1971, Journal of embryology and experimental morphology.

[19]  R. Hunt,et al.  Chapter 7 Neuronal Specificity Revisited , 1974 .

[20]  R. M. Gaze,et al.  The retinotectal projection from a double-ventral compound eye in Xenopus. , 1971, The Journal of physiology.

[21]  S Goldberg,et al.  The invisible ocular map. , 1976, Bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine.

[22]  Peter J. Bryant,et al.  Wound healing in the imaginal discs of Drosophila. I. Scanning electron microscopy of normal and healing wing discs. , 1977, Developmental biology.

[23]  Extent and properties of the regeneration field in the larval legs of cockroaches (Leucophaea maderae). II. Confirmation by transplantation experiments. , 1974, Journal of embryology and experimental morphology.

[24]  V. French,et al.  Pattern regulation in epimorphic fields. , 1976, Science.

[25]  R. M. Gaze,et al.  The development of half‐eyes in Xenopus tadpoles , 1975 .

[26]  V. French,et al.  Biological regeneration and pattern formation. , 1977, Scientific American.

[27]  H. Bohn Extent and properties of the regeneration field in the larval legs of cockroaches (Leucophaea maderae). I. Extirpation experiments. , 1974, Journal of embryology and experimental morphology.

[28]  J. Hollyfield Differential growth of the neural retina in Xenopus laevis larvae. , 1971, Developmental biology.

[29]  R. Hunt,et al.  Neuronal locus specificity: trans-repolarization of Xenopus embryonic retina after the time of axial specification. , 1975, Science.

[30]  R. M. Gaze,et al.  The retino‐tectal projection in Xenopus with compound eyes , 1963, The Journal of physiology.

[31]  R. Hunt,et al.  Visual projections to the optic tecta in Xenopus after partial extirpation of the embryonic eye , 1975 .

[32]  M. Jacobson Histogenesis of retina in the clawed frog with implications for the pattern of development of retinotectal connections , 1976, Brain Research.

[33]  E. C. Zeeman,et al.  A clock and wavefront model for control of the number of repeated structures during animal morphogenesis. , 1976, Journal of theoretical biology.

[34]  Developmental programming for retinotectal patterns. , 1975, Ciba Foundation symposium.

[35]  J. Faber,et al.  Normal Table of Xenopus Laevis (Daudin) , 1958 .

[36]  Roger W. Sperry,et al.  RESTORATION OF VISION AFTER CROSSING OF OPTIC NERVES AND AFTER CONTRALATERAL TRANSPLANTATION OF EYE , 1945 .