Dual Task Demands On Encoding And Retrieval Processes: Evidence From Healthy Adult Ageing

Previous studies of dual-task performance have demonstrated that encoding and retrieval processes are differentially affected by the simultaneous performance of a secondary task. Whilst dual task demands during encoding have a detrimental effect on memory performance, dual task demands during retrieval have a detrimental effect on secondary task performance. However, dual task effects on memory during encoding appear unaffected by age, while effects at retrieval on secondary task performance are age sensitive. Most previous studies have focused on free recall or cued recall of word lists. In the current study, encoding and retrieval were examined in younger and older healthy adults performing a task typically thought to load verbal working memory, namely immediate serial ordered digit recall together with a response time (RT) task. In Experiment 1, the demands of a secondary RT task were varied as a function of response-to-stimulus interval, while in Experiment 2 the predictability of the stimulus location was manipulated. In both age groups, dual task during encoding, but not at retrieval, produced significant interference in memory performance and unlike most previous studies the impact at encoding was greater for the older group. In contrast, significantly slower RTs were demonstrated under dual task conditions during encoding and retrieval. Older adults produced significantly slower RTs than younger adults only for dual task at retrieval. Older people were more sensitive to time pressure in responding under dual task conditions, but neither group was sensitive to predictability of stimulus location. Results are consistent with the concept of a cognitive resource that supports dual task performance, and that is sensitive to the effects of age on memory encoding of items that rely heavily on the operation of verbal working memory resources. The age sensitivity to dual task only became apparent when effects at encoding and at retrieval were considered separately.

[1]  T. Salthouse,et al.  Divided attention abilities in young and old adults. , 1982, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[2]  Wayne A. Wickelgren,et al.  Speed-accuracy tradeoff and information processing dynamics , 1977 .

[3]  Don Trumbo,et al.  Primary task performance as a function of encoding, retention, and recall in a secondary task. , 1971 .

[4]  B. Murdock EFFECTS OF A SUBSIDIARY TASK ON SHORT‐TERM MEMORY , 1965 .

[5]  D. Park,et al.  Memory for pictures: does an age-related decline exist? , 1986, Psychology and aging.

[6]  L. Nyberg,et al.  Effects of division of attention during encoding and retrieval on age differences in episodic memory. , 1997, Experimental aging research.

[7]  R E Wright,et al.  Aging, divided attention, and processing capacity. , 1981, Journal of gerontology.

[8]  M Moscovitch,et al.  Source memory and divided attention: reciprocal costs to primary and secondary tasks. , 1999, Neuropsychology.

[9]  William A. Johnston,et al.  Speed, accuracy, and ease of recall. , 1972 .

[10]  S. R. Parkinson,et al.  Aging, dichotic memory and digit span. , 1980, Journal of gerontology.

[11]  A. Hartley,et al.  Age-related differences and similarities in dual-task interference. , 1999, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[12]  F. Craik,et al.  Effects of aging and task difficulty on divided attention performance. , 1988, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[13]  A. Baddeley,et al.  Exploring the Articulatory Loop , 1984 .

[14]  S. Belleville,et al.  Effect of normal aging on the manipulation of information in working memory , 1998, Memory & cognition.

[15]  A. Baddeley,et al.  Attention and retrieval from long-term memory. , 1984 .

[16]  F. Craik,et al.  Divided attention in younger and older adults: effects of strategy and relatedness on memory performance and secondary task costs. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[17]  D. Griffith,et al.  The attentional demands of mnemonic control processes , 1976, Memory & cognition.

[18]  F. Craik,et al.  Processing resources and age differences in working memory , 1988, Memory & cognition.

[19]  Sarah E. MacPherson,et al.  Concurrent performance of two memory tasks: Evidence for domain-specific working memory systems , 2002, Memory & cognition.

[20]  J. Duchek Encoding and retrieval differences between young and old: The impact of attentional capacity usage. , 1984 .

[21]  A. Baddeley,et al.  Attentional control in Alzheimer's disease. , 2001, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[22]  A. Baddeley,et al.  The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section a Human Experimental Psychology Dementia and Working Memory Dementia and Working Memory , 2022 .

[23]  F. Craik,et al.  Task complexity and age differences in working memory , 1988, Memory & cognition.

[24]  D. Park,et al.  Cue utilization and encoding specificity in picture recognition by older adults. , 1987, Journal of gerontology.

[25]  T. Salthouse,et al.  Division of attention: Age differences on a visually presented memory task , 1984, Memory & cognition.

[26]  M Naveh-Benjamin,et al.  The Effects of Divided Attention on Encoding and Retrieval Processes: The Resiliency of Retrieval Processes , 2000, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[27]  Alan D Baddeley,et al.  Is there a specific executive capacity for dual task coordination? Evidence from Alzheimer's disease. , 2004, Neuropsychology.

[28]  F. Craik,et al.  The effects of divided attention on encoding and retrieval processes in human memory. , 1996, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[29]  R. T. Kellogg,et al.  Conscious attentional demands of encoding and retrieval from long-term memory. , 1982, The American journal of psychology.

[30]  M Naveh-Benjamin,et al.  Divided attention during encoding and retrieval: differential control effects? , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[31]  F. Craik,et al.  The attentional demands of encoding and retrieval in younger and older adults: 1. Evidence from divided attention costs. , 1998, Psychology and aging.

[32]  T. Salthouse,et al.  Aging of attention: Does the ability to divide decline? , 1995, Memory & cognition.

[33]  A. D. Smith,et al.  Effects of age and a divided attention task presented during encoding and retrieval on memory. , 1989, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[34]  Divided attention and memory: evidence of substantial interference effects at retrieval and encoding. , 2000 .

[35]  F. Craik,et al.  Age differences in recall and recognition , 1987 .

[36]  Moshe Naveh-Benjamin,et al.  The effects of divided attention at encoding on item and associative memory , 2003, Memory & cognition.

[37]  H. Buschke,et al.  Age differences in cognitive effort in recall. , 1983, Journal of gerontology.

[38]  F. Carp Handbook of the psychology of aging. , 1977 .

[39]  Moshe Naveh-Benjamin,et al.  Asymmetry between encoding and retrieval processes: Evidence from divided attention and a calibration analysis , 2000, Memory & cognition.

[40]  Myra A. Fernandes,et al.  Divided attention and memory: evidence of substantial interference effects at retrieval and encoding. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[41]  A D Baddeley,et al.  The decline of working memory in Alzheimer's disease. A longitudinal study. , 1991, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[42]  M. Naveh-Benjamin,et al.  Effects of divided attention on encoding and retrieval processes: assessment of attentional costs and a componential analysis. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[43]  W. Johnston,et al.  Divided attention: a vehicle for monitoring memory processes. , 1970, Journal of experimental psychology.

[44]  Moshe Naveh-Benjamin,et al.  Effects of Divided Attention on Encoding and Retrieval Processes in Human Memory: Further Support for an Asymmetry , 1998 .