Different diagnostic properties of C-reactive protein, real-time PCR, and histopathology of frozen and permanent sections in diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection

Background and purpose There are several diagnostic tests for periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). We evaluated the properties of preoperative serum C-reactive protein (CRP), real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR), and histopathological evaluation of frozen and permanent sections in clinical cases with culture-positive PJI. Patients and methods 63 joints involving 86 operations were analyzed using serum CRP measurement prior to operation and tissue samples were collected intraoperatively for real-time PCR and histopathology. We calculated the sensitivity, specificity, likelihood ratio of positive test results (PLR), and likelihood ratio of negative test results (NLR) for each test in relation to positive microbiological culture results as the gold standard. Results The sensitivity and specificity of diagnosis with serum CRP were 90% and 85%, respectively. The corresponding values for real-time PCR and histopathology of frozen and paraffin tissue sections were 90% and 45%, 71% and 89%, and 90% and 87%, respectively. Serum CRP had a PLR of 5.8 and an NLR of 0.12, and real-time PCR had a PLR of 1.6 and an NLR of 0.18. The corresponding figures for frozen tissue sections were 6.6 and 0.32, and those for paraffin sections were 7.1 and 0.11, respectively. Interpretation The results suggest that real-time PCR and histopathology of frozen sections is a good combination. The former is suitable for screening, with its high sensitivity and good NLR, while the latter is suitable for definitive diagnosis of infection, with its excellent specificity and good PLR.

[1]  Willits,et al.  Reassessment of the usefulness of frozen section analysis for hip and knee joint revisions , 2014 .

[2]  A. Del Arco,et al.  The Diagnosis of Periprosthetic Infection , 2013, The open orthopaedics journal.

[3]  Tomoyuki Saito,et al.  Quantitative evaluation of periprosthetic infection by real-time polymerase chain reaction: a comparison with conventional methods. , 2012, Diagnostic microbiology and infectious disease.

[4]  A. Johnson,et al.  How do frozen and permanent histopathologic diagnoses compare for staged revision after periprosthetic hip infections? , 2012, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[5]  V. Montori,et al.  Utility of intraoperative frozen section histopathology in the diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis. , 2012, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[6]  Robin Patel,et al.  Prosthetic Joint Infection Diagnosis Using Broad-Range PCR of Biofilms Dislodged from Knee and Hip Arthroplasty Surfaces Using Sonication , 2012, Journal of Clinical Microbiology.

[7]  E. Gómez-Barrena,et al.  PCR-hybridization after sonication improves diagnosis of implant-related infection , 2012, Acta orthopaedica.

[8]  J. Parvizi,et al.  New Definition for Periprosthetic Joint Infection: From the Workgroup of the Musculoskeletal Infection Society , 2011, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[9]  M. Keith,et al.  American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons clinical practice guideline on: the diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infections of the hip and knee. , 2011, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[10]  C. Perka,et al.  Validity of Frozen Sections for Analysis of Periprosthetic Loosening Membranes , 2010, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[11]  Tomoyuki Saito,et al.  Simultaneous intraoperative detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus and pan-bacterial infection during revision surgery: use of simple DNA release by ultrasonication and real-time polymerase chain reaction. , 2009, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[12]  P. Savelkoul,et al.  Streptococcus pneumoniae DNA Load in Blood as a Marker of Infection in Patients with Community-Acquired Pneumonia , 2009, Journal of Clinical Microbiology.

[13]  D. Jack,et al.  Severity of meningococcal disease associated with genomic bacterial load. , 2009, Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America.

[14]  Á. Soriano,et al.  Neutrophils in frozen section and type of microorganism isolated at the time of resection arthroplasty for the treatment of infection , 2009, Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery.

[15]  H. Frierson,et al.  Reassessment of the usefulness of frozen section analysis for hip and knee joint revisions. , 2008, American journal of clinical pathology.

[16]  T. Bauer,et al.  Molecular Identification of Bacteria from Aseptically Loose Implants , 2008, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[17]  L. Frommelt,et al.  Proposal for a histopathological consensus classification of the periprosthetic interface membrane , 2006, Journal of Clinical Pathology.

[18]  R. Bourne,et al.  Preoperative Evaluations in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty , 2006, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[19]  J. Parvizi,et al.  Diagnosis of periprosthetic infection. , 2006, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[20]  J. Bartlett,et al.  Quantitative PCR Assay Using Sputum Samples for Rapid Diagnosis of Pneumococcal Pneumonia in Adult Emergency Department Patients , 2005, Journal of Clinical Microbiology.

[21]  L. Frommelt,et al.  Is "aseptic" loosening of the prosthetic cup after total hip replacement due to nonculturable bacterial pathogens in patients with low-grade infection? , 2004, Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America.

[22]  Paul T. H. Lee,et al.  Polymerase Chain Reaction Can Detect Bacterial DNA in Aseptically Loose Total Hip Arthroplasties , 2004, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[23]  S. Hinrichs,et al.  PCR Rapidly Detects Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococci Periprosthetic Infection , 2003, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[24]  H. Kaufer,et al.  Intraoperative Frozen Section Analysis in Revision Total Joint Arthroplasty , 2002, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[25]  S. Gorman,et al.  Detection of Prosthetic Hip Infection at Revision Arthroplasty by Immunofluorescence Microscopy and PCR Amplification of the Bacterial 16S rRNA Gene , 1999, Journal of Clinical Microbiology.

[26]  J. Zuckerman,et al.  Analysis of frozen sections of intraoperative specimens obtained at the time of reoperation after hip or knee resection arthroplasty for the treatment of infection. , 1999, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[27]  J. Zuckerman,et al.  The Reliability of Analysis of Intraoperative Frozen Sections for Identifying Active Infection during Revision Hip or Knee Arthroplasty*† , 1996, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[28]  R. Tuan,et al.  Polymerase Chain Reaction Detection of Bacterial Infection in Total Knee Arthroplasty , 1996, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.