Towards application of life cycle sustainability analysis

There is an increasing need for expanding the scope of traditional life cycle studies to answer system-wide sustainability questions. This has resulted in a framework for life cycle sustainability analysis (LCSA). Since the framework was first published in 2009, as one of the outcomes of the CALCAS project, several views and considerations concerning the methodological approach have been published. However, until now practical experience with LCSA is very limited. This paper reports first efforts and experiences in bringing the LCSA framework into practice by assessing the sustainability of solar fuels. Starting point of the project is the hypotheses that new technologies can only be practically implemented if they fit into a socially, economically and ecologically sustainable context. The analysis therefore aims at identifying performance criteria which a new technology needs to fulfil in order to compete in the existing market. It is argued that a LCSA study should be initiated with a broad but relevant system description as the first of in total five steps Of this five step approach, the first – system description – is discussed here. The system description identifies and describes the technological description, the intended application of a technology, which share of specific demand for service will be met, which other technologies contribute in meeting this demand, the (relevant indicators for addressing )sustainable impacts of meeting the demand and developments over time. By doing so it provides a solid basis for further steps in the LCSA study.

[1]  Erwin M. Schau,et al.  Towards Life Cycle Sustainability Assessment , 2010 .

[2]  Anthony Halog,et al.  Advancing Integrated Systems Modelling Framework for Life Cycle Sustainability Assessment , 2011 .

[3]  Marzia Traverso,et al.  Towards a life cycle sustainability assessment: making informed choices on products , 2011 .

[4]  Masaaki Hirooka,et al.  Innovation Dynamism And Economic Growth: A Nonlinear Perspective , 2006 .

[5]  Masaaki Hirooka,et al.  Innovation Dynamism and Economic Growth , 2006 .

[6]  William E. Rees,et al.  An interregional ecological approach for modelling sustainability in a globalizing world???Reviewing existing approaches and emerging directions , 2010 .

[7]  Gjalt Huppes,et al.  Life cycle assessment: past, present, and future. , 2011, Environmental science & technology.

[8]  Reinout Heijungs,et al.  Life Cycle Sustainability Analysis , 2011 .

[9]  Gjalt Huppes,et al.  Life cycle assessment and sustainability analysis of products, materials and technologies. Toward a scientific framework for sustainability life cycle analysis , 2010 .

[10]  Hans Geerlings,et al.  Efficient production of solar fuel using existing large scale production technologies. , 2011, Environmental science & technology.

[11]  Annekatrin Lehmann,et al.  Life Cycle Costing in Sustainability Assessment—A Case Study of Remanufactured Alternators , 2011 .

[12]  M. Smolander,et al.  The sustainability of communicative packaging concepts in the food supply chain. A case study: part 2. Life cycle costing and sustainability assessment , 2011 .

[13]  Walter Kloepffer,et al.  Life cycle sustainability assessment of products , 2008 .

[14]  A. Zamagni Inclusion of economic mechanisms into life cycle analysis: Start with “framing the question” , 2010, Integrated environmental assessment and management.

[15]  Naohiro Matsui,et al.  Simplified life cycle sustainability assessment of mangrove management: a case of plantation on wastelands in Thailand. , 2010 .

[16]  Roland Clift,et al.  A Life-Cycle Approach to Characterising Environmental and Economic Impacts of Multifunctional Land-Use Systems: An Integrated Assessment in the UK , 2010 .

[17]  S. Gheewala,et al.  Sustainability Assessment of a Biorefinery Complex in Thailand , 2011 .

[18]  Diofantos G. Hadjimitsis,et al.  Proportioning of Steel Fibre Reinforced Concrete Mixes for Pavement Construction and Their Impact on Environment and Cost , 2011 .