Biophilic Water Criteria: Exploring a Technique to Develop an Environmentally Sustainable Biophilic Design Framework

The built environment is obligated to respond to the global environmental movement, considering its significant environmental impacts. Environmentally Sustainable Design (ESD), one of the key strategies in this response, is based on frameworks that encourage designers to provide evidence of performances against predetermined targets. ESD frameworks are often used in sustainable design studios as educational tools, highly influenced by Green Building Rating Tools (GBRT) used in the industry. These tools primarily promote technologically advanced design solutions with limited opportunities for enhancing human–nature connectedness. In contrast, biophilic design has been identified as the missing link to reconnect humans to nature, as it promotes the use of natural processes. If these natural processes can ensure the building performances required by ESD, the design could harness the benefits of human–nature connectedness and enhanced building performance. Thus, a systematic technique to incorporate biophilic approach into the ESD framework is required, that is replicable and easily used in architectural design education. This paper outlines a systematic technique to develop an ESD framework for water efficiency that incorporates biophilic design and sustainability performance, applicable within architectural design education. The methodology relied on a two-step approach: (1) the development of the biophilic water criteria framework and (2) the evaluation of the criteria against four different and widely used GBRTs. This study revealed that the technique could assist in developing a framework to guide towards a biophilic and sustainable design. Furthermore, the evaluation showed that the proposed criteria were compatible with the GBRT. The proposed technique has a great potential to be adopted as a guide in architectural design education to bridge ESD and biophilia.

[1]  V. Soebarto,et al.  Biophilia and Salutogenesis as restorative design approaches in healthcare architecture , 2019, Architectural Science Review.

[2]  Vivian W. Y Tam,et al.  Key credit criteria among international green building rating tools , 2017 .

[3]  Raymond J. Cole Shared markets: coexisting building environmental assessment methods , 2006 .

[4]  T. Bulc,et al.  Constructed wetland (CW) for industrial waste water treatment , 1996 .

[5]  J. Yudelson The Green Building Revolution , 2007 .

[6]  Sergio Altomonte,et al.  Environmental Education for Sustainable Architecture , 2009 .

[7]  F. Orsini,et al.  Soil Based and Simplified Hydroponics Rooftop Gardens , 2017 .

[8]  Zhonghua Gou,et al.  Visual alliesthesia: The gap between comfortable and stimulating illuminance settings , 2014 .

[9]  S. A. Ostroumov,et al.  Water Quality and Conditioning in Natural Ecosystems: Biomachinery Theory of Self-Purification of Water , 2017, Russian Journal of General Chemistry.

[10]  S. Lau,et al.  Incorporating biophilia into green building rating tools for promoting health and wellbeing , 2019, Environmental Impact Assessment Review.

[11]  A. Brambilla,et al.  Bridging biophilic design and environmentally sustainable design: A critical review , 2020 .

[12]  Po-Han Chen,et al.  A review of studies on green building assessment methods by comparative analysis , 2017 .

[14]  Hong-Ying Hu,et al.  Roles of substrate microorganisms and urease activities in wastewater purification in a constructed wetland system , 2003 .

[15]  V. Strang Common Senses , 2005 .

[16]  Catherine O. Ryan,et al.  14 Patterns of Biophilic Design: Improving Health and Well-Being in the Built Environment , 2014 .

[17]  J. Heerwagen,et al.  Biophilic Design: The Theory, Science and Practice of Bringing Buildings to Life , 2011 .

[18]  Kutlu Sevinç Kayıhan Examination of Biophilia Phenomenon in the Context of Sustainable Architecture , 2017 .

[19]  Hongxing Yang,et al.  A comprehensive review on passive design approaches in green building rating tools , 2015 .

[20]  Ayşin Sev A comparative analysis of building environmental assessment tools and suggestions for regional adaptations , 2011 .

[21]  Yongwen Ma,et al.  Online prediction of effluent COD in the anaerobic wastewater treatment system based on PCA-LSSVM algorithm , 2019, Environmental Science and Pollution Research.

[22]  J. B. Callicott,et al.  Nature in Asian Traditions of Thought: Essays in Environmental Philosophy , 2005 .

[23]  D. Kalupahana Buddhist Philosophy: A Historical Analysis , 1976 .

[24]  Lijuan Li,et al.  Study on the purification effect of aeration-enhanced horizontal subsurface-flow constructed wetland on polluted urban river water , 2019, Environmental Science and Pollution Research.

[25]  M. Asif,et al.  Water Efficiency and Management in Sustainable Building Rating Systems: Examining Variation in Criteria Usage , 2019, Sustainability.

[26]  Luisa F. Cabeza,et al.  Phase change materials and thermal energy storage for buildings , 2015 .

[27]  Bon-Gang Hwang,et al.  Green building rating systems: Global reviews of practices and research efforts , 2018 .

[28]  Zhonghua Gou,et al.  Evolving green building: triple bottom line or regenerative design? , 2017 .