Children use verb semantics to retreat from overgeneralization errors: A novel verb grammaticality judgment study

Abstract Whilst certain verbs may appear in both the intransitive inchoative and the transitive causative constructions (The ball rolled/The man rolled the ball), others may appear in only the former (The man laughed/*The joke laughed the man). Some accounts argue that children acquire these restrictions using only (or mainly) statistical learning mechanisms such as entrenchment and pre-emption. Others have argued that verb semantics are also important. To test these competing accounts, adults (Experiment 1) and children aged 5–6 and 9–10 (Experiment 2) were taught novel verbs designed to be construed — on the basis of their semantics — as either intransitive-only or alternating. In support of the latter claim, participants' grammaticality judgments revealed that even the youngest group respected these semantic constraints. Frequency (entrenchment) effects were observed for familiar, but not novel, verbs (Experiment 1). We interpret these findings in the light of a new theoretical account designed to yield effects of both verb semantics and entrenchment/pre-emption.

[1]  Anna L. Theakston,et al.  The role of entrenchment in children's and adults' performance on grammaticality judgment tasks , 2004 .

[2]  M. Haspelmath,et al.  More on the typology of inchoative/causative verb alternations , 1993 .

[3]  Anna L. Theakston,et al.  The distributed learning effect for children's acquisition of an abstract grammatical construction , 2006 .

[4]  Josef Ruppenhofer,et al.  Beyond alternations : a constructional model of the German applicative pattern , 2001 .

[5]  G. Marcus.  Negative evidence in language acquisition , 1993, Cognition.

[6]  Ewa Dąbrowska,et al.  Towards a lexically specific grammar of children’s question constructions , 2005 .

[7]  B. Ambridge,et al.  The island status of clausal complements: Evidence in favor of an information structure explanation , 2008 .

[8]  M. Tanenhaus,et al.  Acquiring and processing verb argument structure: Distributional learning in a miniature language , 2008, Cognitive Psychology.

[9]  C. Fillmore,et al.  Grammatical constructions and linguistic generalizations: The What's X doing Y? construction , 1999 .

[10]  Patricia J Brooks,et al.  Does preemption help children learn verb transitivity? , 2002, Journal of Child Language.

[11]  Jeffrey L. Elman,et al.  Default Generalisation in Connectionist Networks. , 1995 .

[12]  P. Wolff.  Direct causation in the linguistic coding and individuation of causal events , 2003, Cognition.

[13]  Ping Li,et al.  Competition : A Connectionist Model of the Learning of English Reversive Prefixes , 2010 .

[14]  Letitia R. Naigles,et al.  Learnability and Cognition: The Acquisition of Argument Structure , 1991 .

[15]  Melissa Bowerman,et al.  Argument structure and learnability: Is a solution in sight? , 1996 .

[16]  Kim Plunkett,et al.  A Connectionist Model of the Arabic Plural System , 1997 .

[17]  Caroline F. Rowland,et al.  A Semantics-Based Approach to the "No Negative Evidence" Problem , 2009, Cogn. Sci..

[18]  B. Ambridge,et al.  The effect of verb semantic class and verb frequency (entrenchment) on children’s and adults’ graded judgements of argument-structure overgeneralization errors , 2008, Cognition.

[19]  Joan L. Bybee,et al.  Regular morphology and the lexicon. , 1995 .

[20]  B. Levin.  Unaccusativity: At the Syntax-Lexical Semantics Interface , 1994 .

[21]  M. Tomasello,et al.  How Children Constrain Their Argument Structure Constructions. , 1999 .

[22]  J. Marcotte.  Causative alternation errors as event-driven construction paradigm completions , 2006 .

[23]  W. Bruce Croft,et al.  The Acquisition of the English Causative Alternation , 2008 .

[24]  Anatol Stefanowitsch,et al.  Negative entrenchment: A usage-based approach to negative evidence , 2008 .

[25]  Matthew Saxton,et al.  Negative evidence and negative feedback: immediate effects on the grammaticality of child speech , 2000 .

[26]  Julian M. Pine,et al.  Constructing a Language: A Usage-Based Theory of Language Acquisition. , 2004 .

[27]  F. Chang.  Symbolically speaking: a connectionist model of sentence production , 2002 .

[28]  E. Clark,et al.  Adult reformulations of child errors as negative evidence , 2003, Journal of Child Language.

[29]  B. Ambridge,et al.  Children's judgments of regular and irregular novel past-tense forms: new data on the English past-tense debate. , 2010, Developmental psychology.

[30]  M. Bowerman.  The 'no negative evidence' problem: How do children avoid constructing an overly general grammar? , 1988 .

[31]  B. MacWhinney.  A multiple process solution to the logical problem of language acquisition , 2004, Journal of Child Language.

[32]  M. J. Farrar,et al.  Negative Evidence and Grammatical Morpheme Acquisition. , 1992 .

[33]  Elena Lieven,et al.  Child Language Acquisition: Contrasting Theoretical Approaches , 2013 .

[34]  M. Bowerman.  Mapping thematic roles onto syntactic functions: are children helped by innate linking rules? , 1990 .

[35]  B. MacWhinney,et al.  The Competition Model and UG , 1994 .

[36]  Karen Van Hoek,et al.  Anaphora and Conceptual Structure , 1997 .

[37]  Elisabeth Rieken.  Radical construction grammar: Syntactic theory in typological perspective , 2009 .

[38]  B. MacWhinney,et al.  The Handbook of East Asian Psycholinguistics: The competition model , 2006 .

[39]  G. Dell,et al.  Becoming syntactic. , 2006, Psychological review.

[40]  B. Hayes,et al.  Rules vs. analogy in English past tenses: a computational/experimental study , 2003, Cognition.

[41]  A. Goldberg,et al.  Learning What NOT to Say: The Role of Statistical Preemption and Categorization in A-Adjective Production , 2011 .

[42]  R. Langacker.  Foundations of cognitive grammar , 1983 .

[43]  M. Tomasello,et al.  Young children's overgeneralizations with fixed transitivity verbs. , 1999, Child development.

[44]  C. Pye.  Experimenting with the Causative Alternation , 2005 .

[45]  Adele E. Goldberg,et al.  The partial productivity of constructions as induction , 2011 .

[46]  Richard Hudson,et al.  Foundations of cognitive grammar. Volume 1. Theoretical prerequisites , 1990 .