Multi-criteria evaluation of cooking energy alternatives for promoting parabolic solar cooker in India

The policy formulation for cooking energy substitution by renewables is addressed in multi-criteria context. A survey is conducted to know the perceptions of different decision making groups on present dissemination of various cooking energy alternatives in India. Nine cooking energy alternatives are evaluated on 30 different criteria comprising of technical, economic, environmental/social, behavioral and commercial issues. Preference Ranking Organization METHod for Enrichment Evaluation (PROMETHEE), a multi-criteria decision making method of outranking nature is used to rank the alternatives. It is found that liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) stove is the most preferred device, followed by kerosene stove, solar box cooker and parabolic solar cooker (PSC) in that order. A sensitivity analysis is also carried out for identifying potential areas for improvement for PSC. On the basis of results, strategies for promoting wide spread use of PSC are formulated.

[1]  Ravi C Moorthy.  Gujarat Energy Development Agency: The Case of Solar Cookers , 1990 .

[2]  E. Georgopoulou,et al.  A multicriteria decision aid approach for energy planning problems: The case of renewable energy option , 1997 .

[3]  P. Venkata Ramana,et al.  Participatory rural energy planning in India -- a policy context , 2001 .

[4]  L. S. Ganesh,et al.  A multi-objective analysis of cooking-energy alternatives , 1994 .

[5]  Jean Pierre Brans,et al.  HOW TO SELECT AND HOW TO RANK PROJECTS: THE PROMETHEE METHOD , 1986 .

[6]  Komaragiri Srinivasa Raju,et al.  Multicriterion decision making in performance evaluation of an irrigation system , 1999, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[7]  Irene P. Koronaki,et al.  ORME: A multicriteria rating methodology for buildings , 2002 .

[8]  Heracles Polatidis,et al.  Renewable energy projects: structuring a multi-criteria group decision-making framework , 2003 .

[9]  B. Sudhakara Reddy,et al.  Overcoming the energy efficiency gap in India's household sector , 2003 .

[10]  Tara C. Kandpal,et al.  Solar cooker use in Delhi: pilot survey of urban households , 1997 .

[11]  B. W. Ang,et al.  Decision analysis in energy and environmental modeling , 1995 .

[12]  Girja Sharan,et al.  Assessing Consumer Preference for Product Features Selection : Solar Cookers , 1997 .

[13]  Lucien Duckstein,et al.  Analysing Water Resources Alternatives and Handling Criteria by Multi Criterion Decision Techniques , 1996 .

[14]  Sumit Gupta.  98/00871 Financial analysis of cooking energy options for India , 1997 .

[15]  M. Grupp,et al.  SOLAR COOKER ACCEPTANCE IN SOUTH AFRICA: RESULTS OF A COMPARATIVE FIELD-TEST , 1999 .

[16]  Bashir Ahmad,et al.  Users and disusers of box solar cookers in urban India—: Implications for solar cooking projects , 2001 .

[17]  M. G Goumas,et al.  Computational methods for planning and evaluating geothermal energy projects , 1999 .