Modelling the effect of in-stream and overland dispersal on gene flow in river networks

Modelling gene flow across natural landscapes is a current challenge of population genetics. Models are essential to make clear predictions about conditions that cause genetic differentiation or maintain connectivity between populations. River networks are a special case of landscape matrix. They represent stretches of habitat connected according to a branching pattern where dispersal is usually limited to upstream or downstream movements. Because of their peculiar topology, and the increasing concern about conservation issues in hydrosystems, there has been a recent revival of interest in modelling dispersal in river networks. Network complexity has been shown to influence global population differentiation. However, geometric characteristics are likely to interact with the way individuals move across space. Studies have focused on in-stream movements. None of the work published so far took into consideration the ability of many species to disperse overland between branches of the same network though. We predicted that the relative contribution of these two dispersal modalities (in-stream and overland) would affect the overall genetic structure. We simulated dispersal in synthetic river networks using an individual-based model. We tested the effect of dispersal modalities, i.e. the ratio of overland/in-stream dispersal, and two geometric parameters, bifurcation angle between branches and network complexity. Data revealed that if geometrical parameters affected population differentiation, dispersal parameters had the strongest effect. Interestingly, we observed a quadratic relationship between p the proportion of overland dispersers and population differentiation. We interpret this U-shape pattern as a balance between isolation by distance caused by in-stream movements at low values of p and intense migrant exchanges within the same branching unit at high values of p. Our study is the first attempt to model out-of-network movements. It clearly shows that both geometric and dispersal parameters interact. Both should be taken into consideration in order to refine predictions about dispersal and gene flow in river network.

[1]  MARY E. POWER,et al.  Linking Scales in Stream Ecology , 2006 .

[2]  P. Auger,et al.  Annual spawning migrations in modelling brown trout population dynamics inside an arborescent river network , 2000 .

[3]  Marc Bélisle,et al.  MEASURING LANDSCAPE CONNECTIVITY: THE CHALLENGE OF BEHAVIORAL LANDSCAPE ECOLOGY , 2005 .

[4]  Don Edwards,et al.  Kriging in estuaries: as the crow flies, or as the fish swims? , 1997 .

[5]  D. Nickerson,et al.  The utility of single nucleotide polymorphisms in inferences of population history , 2003 .

[6]  M. Shaw,et al.  Assembling spatially explicit landscape models of pollen and spore dispersal by wind for risk assessment , 2006, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[7]  R. Horton.  EROSIONAL DEVELOPMENT OF STREAMS AND THEIR DRAINAGE BASINS; HYDROPHYSICAL APPROACH TO QUANTITATIVE MORPHOLOGY , 1945 .

[8]  Mark Bartlett,et al.  Landscape gene flow, coexistence and threshold effect: The case of genetically modified herbicide tolerant oilseed rape (Brassica napus) , 2007 .

[9]  S. Neuenschwander.  AQUASPLATCHE: a program to simulate genetic diversity in populations living in linear habitats , 2006 .

[10]  I. Rodríguez‐Iturbe,et al.  Comment on “On the fractal dimension of stream networks” by Paolo La Barbera and Renzo Rosso , 1990 .

[11]  W. Dietrich,et al.  Food webs in river networks , 2002, Ecological Research.

[12]  David R. Anderson,et al.  Model Selection and Multimodel Inference , 2003 .

[13]  G. Szalay.  A Genetic Differentiation , 1973 .

[14]  Stephen James Ormerod,et al.  Dispersal of adult aquatic insects in catchments of differing land use , 2004 .

[15]  A. N. Strahler.  Quantitative analysis of watershed geomorphology , 1957 .

[16]  F. Record.  On Gene Flow , 2020, Geographic Variation, Speciation and Clines. (MPB-10), Volume 10.

[17]  M. Whitlock,et al.  The effective size of a subdivided population. , 1997, Genetics.

[18]  G. Likens,et al.  Stable isotopes identify dispersal patterns of stonefly populations living along stream corridors , 2005 .

[19]  S. Bunn,et al.  Within-drainage population genetic structure of the freshwater fish Pseudomugil signifer (Pseudomugilidae) in northern Australia , 2001 .

[20]  R. Rosso,et al.  On the fractal dimension of stream networks , 1989 .

[21]  J. Ciborowski,et al.  Inland dispersal of adult aquatic insects , 1996 .

[22]  WINSOR H. LOWE,et al.  Landscape-Scale Spatial Population Dynamics in Human-Impacted Stream Systems , 2002, Environmental management.

[23]  L. Bernatchez,et al.  Consequences of unequal population size, asymmetric gene flow and sex‐biased dispersal on population structure in brook charr (Salvelinus fontinalis) , 2004, Molecular ecology.

[24]  S. Bunn,et al.  Genetic structure and dispersal of Macrobrachium australiense (Decapoda: Palaemonidae) in western Queensland, Australia , 2002 .

[25]  S. Pruett-Jones,et al.  Fluctuating Asymmetry, Sexual Selection, and Survivorship in Male Dark-Winged Damselflies , 2002 .

[26]  J. Secondi,et al.  In‐stream and overland dispersal across a river network influences gene flow in a freshwater insect, Calopteryx splendens , 2008, Molecular ecology.

[27]  S. Bunn,et al.  Gene Flow among Conspecific Populations of Baetis sp. (Ephemeroptera): Adult Flight and Larval Drift , 1995, Journal of the North American Benthological Society.

[28]  W. Fagan,et al.  Living in the branches: population dynamics and ecological processes in dendritic networks. , 2007, Ecology letters.

[29]  R. Raimond,et al.  Geographical variation of mitochondrial DNA between populations of the white-clawed crayfish Austropotamobius pallipes , 1997 .

[30]  Jacques Labonne,et al.  Linking dendritic network structures to population demogenetics: The downside of connectivity , 2008 .

[31]  L. Rissler,et al.  The Influence of Ecology and Genetics on Behavioral Variation in Salamander Populations across the Eastern Continental Divide , 2004, The American Naturalist.

[32]  Yolanda F. Wiersma,et al.  A new measure of longitudinal connectivity for stream networks , 2008, Landscape Ecology.

[33]  J. Freeland,et al.  Dispersal in freshwater invertebrates , 2001 .

[34]  T. Benton,et al.  Causes and consequences of animal dispersal strategies: relating individual behaviour to spatial dynamics , 2005, Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[35]  Renzo Rosso,et al.  Fractal relation of mainstream length to catchment area in river networks , 1991 .

[36]  Arthur J. Lembo,et al.  Predicting stream temperatures: geostatistical model comparison using alternative distance metrics , 2003 .

[37]  R. Vrijenhoek,et al.  Conservation Genetics in the Management of Desert Fishes , 1988 .

[38]  Stanley Sawyer,et al.  Isotropic random walks in a tree , 1978 .

[39]  David R. Anderson,et al.  Model selection and multimodel inference : a practical information-theoretic approach , 2003 .

[40]  Pierre Fontanillas,et al.  Landscape structure affects dispersal in the greater white-toothed shrew : Inference between genetic and simulated ecological distances , 2007 .

[41]  Z. Yin,et al.  A comparison of drainage networks derived from digital elevation models at two scales , 1998 .

[42]  Eric J. Gustafson,et al.  The Effect of Landscape Heterogeneity on the Probability of Patch Colonization , 1996 .

[43]  D. Skibinski,et al.  A comparison of genetic diversity levels in marine, freshwater, and anadromous fishes , 1994 .

[44]  P. Keim,et al.  Correlations between observed dispersal capabilities and patterns of genetic differentiation in populations of four aquatic insect species from the Arizona White Mountains, U.S.A. , 2002 .

[45]  P. Mather,et al.  Are populations of mayflies living in adjacent fish and fishless streams genetically differentiated , 2005 .

[46]  Montgomery Slatkin,et al.  Gene Flow in Natural Populations , 1985 .

[47]  R Gomulkiewicz,et al.  Coevolution between hosts and parasites with partially overlapping geographic ranges , 2003, Journal of evolutionary biology.

[48]  W. Fagan.  CONNECTIVITY, FRAGMENTATION, AND EXTINCTION RISK IN DENDRITIC METAPOPULATIONS , 2002 .

[49]  O. Ronce.  How Does It Feel to Be Like a Rolling Stone? Ten Questions About Dispersal Evolution , 2007 .

[50]  D. Hurwood,et al.  Nested clade analysis of the freshwater shrimp, Caridina zebra (Decapoda: Atyidae), from north‐eastern Australia , 2001, Molecular ecology.

[51]  H. Gibbs,et al.  Genetic Differentiation among Populations of the Rare Mayfly Siphlonisca aerodromia Needham , 1998, Journal of the North American Benthological Society.

[52]  Eric R. Ziegel,et al.  Generalized Linear Models , 2002, Technometrics.

[53]  Samuel A. Cushman,et al.  Gene Flow in Complex Landscapes: Testing Multiple Hypotheses with Causal Modeling , 2006, The American Naturalist.

[54]  D. Hurwood,et al.  Phylogeography of the freshwater fish, Mogurnda adspersa, in streams of northeastern Queensland, Australia: evidence for altered drainage patterns , 1998, Molecular ecology.

[55]  J. Hughes,et al.  Reconciling patterns of genetic variation with stream structure, earth history and biology in the Australian freshwater fish Craterocephalus stercusmuscarum (Atherinidae) , 2000, Molecular ecology.

[56]  Lisa M. Ganio,et al.  A geostatistical approach for describing spatial pattern in stream networks , 2005 .