Developing a CO 2 -e Accounting Method for Quantification and Analysis of Embodied Carbon in High-Rise Buildings

Abstract Considerable amounts of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions in buildings are embodied carbon from the manufacturing processes and transportation of various construction materials. Reduction of embodied carbon in buildings becomes important in the context of limiting GHG emissions into atmosphere. However, previous studies focused on analysis of low-rise buildings while high-rise buildings were seldom evaluated. Therefore, this study aims to develop a method used for the quantification and analysis of embodied carbon in high-rise buildings. The proposed method is used to evaluate the impacts of different procurement strategies (e.g., the choice of material manufacturing processes, the amounts of recycled steel scrap and cement substitutes, and the source locations), based on a case study of embodied carbon for a 60-story composite core-outrigger reference building (i.e., the most commonly-used structure in high-rise building design). The results show that structural steel and rebar from traditional blast furnace account for 80% of the embodied carbon in the core-outrigger building, while ready-mixed concrete contributes only 20%. If steel is produced from electric arc furnace with 100% recycled steel scrap as the feedstock, the embodied carbon of the building can be reduced by over 60%. As for ready-mixed concrete, 10–20% embodied carbon reduction in buildings can be achieved by utilizing cement substitutes (35% fly ash or 75% slag). However, using concrete with large amounts of cement substitutes has longer setting periods and affects the construction time. In projects with strict construction schedules, contractors may use less cement substitutes, leading to increased embodied carbon emissions in buildings. When large amounts of recycled steel and cement substitutes are used in construction, the carbon emissions from transportation can increase up to 20% of the embodied carbon in a building. In such cases, a trade-off analysis considering both the embodied carbon and the material availability is needed in order to determine the optimal source locations.

[1]  Jack Chin Pang Cheng,et al.  A Systematic Approach for Low Carbon Concrete Mix Design and Production , 2015 .

[2]  Arpad Horvath,et al.  Life-Cycle Environmental Effects of an Office Building , 2003 .

[3]  Young Sang Cho,et al.  LCA application in the optimum design of high rise steel structures , 2012 .

[4]  Lei Zhang,et al.  Greenhouse gas emissions in building construction: A case study of One Peking in Hong Kong , 2010 .

[5]  Brent Stephens,et al.  Life-Cycle Energy Implications of Downtown High-Rise vs. Suburban Low-Rise Living: An Overview and Quantitative Case Study for Chicago , 2015 .

[6]  Yuichi Moriguchi,et al.  CO2 in the iron and steel industry: an analysis of Japanese emission reduction potentials , 2002 .

[7]  Wei Pan,et al.  Challenges for modeling carbon emissions of high-rise public residential buildings in Hong Kong , 2015 .

[8]  Siriluk Chiarakorn,et al.  Energy and carbon dioxide intensity of Thailand's steel industry and greenhouse gas emission projection toward the year 2050 , 2014 .

[9]  Nikola Anastasijevic,et al.  Low CO2 emission technologies for iron and steelmaking as well as titania slag production , 2007 .

[10]  Anjana Das,et al.  Iron and steel manufacturing technologies in India: estimation of CO2 emission , 1997 .

[11]  R. Betts,et al.  Changes in Atmospheric Constituents and in Radiative Forcing. Chapter 2 , 2007 .

[12]  Zongjin Li.  Advanced Concrete Technology , 2011 .

[13]  Arpad Horvath,et al.  Comparison of Environmental Effects of Steel- and Concrete-Framed Buildings , 2005 .

[14]  Gregory A. Keoleian,et al.  Life cycle energy and environmental performance of a new university building: modeling challenges and design implications , 2003 .

[15]  L. J. Ren,et al.  Analysis of Existing Problems and Carbon Emission Reduction in Shandong's Iron and Steel Industry , 2011 .

[16]  Andrew Minson,et al.  Sustainable Concrete Solutions , 2014 .

[17]  Ali Akbarnezhad,et al.  Comparative Analysis of Embodied Carbon Associated with Alternative Structural Systems , 2015 .

[18]  Bassam A. Burgan,et al.  Sustainable steel construction , 2006 .

[19]  Stefan Pauliuk,et al.  The roles of energy and material efficiency in meeting steel industry CO2 targets. , 2013, Environmental science & technology.

[20]  Laura C. Draucker,et al.  Greenhouse Gas Protocol Product Life Cycle Accounting and Reporting Standard , 2011 .

[21]  Shabbir H. Gheewala,et al.  Environmental life cycle assessment of a commercial office building in Thailand , 2008 .

[22]  Leif Gustavsson,et al.  Life cycle primary energy use and carbon emission of an eight-storey wood-framed apartment building , 2010 .

[23]  Vivian W. Y Tam,et al.  Material wastage in construction activities – a Hong Kong survey , 2002 .

[24]  Jørgen Westrum Thorsen.  Improving the Representation of Maritime Transport in the EXIOBASE MRIO Dataset , 2013 .

[25]  Kyoung Sun Moon,et al.  Structural Developments in Tall Buildings: Current Trends and Future Prospects , 2007 .

[26]  Dario Trabucco.  Life Cycle Energy Analysis of Tall Buildings: Design Principles , 2011 .

[27]  Michael D. Lepech,et al.  Application of life-cycle assessment to early stage building design for reduced embodied environmental impacts , 2013 .

[28]  Mia Ala-Juusela,et al.  Buildings and Climate Change: Summary for Decision-Makers , 2009 .

[29]  J. Burnett,et al.  Analysis of embodied energy use in the residential building of Hong Kong , 2001 .

[30]  Aie,et al.  Tracking Industrial Energy Efficiency and CO2 Emissions , 2007 .

[31]  M Thomas,et al.  Optimizing the Use of Fly Ash in Concrete , 2007 .

[32]  巢志成,et al.  Life Cycle Inventory for Steel in Taiwan , 2001 .

[33]  A. Horvath,et al.  Life-Cycle Assessment of Office Buildings in Europe and the United States , 2006 .