Quantifying mesoscale soil moisture with the cosmic-ray rover

Abstract. Soil moisture governs the surface fluxes of mass and energy and is a major influence on floods and drought. Existing techniques measure soil moisture either at a point or over a large area many kilometers across. To bridge these two scales we used the cosmic-ray rover, an instrument similar to the recently developed COSMOS probe, but bigger and mobile. This paper explores the challenges and opportunities for mapping soil moisture over large areas using the cosmic-ray rover. In 2012, soil moisture was mapped 22 times in a 25 km × 40 km survey area of the Tucson Basin at an average of 1.7 km2 resolution, i.e., a survey area extent comparable to that of a pixel for the Soil Moisture and Ocean Salinity (SMOS) satellite mission. The soil moisture distribution is dominated by climatic variations, notably by the North American monsoon, that results in a systematic increase in the standard deviation, observed up to 0.022 m3 m−3, as a function of the mean, between 0.06 m3 m−3 and 0.14 m3 m−3. Two techniques are explored to use the cosmic-ray rover data for hydrologic applications: (1) interpolation of the 22 surveys into a daily soil moisture product by defining an approach to utilize and quantify the observed temporal stability producing an average correlation coefficient of 0.82 for the soil moisture distributions that were surveyed, and (2) estimation of soil moisture profiles by combining surface moisture from satellite microwave sensors (SMOS) with deeper measurements from the cosmic-ray rover. The interpolated soil moisture and soil moisture profiles allow for basin-wide mass balance calculation of evapotranspiration, which amounted to 241 mm in 2012. Generating soil moisture maps with a cosmic-ray rover at this intermediate scale may help in the calibration and validation of satellite soil moisture data products and may also aid in various large-scale hydrologic studies.

[1]  R. Kalin The hydrogeochemical evolution of the groundwater of the Tucson Basin with application to 3-dimensional groundwater flow modelling. , 1994 .

[2]  Charles A. Laymon,et al.  Ground-based passive microwave remote sensing observations of soil moisture at S-band and L-band with insight into measurement accuracy , 2001, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[3]  T. Ferré,et al.  Nature's neutron probe: Land surface hydrology at an elusive scale with cosmic rays , 2010 .

[4]  H. Guan,et al.  Mountain-Block Hydrology and Mountain-Front Recharge. , 2004 .

[5]  Rafael Rosolem,et al.  Measurement depth of the cosmic ray soil moisture probe affected by hydrogen from various sources , 2012 .

[6]  H. Vereecken,et al.  Potential of Wireless Sensor Networks for Measuring Soil Water Content Variability , 2010 .

[7]  T. Jackson,et al.  Field observations of soil moisture variability across scales , 2008 .

[8]  W. James Shuttleworth,et al.  Ecosystem‐scale measurements of biomass water using cosmic ray neutrons , 2013 .

[9]  R. Scott,et al.  Measuring soil moisture content non‐invasively at intermediate spatial scale using cosmic‐ray neutrons , 2008 .

[10]  Yann Kerr,et al.  The hydrosphere State (hydros) Satellite mission: an Earth system pathfinder for global mapping of soil moisture and land freeze/thaw , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[11]  M. Plummer,et al.  Deep arid system hydrodynamics 1. Equilibrium states and response times in thick desert vadose zones , 2002 .

[12]  T. Jackson,et al.  Watershed scale temporal and spatial stability of soil moisture and its role in validating satellite estimates , 2004 .

[13]  W. J. Shuttleworth,et al.  COSMOS: the COsmic-ray Soil Moisture Observing System , 2012 .

[14]  M. Zreda,et al.  Footprint diameter for a cosmic‐ray soil moisture probe: Theory and Monte Carlo simulations , 2013 .

[15]  Rafael Rosolem,et al.  The Effect of Atmospheric Water Vapor on Neutron Count in the Cosmic-Ray Soil Moisture Observing System , 2013 .

[16]  Günter Blöschl,et al.  Spatial correlation of soil moisture in small catchments and its relationship to dominant spatial hydrological processes , 2004 .

[17]  E. Small,et al.  Use of GPS receivers as a soil moisture network for water cycle studies , 2008 .

[18]  T. Ferré,et al.  Field Validation of a Cosmic‐Ray Neutron Sensor Using a Distributed Sensor Network , 2012 .

[19]  E. Gadioli,et al.  Introductory Nuclear Physics , 1997 .

[20]  José Martínez-Fernández,et al.  Temporal Stability of Soil Moisture in a Large‐Field Experiment in Spain , 2003 .

[21]  R. Knight,et al.  Soil Moisture Measurement for Ecological and Hydrological Watershed‐Scale Observatories: A Review , 2008 .

[22]  Günter Blöschl,et al.  On the spatial scaling of soil moisture , 1999 .

[23]  G. Vachaud,et al.  Temporal Stability of Spatially Measured Soil Water Probability Density Function , 1985 .

[24]  Darin Desilets,et al.  Spatial and temporal distribution of secondary cosmic-ray nucleon intensities and applications to in situ cosmogenic dating , 2003 .

[25]  Louis R. Jurwitz Arizona's Two-Season Rainfall Pattern , 1953 .

[26]  The Effect of Atmospheric Water Vapor on the Cosmic-ray Soil Moisture Signal , 2012 .

[27]  Thomas J. Jackson,et al.  Profile Soil Moisture from Surface Measurements , 1980 .

[28]  T. Ferré,et al.  Processes Controlling Recharge Beneath Ephemeral Streams in Southern Arizona , 2013 .

[29]  Yann Kerr,et al.  The SMOS Mission: New Tool for Monitoring Key Elements ofthe Global Water Cycle , 2010, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[30]  Juan B. Valdés,et al.  Modeling climate change impacts – and uncertainty – on the hydrology of a riparian system: The San Pedro Basin (Arizona/Sonora) , 2007 .