A tunnel study to characterize PM2.5 emissions from gasoline-powered vehicles in Monterrey, Mexico

Abstract One of the main sources of air pollution in the Monterrey Metropolitan Area (MMA), Mexico, is vehicle exhaust. In this study, emission factors (EFs) for PM2.5, organic carbon (OC), elemental carbon (EC), trace metals (Na to Pb), cations (Na+, K+, NH4+) and anions (Cl−, NO3−, SO42−) from mobile sources operating under real-world conditions were determined using the Loma Larga Tunnel (LLT) as the experimental set-up. At each station, low-volume devices were deployed to collect 2.5 h-average PM2.5 samples. From the samples collected, PM2.5 EFs as well as chemical profiles were estimated. During the sampling periods conducted for this study, a fleet of 108,569 vehicles crossed the tunnel with average speeds that ranged from 43 km h−1 to 76 km h−1. 97% of the vehicle samples were gasoline-powered vehicles. Average emission rates of 22.8 ± 7.4 mg veh−1 km−1 and 187 ± 144 mg L−1 for PM2.5 were obtained. Contribution of dust resuspension to the total PM2.5 EFs was analyzed using silicon (Si) as a key marker and main component of fugitive dust. Based on this analysis, we estimated a contribution of dust resuspension of 20%–25%. Trace metals linked to brake-wear emissions indicate a clear distinction between down-slope and up-slope emission profiles. Even though PM2.5 EFs tended to be higher during downhill driving conditions, statistically we found no difference between these two driving modes. This could probably be caused by the cancellation of contributions between species that are preferentially emitted during downhill driving (more metal species and less OC and EC) and those emitted during uphill driving (more OC and EC, and less metals). Vehicular PM2.5 emissions were dominated mainly by OC and EC, species which represented 55.2 ± 2.8% and 16.3 ± 1.6% of the total dust-corrected emitted mass. The OC/EC ratio was 2.85 ± 0.79 and 1.19 ± 0.65 for heavy traffic and moderate traffic conditions, respectively. The results obtained match those of other tunnel studies and can be complementary to the results obtained by other techniques to derive a better emissions inventory for the MMA.

[1]  P. Hopke,et al.  Source apportionment for ambient particles in the San Gorgonio wilderness , 2004 .

[2]  Fine and Coarse Particulate Matter Chemical Characterization in a Heavily Industrialized City in Central Mexico during Winter 2003 , 2007, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association.

[3]  David Proffitt,et al.  Tailpipe, resuspended road dust, and brake-wear emission factors from on-road vehicles , 2003 .

[4]  J. Schauer,et al.  Light- and Heavy-Duty Vehicle Emission Factors of PM Species Based on Freeway Measurements and Comparison With Tunnel and Dynamometer Studies , 2007 .

[5]  R V Díaz,et al.  Health risk by inhalation of PM2.5 in the metropolitan zone of the City of Mexico. , 2009, Ecotoxicology and environmental safety.

[6]  Hampden Kuhns,et al.  Source profiles for industrial, mobile, and area sources in the Big Bend Regional Aerosol Visibility and Observational study. , 2004, Chemosphere.

[7]  P. Bhave,et al.  Primary and secondary organic aerosols over the United States: estimates on the basis of observed organic carbon (OC) and elemental carbon (EC), and air quality modeled primary OC/EC ratios , 2004 .

[8]  Åke Sjödin,et al.  Metal emissions from road traffic and the influence of resuspension: results from two tunnel studies , 2002 .

[9]  Werner A. Stahel,et al.  Aerosol emission in a road tunnel , 1997 .

[10]  Yasmany Mancilla,et al.  A tunnel study to estimate emission factors from mobile sources in Monterrey, Mexico , 2012, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association.

[11]  D. Ceburnis,et al.  Estimation of atmospheric trace metal emissions in Vilnius City, Lithuania, using vertical concentration gradient and road tunnel measurement data , 2002 .

[12]  G. Bishop,et al.  On-Road Remote Sensing of Vehicle Emissions in Mexico , 1997 .

[13]  Edson Tomaz,et al.  Emission factors for gas-powered vehicles traveling through road tunnels in São Paulo, Brazil. , 2006, Environmental science & technology.

[14]  Roy M. Harrison,et al.  Primary particle formation from vehicle emissions during exhaust dilution in the roadside atmosphere , 2003 .

[15]  A W Gertler,et al.  On-road particulate matter (PM2.5 and PM10) emissions in the Sepulveda Tunnel, Los Angeles, California. , 2001, Environmental science & technology.

[16]  C. Hung-Lung,et al.  Particulate matter emissions from on-road vehicles in a freeway tunnel study , 2009 .

[17]  J C Chow,et al.  Source characterization of major emission sources in the imperial and Mexicali Valleys along the US/Mexico border. , 2001, The Science of the total environment.

[18]  J. Schauer,et al.  Emissions of metals associated with motor vehicle roadways. , 2005, Environmental science & technology.

[19]  T. Young,et al.  Resuspension of soil as a source of airborne lead near industrial facilities and highways. , 2002, Environmental science & technology.

[20]  Andreas Limbeck,et al.  Particulate emissions from on-road vehicles in the Kaisermühlen-tunnel (Vienna, Austria) , 2004 .

[21]  Mei-Yin Hwa,et al.  Real-world vehicle emissions and VOCs profile in the Taipei tunnel located at Taiwan Taipei area , 2002 .

[22]  Isaac Schifter,et al.  Estimation of Motor Vehicle Toxic Emissions in the Metropolitan Area of Mexico City , 2000 .

[23]  Peter E. Jackson,et al.  Ion Chromatography in Environmental Analysis , 2006 .

[24]  Alan W. Gertler,et al.  Diesel vs. gasoline emissions: Does PM from diesel or gasoline vehicles dominate in the US? , 2005 .

[25]  Barbara Zielinska,et al.  Real-world emissions and calculated reactivities of organic species from motor vehicles , 1996 .

[26]  S. Tohno,et al.  A case study of the single and size-resolved particles in roadway tunnel in Seoul, Korea , 2004 .

[27]  Barbara Zielinska,et al.  Real-world automotive emissions—Summary of studies in the Fort McHenry and Tuscarora mountain tunnels , 1995 .

[28]  Les Kirkup.  Data Analysis for Physical Scientists: Propagation of uncertainties , 2012 .

[29]  J. Schwartz,et al.  Association between PM2.5 and all-cause and specific-cause mortality in 27 US communities , 2007, Journal of Exposure Science and Environmental Epidemiology.

[30]  Gerald Falkenberg,et al.  Real-world emission factors for antimony and other brake wear related trace elements: size-segregated values for light and heavy duty vehicles. , 2009, Environmental science & technology.

[31]  Mark D. Semon,et al.  POSTUSE REVIEW: An Introduction to Error Analysis: The Study of Uncertainties in Physical Measurements , 1982 .

[32]  Brian J. Reich,et al.  Spatial-temporal association between fine particulate matter and daily mortality , 2009, Comput. Stat. Data Anal..

[33]  Christopher A. Laroo,et al.  Brake Wear Particulate Matter Emissions , 2000 .

[34]  I. Marr,et al.  Size and composition of particulate emissions from motor vehicles in the Kaisermühlen-Tunnel, Vienna , 2008 .

[35]  Isaac Schifter,et al.  Impact of engine technology on the vehicular emissions in Mexico City , 2000 .

[36]  L. Morawska,et al.  Diesel bus emissions measured in a tunnel study. , 2004, Environmental science & technology.

[37]  G R Cass,et al.  Emissions of size-segregated aerosols from on-road vehicles in the Caldecott tunnel. , 2001, Environmental science & technology.

[38]  J. Chow,et al.  Chemically-speciated on-road PM(2.5) motor vehicle emission factors in Hong Kong. , 2010, The Science of the total environment.

[39]  J. Chow,et al.  Chemical composition of fugitive dust emitters in Mexico City , 2001 .

[40]  K. Katsouyanni.  Ambient air pollution and health. , 2003, British medical bulletin.

[41]  Yifang Zhu,et al.  Study of ultrafine particles near a major highway with heavy-duty diesel traffic , 2002 .

[42]  Thomas D. Durbin,et al.  Final report for measurement of primary particulate matter emissions from light-duty motor vehicles , 1998 .