A “Wide” Variety: Effects of Horizontal versus Vertical Display on Assortment Processing, Perceived Variety, and Choice

The authors investigate how horizontal versus vertical displays of alternatives affect assortment processing, perceived variety, and subsequent choice. Horizontal (vs. vertical) displays are easier to process due to a match between the human binocular vision field (which is horizontal in direction) and the dominant direction of eye movements required for processing horizontal displays. It is demonstrated that this processing fluency allows people to browse information more efficiently, which increases perceived assortment variety and ultimately leads to more variety being chosen, and if the number of options chosen is allowed to vary, it leads to more options chosen. It is shown that because people see more variety in a horizontal (vs. vertical) display, they process a horizontal assortment more extensively. When more variety is positive, they find the choice task easier and have a higher level of satisfaction and confidence about their choices. When more variety is not necessarily positive, for example, in a choice of a single most-preferred option, these effects disappear. Two field studies, an eye-tracking study, and two lab studies support these conclusions.

[1]  Benjamin W. Tatler,et al.  Systematic tendencies in scene viewing , 2008 .

[2]  Margaret G. Meloy,et al.  The goal of consistency as a cause of information distortion. , 2008, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[3]  I. Gilchrist,et al.  Evidence for a systematic component within scan paths in visual search , 2006 .

[4]  Wayne D. Hoyer,et al.  Retail Assortment: More ≠ Better , 2006 .

[5]  R. Pieters,et al.  Eye-Movement Analysis of Search Effectiveness , 2008 .

[6]  M. F. Luce,et al.  Choosing to Avoid: Coping with Negatively Emotion-Laden Consumer Decisions , 1998 .

[7]  Leigh McAlister,et al.  Consumers’ Perceptions of the Assortment Offered in a Grocery Category: The Impact of Item Reduction: , 1998 .

[8]  Wayne D. Hoyer,et al.  Product: Retail assortment: More ≠ better , 2010 .

[9]  Priya Raghubir,et al.  Shelf space schemas: Myth or reality? ☆ , 2013 .

[10]  John G. Lynch,et al.  Reconsidering Baron and Kenny: Myths and Truths about Mediation Analysis , 2010 .

[11]  Leif D. Nelson,et al.  Data from Paper “False-Positive Psychology: Undisclosed Flexibility in Data Collection and Analysis Allows Presenting Anything as Significant” , 2014 .

[12]  Savannah Wei Shi,et al.  Information Acquisition During Online Decision Making: A Model-Based Exploration Using Eye-Tracking Data , 2013, Manag. Sci..

[13]  Els Gijsbrechts,et al.  Retail assortment, shelf and stockout management : Issues, interplay and future challenges , 2005 .

[14]  Stephen J. Hoch,et al.  Shelf management and space elasticity , 1994 .

[15]  Yoshinori Kawagoe,et al.  Neurology of the Ocular Muscles , 1948 .

[16]  K. Rayner.  The perceptual span and peripheral cues in reading , 1975, Cognitive Psychology.

[17]  Leigh McAlister,et al.  A Retailer Promotion Policy Model Considering Promotion Signal Sensitivity , 1993 .

[18]  Rolf Reber,et al.  Exploring “fringe” consciousness: The subjective experience of perceptual fluency and its objective bases , 2004, Consciousness and Cognition.

[19]  Eric T. Bradlow,et al.  Does In-Store Marketing Work? Effects of the Number and Position of Shelf Facings on Brand Attention and Evaluation at the Point of Purchase , 2009 .

[20]  Wayne D. Hoyer.  An Examination of Consumer Decision Making for a Common Repeat Purchase Product , 1984 .

[21]  Edward J. Fox,et al.  Why is Assortment Planning so Difficult for Retailers? A Framework and Research Agenda , 2009 .

[22]  Tatjana A. Nazir,et al.  Effects of lateral masking and spatial precueing on gap-resolution in central and peripheral vision , 1992, Vision Research.

[23]  N. Schwarz,et al.  Processing Fluency and Aesthetic Pleasure: Is Beauty in the Perceiver's Processing Experience? , 2004, Personality and social psychology review : an official journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

[24]  A. Tversky,et al.  Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases , 1974, Science.

[25]  Kristopher J Preacher,et al.  SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models , 2004, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.

[26]  B. Kröse,et al.  The control and speed of shifts of attention , 1989, Vision Research.

[27]  H. Collewijn,et al.  Binocular co‐ordination of human vertical saccadic eye movements. , 1988, The Journal of physiology.

[28]  Priya Raghubir,et al.  Position-based beliefs: The center-stage effect , 2009 .

[29]  Nikos Metallinos.  Television Aesthetics: Perceptual, Cognitive and Compositional Bases , 1996 .

[30]  C. Oatis,et al.  Incidence of common postural abnormalities in the cervical, shoulder, and thoracic regions and their association with pain in two age groups of healthy subjects. , 1992, Physical therapy.

[31]  B. Velichkovsky,et al.  Eye typing in application: A comparison of two interfacing systems with ALS patients , 2008 .

[32]  M. Lepper,et al.  The Construction of Preference: When Choice Is Demotivating: Can One Desire Too Much of a Good Thing? , 2006 .

[33]  Wayne D. Hoyer,et al.  Consumers’ Perceptions of the Assortment Offered in a Grocery Category: The Impact of Item Reduction , 1998 .

[34]  Peter R. Dickson,et al.  The Price Knowledge and Search of Supermarket Shoppers , 1990 .

[35]  Frank R. Kardes,et al.  Effects of Initial Product Judgments on Subsequent Memory-Based Judgments , 1986 .

[36]  K. Rayner.  Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research. , 1998, Psychological bulletin.

[37]  R. Näsänen,et al.  Eye movements in the visual search of word lists , 2002, Vision Research.

[38]  B. Kahn,et al.  The "visual preference heuristic": The influence of visual versus verbal depiction on assortment processing, perceived variety, and choice overload , 2014 .

[39]  S. Iyengar,et al.  The Mere Categorization Effect: How the Presence of Categories Increases Choosers' Perceptions of Assortment Variety and Outcome Satisfaction , 2008 .

[40]  Barbara E. Kahn,et al.  Perceptions of assortment variety: The effects of congruency between consumers’ internal and retailers’ external organization , 2005 .

[41]  A. Tversky,et al.  Judgment under Uncertainty , 1982 .

[42]  B. Kahn,et al.  The Influence of Assortment Structure on Perceived Variety and Consumption Quantities , 2004 .

[43]  Angela Y. Lee,et al.  Bringing the frame into focus: the influence of regulatory fit on processing fluency and persuasion. , 2004, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[44]  Eric T. Bradlow,et al.  The Variety of an Assortment , 1999 .