Investigation of early compressive strength of fly ash-based geopolymer concrete

Abstract Development of sustainable construction materials has been the focus of research efforts worldwide in recent years. Concrete is a major construction material; hence, finding alternatives to ordinary Portland cement is of extreme importance due to high levels of carbon dioxide emissions associated with its manufacturing process. This study investigates the effects of activating solution type, curing procedure, and source of fly ash in relation to the resulting compressive strength of fly ash-based geopolymer concrete. The fly ash-based geopolymer paste microstructure was observed and density, absorption and voids were measured. Two activating solutions were used: a) a mixture of sodium hydroxide, silica fume, and water; and b) a mixture of sodium hydroxide solution, sodium silicate, and water. Test results indicate that the resulting concrete has the potential for high compressive strength and the compressive strength is directly affected by the source of fly ash. Results further indicate that compressive strength is not significantly affected by the curing condition when silica fume is used in the activating solution in comparison to the use of sodium silicate.

[1]  Hongxi Wang,et al.  Bonding and abrasion resistance of geopolymeric repair material made with steel slag , 2008 .

[2]  A. H. Korayem,et al.  The role of alumina on performance of alkali-activated slag paste exposed to 50 °C , 2013 .

[3]  B. V. Rangan,et al.  Fly ash-based geopolymer concrete: study of slender reinforced columns , 2007 .

[4]  Hamid Nikraz,et al.  Properties of fly ash geopolymer concrete designed by Taguchi method , 2012 .

[5]  B. Vijaya Rangan,et al.  ON THE DEVELOPMENT OF FLY ASH-BASED GEOPOLYMER CONCRETE , 2004 .

[6]  S. E. Wallah,et al.  Drying Shrinkage of Heat-Cured Fly Ash-Based Geopolymer Concrete , 2009 .

[7]  E. Allouche,et al.  Factors affecting the suitability of fly ash as source material for geopolymers , 2010 .

[8]  J. Deventer,et al.  Geopolymer technology: the current state of the art , 2007 .

[9]  D Hardjito,et al.  Fly Ash-Based Geopolymer Concrete , 2005 .

[10]  Jay G. Sanjayan,et al.  Damage behavior of geopolymer composites exposed to elevated temperatures , 2008 .

[11]  Natalie Lloyd,et al.  Geopolymer Concrete with Fly Ash , 2010 .

[12]  J. Sanjayan,et al.  Factors influencing softening temperature and hot-strength of geopolymers , 2012 .

[13]  G. Corder,et al.  Costs and carbon emissions for geopolymer pastes in comparison to ordinary portland cement , 2011 .

[14]  C. Chen,et al.  Environmental impact of cement production: detail of the different processes and cement plant variability evaluation , 2010 .

[15]  Ranjit K. Roy,et al.  Design of Experiments Using The Taguchi Approach: 16 Steps to Product and Process Improvement , 2001 .

[16]  John L. Provis,et al.  Technical and commercial progress in the adoption of geopolymer cement , 2012 .

[17]  V. Rangan,et al.  Early Age Properties of Low-calcium Fly Ash Geopolymer Concrete Suitable for Ambient Curing☆ , 2015 .

[18]  M. Richardson,et al.  A study of the influence of slag alkali level on the alkali-silica reactivity of slag concrete , 2005 .

[19]  F. Goodarzi.  Characteristics and composition of fly ash from Canadian coal-fired power plants , 2006 .

[20]  Lynn Price,et al.  The CO2 abatement cost curve for the Thailand cement industry , 2010 .

[21]  T. Bakharev,et al.  Durability of Geopolymer Materials in Sodium and Magnesium Sulfate Solutions , 2005 .

[22]  John L. Provis,et al.  Effect of Calcium Silicate Sources on Geopolymerisation , 2008 .

[23]  S. Wallah,et al.  Creep Behaviour of Fly Ash-Based Geopolymer Concrete , 2010 .