Transient pupil constrictions to faces are sensitive to orientation and species.

Previous studies have reported transient pupil constrictions to basic visual attributes (e.g., color and movement) that are processed along the ventral and the dorsal pathways. Specific cortical areas are activated more for faces than most other types of stimuli, raising the possibility that stimulus-specific transient pupil constrictions might also occur for faces. Such pupil responses may be sensitive to stimulus orientation and species since these parameters have been found to affect electrophysiological and behavioral responses to faces. Here we show transient pupil constrictions to upright human faces that are greater than those to scrambled versions, inverted versions, or macaque monkey faces. Similar to findings from electrophysiological studies, the inversion effect occurred for human faces but not macaque faces. Collectively, our findings show that transient pupil constrictions to faces are sensitive to the same parameters that have been found to influence electrophysiological and behavioral measures of face processing (i.e., orientation and species) and thus reveal a novel, objective, and non-invasive method for studying face perception.

[1]  D. Perrett,et al.  Evidence accumulation in cell populations responsive to faces: an account of generalisation of recognition without mental transformations , 1998, Cognition.

[2]  Helmut Wilhelm,et al.  Pupil response components: studies in patients with Parinaud's syndrome. , 2002, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[3]  D. Perrett,et al.  Evidence from rhesus macaques suggests that male coloration plays a role in female primate mate choice , 2003, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[4]  S. Carey.  Becoming a face expert. , 1992, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[5]  R. Yin.  Looking at Upside-down Faces , 1969 .

[6]  D. Perrett,et al.  Visual neurones responsive to faces in the monkey temporal cortex , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[7]  Bernard Tiddeman,et al.  Prototyping and Transforming Facial Textures for Perception Research , 2001, IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications.

[8]  N. Kanwisher.  Domain specificity in face perception , 2000, Nature Neuroscience.

[9]  J L Barbur,et al.  PUPIL RESPONSE AS AN OBJECTIVE MEASURE OF VISUAL ACUITY * , 1987, Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians.

[10]  D. Perrett,et al.  Effects of sexual dimorphism on facial attractiveness , 1998, Nature.

[11]  Olivier Pascalis,et al.  Specialization of Neural Mechanisms Underlying Face Recognition in Human Infants , 2002, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[12]  A. Little,et al.  Category contingent aftereffects for faces of different races, ages and species , 2008, Cognition.

[13]  J L Barbur,et al.  Pupillary responses to stimulus structure, colour and movement , 1992, Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians.

[14]  H. Critchley,et al.  Pupillary contagion: central mechanisms engaged in sadness processing. , 2006, Social cognitive and affective neuroscience.

[15]  A. Ishai,et al.  Distributed and Overlapping Representations of Faces and Objects in Ventral Temporal Cortex , 2001, Science.

[16]  M. Tarr,et al.  FFA: a flexible fusiform area for subordinate-level visual processing automatized by expertise , 2000, Nature Neuroscience.

[17]  M. Djamgoz,et al.  Basic and Clinical Perspectives in Vision Research , 1995, Springer US.

[18]  D. Perrett,et al.  Facial shape and judgements of female attractiveness , 1994, Nature.

[19]  John L. Barbur,et al.  A Study of Pupil Response Components in Human Vision , 1995 .

[20]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  The Neural Basis of the Behavioral Face-Inversion Effect , 2005, Current Biology.

[21]  D. van Norren,et al.  Visual acuity measured with pupil responses to checkerboard stimuli. , 1980, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[22]  I. E. Loewenfeld,et al.  The Pupil: Anatomy, Physiology, and Clinical Applications , 1999 .

[23]  S. de Schonen,et al.  Effect of visual experience on face processing: a developmental study of inversion and non-native effects. , 2004, Developmental science.

[24]  Leslie G. Ungerleider,et al.  Distributed representation of objects in the human ventral visual pathway. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[25]  R. S. Young,et al.  Pupil responses to foveal exchange of monochromatic lights. , 1980, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[26]  G. Rhodes,et al.  Orientation-Contingent Face Aftereffects and Implications for Face-Coding Mechanisms , 2004, Current Biology.

[27]  L. Weiskrantz,et al.  Psychophysical and pupillometric study of spatial channels of visual processing in blindsight , 2002, Experimental Brain Research.

[28]  T. Allison,et al.  Electrophysiological Studies of Face Perception in Humans , 1996, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[29]  L Weiskrantz,et al.  Learning from the pupil: a spatial visual channel in the absence of V1 in monkey and human. , 1998, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[30]  Females, but Not Males, Show Greater Pupillary Response to Direct-Than Deviated-Gaze Faces , 2006, Perception.

[31]  Keiji Tanaka,et al.  Differences in onset latency of macaque inferotemporal neural responses to primate and non-primate faces. , 2005, Journal of neurophysiology.

[32]  J L Barbur,et al.  Visual processing levels revealed by response latencies to changes in different visual attributes , 1998, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[33]  D. Maurer,et al.  The many faces of configural processing , 2002, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[34]  J. Barbur,et al.  Pupil response triggered by the onset of coherent motion , 1997, Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology.