Assessment of an Advanced Image-Based Technique to Calculate Virtual Monoenergetic Computed Tomographic Images From a Dual-Energy Examination to Improve Contrast-To-Noise Ratio in Examinations Using Iodinated Contrast Media

IntroductionFollowing the trend of low-radiation dose computed tomographic (CT) imaging, concerns regarding the detectability of low-contrast lesions have been growing. The goal of this research was to evaluate whether a new image-based algorithm (Mono+) for virtual monoenergetic imaging with a dual-energy CT scanner can improve the contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) and conspicuity of these low-contrast objects when using iodinated contrast media. Materials and MethodsFour circular phantoms of different diameter (10–40 cm) with an iodine insert at the center were scanned at a fixed radiation dose with different single- (80, 100, 120 kV) and dual-energy protocols (80/140 kV, 80/140 Sn kV, 100/140 Sn kV) using a dual-source CT system. In addition, an anthropomorphic abdominal phantom with different low-contrast lesions was scanned with the settings previously mentioned but also at only a half and a quarter of the initial dose. Dual-energy data were processed, and virtual monoenergetic images (range, 40–190 keV) were generated. Beside the established technique, a newly developed prototype algorithm to calculate monoenergetic images (Mono+) was used. To avoid noise increase at lower calculated energies, which is a known drawback of virtual monoenergetic images at low kilo electron-volt, a regional spatial frequency-based recombination of the high signal at lower energies and the superior noise properties at medium energies is performed to optimize CNR in case of Mono+ images. The CNR and low-contrast detectability were evaluated. ResultsFor all phantom sizes, the Mono+ technique provided increasing iodine CNR with decreasing kilo electron-volt, with the optimum CNR obtained at the lowest energy level of 40 keV. For all investigated phantom sizes, CNR of Mono+ images at low kilo electron-volt was superior to the CNR in single-energy images at an equivalent radiation dose and even higher than the CNR obtained with 80-kV protocols. In case of the anthropomorphic phantom, low-contrast detectability in monoenergetic images was, for all settings, similar to the circular phantoms, best for the voltage combination 80/140 Sn kV, irrespective of the dose level. For all dual-energy voltage combinations, the Mono+ algorithm led to superior results compared with single-energy imaging. DiscussionWith regard to optimized iodine CNR, it is more efficient to perform dual-energy scans and compute virtual monoenergetic images at 40 keV using the Mono+ technique than to perform low kilovolt scans. Given the improved CNR, the Mono+ algorithm could be very useful in improving both detection and differential diagnosis of abdominal lesions, specifically low-contrast lesions, as well as in other anatomical regions where improved iodine CNR is beneficial.

[1]  D. Brenner,et al.  Computed tomography--an increasing source of radiation exposure. , 2007, The New England journal of medicine.

[2]  D. Hough,et al.  Individualization of abdominopelvic CT protocols with lower tube voltage to reduce i.v. contrast dose or radiation dose. , 2013, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[3]  Sven-Göran Fransson,et al.  Nephrotoxic effects in high-risk patients undergoing angiography. , 2003, The New England journal of medicine.

[4]  S. Schoenberg,et al.  Optimization of Contrast Material Delivery for Dual-Energy Computed Tomography Pulmonary Angiography in Patients With Suspected Pulmonary Embolism , 2012, Investigative radiology.

[5]  E. Neri,et al.  80-kV pulmonary CT angiography with 40 mL of iodinated contrast material in lean patients: comparison of vascular enhancement with iodixanol (320 mg I/mL)and iomeprol (400 mg I/mL). , 2012, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[6]  P. Aspelin,et al.  Contrast induced nephropathy: updated ESUR Contrast Media Safety Committee guidelines , 2011, European Radiology.

[7]  K. Kodama,et al.  Coronary computed tomography angiography using ultra-low-dose contrast media: radiation dose and image quality , 2013, The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging.

[8]  A. Sodickson,et al.  Effects of patient size on radiation dose reduction and image quality in low-kVp CT pulmonary angiography performed with reduced IV contrast dose , 2012, Emergency Radiology.

[9]  Carol C Wu,et al.  Pulmonary 64-MDCT angiography with 30 mL of IV contrast material: vascular enhancement and image quality. , 2012, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[10]  Rainer Raupach,et al.  Automated Attenuation-Based Tube Potential Selection for Thoracoabdominal Computed Tomography Angiography: Improved Dose Effectiveness , 2011, Investigative radiology.

[11]  C. McCollough,et al.  Virtual monochromatic imaging in dual-source dual-energy CT: radiation dose and image quality. , 2011, Medical physics.

[12]  Natalie N. Braun,et al.  Strategies for reducing radiation dose in CT. , 2009, Radiologic clinics of North America.

[13]  Thomas Flohr,et al.  Lung perfusion with dual-energy multidetector-row CT (MDCT): feasibility for the evaluation of acute pulmonary embolism in 117 consecutive patients. , 2008, Academic radiology.

[14]  J. Damilakis,et al.  Effect of X-ray Tube Parameters and Iodine Concentration on Image Quality and Radiation Dose in Cerebral Pediatric and Adult CT Angiography: A Phantom Study , 2013, Investigative radiology.

[15]  ESUR BOARD,et al.  European Society of Urogenital Radiology (ESUR) , 2001, European Radiology.

[16]  James C. Williams,et al.  Noninvasive differentiation of uric acid versus non-uric acid kidney stones using dual-energy CT. , 2007, Academic radiology.

[17]  Ernst Klotz,et al.  Angiographic Reconstructions From Whole-Brain Perfusion CT for the Detection of Large Vessel Occlusion in Acute Stroke , 2012, Stroke.

[18]  Nancy A Obuchowski,et al.  Contrast-to-noise ratio and low-contrast object resolution on full- and low-dose MDCT: SAFIRE versus filtered back projection in a low-contrast object phantom and in the liver. , 2012, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[19]  D. Broga,et al.  Ionizing Radiation Exposure of the Population of the United States , 2009 .

[20]  Shuai Leng,et al.  Dual-energy CT-based monochromatic imaging. , 2012, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[21]  M. Reiser,et al.  Material differentiation by dual energy CT: initial experience , 2007, European Radiology.

[22]  Bernhard Schmidt,et al.  Radiation dose and image quality in pediatric CT: effect of technical factors and phantom size and shape. , 2004, Radiology.

[23]  G. Bastarrika,et al.  Low radiation and low-contrast dose pulmonary CT angiography: Comparison of 80 kVp/60 ml and 100 kVp/80 ml protocols. , 2012, Clinical radiology.

[24]  Y Cui,et al.  Which should be the routine cross-sectional reconstruction mode in spectral CT imaging: monochromatic or polychromatic? , 2012, The British journal of radiology.

[25]  Henrik S. Thomsen,et al.  Contrast media : safety issues and ESUR guidelines , 2009 .

[26]  Thomas Flohr,et al.  Spectral optimization of chest CT angiography with reduced iodine load: experience in 80 patients evaluated with dual-source, dual-energy CT. , 2013, Radiology.