The influence of prosodic structure on the resolution of temporary syntactic closure ambiguities

This paper investigates the influence of prosodic structure on the process of sentence comprehension, with a specific focus on the relative contributions of syntactic and prosodic information to the resolution of temporary syntactic closure ambiguities. We argue that prosodic structure provides an initial memory representation for spoken sentences, and that information from this prosodic representation is available to inform syntactic parsing decisions. This view makes three predictions for the processing of temporary syntactic ambiguity: 1. When prosodic and syntactic boundaries coincide, syntactic processing should be facilitated. 2. When prosodic boundaries are placed at misleading points in syntactic structure, syntactic processing should show interference effects. 3. The processing difficulties that have been reliably demonstrated in reading experiments for syntactically complex sentences should disappear when those sentences are presented with a felicitous prosodic structure in listening experiments. These predictions were confirmed by series of experiments measuring end-of-sentence comprehension time and cross-modal naming time for sentences with temporary syntactic closure ambiguities. Sentences with coinciding or conflicting prosodic and syntactic boundaries were compared to a prosodic baseline condition.

[1]  Lyn Frazier,et al.  Sentence processing: A tutorial review. , 1987 .

[2]  James Paul Gee,et al.  Performance structures: A psycholinguistic and linguistic appraisal , 1983, Cognitive Psychology.

[3]  Mari Ostendorf,et al.  The use of prosody in syntactic disambiguation , 1991 .

[4]  J. Klein,et al.  Syntactic structure and acoustic pattern in speech perception Arthur Wingfield , 1971 .

[5]  Bradley L. Pritchett.  Garden Path Phenomena and the Grammatical Basis of Language Processing , 1988 .

[6]  Fernanda Ferreira,et al.  Why study spoken language , 1994 .

[7]  L. Tyler,et al.  Local and Global Structure in Spoken Language Comprehension , 1987 .

[8]  Michael K. Tanenhaus,et al.  Thematic roles and language comprehension , 1988 .

[9]  E. Selkirk.  On derived domains in sentence phonology , 1986, Phonology.

[10]  D. Robert Ladd,et al.  Intonational phrasing: the case for recursive prosodic structure , 1986, Phonology.

[11]  W. Marslen-Wilson,et al.  The temporal structure of spoken language understanding , 1980, Cognition.

[12]  G. Simpson,et al.  Selective access of homograph meanings in sentence context , 1991 .

[13]  M. Steedman,et al.  Syntax and intonational structure in a combinatory grammar , 1991 .

[14]  Mitchell P. Marcus,et al.  Description theory and intonation boundaries , 1991 .

[15]  Cheryl M. Beach,et al.  The interpretation of prosodic patterns at points of syntactic structure ambiguity: Evidence for cue trading relations☆ , 1991 .

[16]  Elisabeth Selkirk,et al.  Phonology and Syntax: The Relation between Sound and Structure , 1984 .

[17]  I. Lehiste,et al.  Role of duration in disambiguating syntactically ambiguous sentences , 1975 .

[18]  K. Rayner,et al.  Making and correcting errors during sentence comprehension: Eye movements in the analysis of structurally ambiguous sentences , 1982, Cognitive Psychology.

[19]  Maryellen C. MacDonald,et al.  The lexical nature of syntactic ambiguity resolution , 1994 .

[20]  Fernanda Ferreira.  Creation of prosody during sentence production. , 1993 .

[21]  I. Lehiste.  Phonetic Disambiguation of Syntactic Ambiguity , 1973 .

[22]  William D. Marslen-Wilson,et al.  THE QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1992,45A (1) 73-87 Prosodic Effects in Minimal Attachment , 2022 .

[23]  P. Lieberman.  On the Acoustic Basis of the Perception of Intonation by Linguists , 1965 .