Does hydrological connectivity improve modelling of coarse sediment delivery in upland environments

Modelling the delivery of landslide-generated sediment to channel networks is challenging due to uncertainty in the magnitude– frequency distribution of failures connected to the channel network. Here, we investigate a simplified treatment of hydrological connectivity as a means for improving identification of coarse sediment delivery to upland rivers. Sediment generation from hillslopes and channel banks and its delivery to the channel network are modelled based on a modified form of SHALSTAB coupled to a network index version of TOPMODEL. The network index treatment has two important hydrological effects: (a) it only allows saturated areas to connect to the hydrological network when there is full saturation along the associated flow path; and (2) overland flow associated with unconnected but saturated zones is assumed to remain within the catchment and to contribute to a reduction in the catchment-averaged saturation deficit. We use this hydrological treatment to restrict sediment delivery to situations where there is surface hydrological connection (i.e. saturation) along the complete flow path that connects failure areas to the drainage network. This represents an extreme restriction on the possibility of connected failure as it does not allow for failed material to connect if failures are associated with partial saturation or where delivery involves runout across areas where hydrological connection is not maintained. The impact of this restriction is assessed by comparing model predictions with field mapping of connected failures and data from continuously recording coarse sediment sensors, for two storm events. The hydrological connection requirement restricted connected failures to zones closer to the drainage network and resulted in a better level of agreement with the field mapped failures. Simulations suggested that in the study catchment the majority of sediment inputs occur from hydrologically-connected areas close to the channel network during moderate sized rainstorms that occur relatively frequently. © 2007 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

[1]  P. Carling,et al.  An instrument to record sediment movement in bedrock channels , 2003 .

[2]  R. Sidle,et al.  A distributed slope stability model for steep forested basins , 1995 .

[3]  D. Montgomery,et al.  Channel change and flooding, Skokomish River, Washington , 2001 .

[4]  Stuart N. Lane,et al.  A network‐index‐based version of TOPMODEL for use with high‐resolution digital topographic data , 2004 .

[5]  D. Montgomery,et al.  Hydrologic Processes in a Low-Gradient Source Area , 1995 .

[6]  P. Allen,et al.  Sediment flux from a mountain belt derived by landslide mapping , 1997 .

[7]  P. Bates,et al.  Effects of spatial resolution on a raster based model of flood flow , 2001 .

[8]  R. Sidle,et al.  A conceptual model of changes in root cohesion in response to vegetation management. , 1991 .

[9]  Tom J. Coulthard,et al.  Long-term and large scale high resolution catchment modelling: Innovations and challenges arising from the NERC Land Ocean Interaction Study (LOIS) , 2003 .

[10]  J. Warburton,et al.  Annual sediment budget of a uk mountain torrent , 2002 .

[11]  James S. Griffiths,et al.  Landslide hazard mapping and risk assessment , 2001, Geological Society, London, Engineering Geology Special Publication.

[12]  David R. Montgomery,et al.  A process-based model for colluvial soil depth and shallow landsliding using digital elevation data , 1995 .

[13]  B. Everitt.  The Cambridge Dictionary of Statistics , 1998 .

[14]  Karl-Heinz Schmidt,et al.  River channel adjustment and sediment budget in response to a catastrophic flood event (Lainbach catchment, Southern Bavaria) , 1994 .

[15]  M. Hirano,et al.  Rock control on magnitude-frequency distribution of landslide , 1995 .

[16]  Alexander L. Densmore,et al.  Topographic fingerprints of bedrock landslides , 2000 .

[17]  R. D. Black,et al.  Partial Area Contributions to Storm Runoff in a Small New England Watershed , 1970 .

[18]  R. Bagnold.  Experiments on a gravity-free dispersion of large solid spheres in a Newtonian fluid under shear , 1954, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences.

[19]  P. A. Cross,et al.  Lecture notes in Earth sciences: Vol. 12. S. Turner (Editor), Applied Geodesy VIII, Springer, Berlin, F.R.G., 1987, 393pp, DM78.00, ISBN 3 540 182195 , 1989 .

[20]  D. Tarboton.  A new method for the determination of flow directions and upslope areas in grid digital elevation models , 1997 .

[21]  A. Harvey.  The influence of sediment supply on the channel morphology of upland streams: Howgill Fells, Northwest England , 1991 .

[22]  Karl-Heinz Schmidt,et al.  Dynamics and Geomorphology of Mountain Rivers , 1994 .

[23]  David R. Montgomery,et al.  Piezometric response in shallow bedrock at CB1: Implications for runoff generation and landsliding , 2002 .

[24]  N. Hovius,et al.  Supply and Removal of Sediment in a Landslide‐Dominated Mountain Belt: Central Range, Taiwan , 2000, The Journal of Geology.

[25]  N Oreskes,et al.  Verification, Validation, and Confirmation of Numerical Models in the Earth Sciences , 1994, Science.

[26]  R. Cunjak.  Behaviour and Microhabitat of Young Atlantic Salmon (Salmo salar) during Winter , 1988 .

[27]  S. Lane,et al.  Urban fluvial flood modelling using a two‐dimensional diffusion‐wave treatment, part 1: mesh resolution effects , 2006 .

[28]  A. James.  Time and the persistence of alluvium: River engineering, fluvial geomorphology, and mining sediment in California , 1999 .

[29]  D. Montgomery,et al.  A physically based model for the topographic control on shallow landsliding , 1994 .

[30]  Douglas G. Altman,et al.  Practical statistics for medical research , 1990 .

[31]  Thomas Glade,et al.  Towards Establishing Climatic Thresholds for Slope Instability: Use of a Physically-based Combined Soil Hydrology-slope Stability Model , 2004 .

[32]  Nicholas Sitar,et al.  Hydrologic conditions leading to debris-flow initiation , 1990 .

[33]  K. Beven,et al.  A physically based, variable contributing area model of basin hydrology , 1979 .

[34]  James C. Bathurst,et al.  Physically based modelling of shallow landslide sediment yield at a catchment scale , 1998 .

[35]  A. Harvey,et al.  Coupling between hillslopes and channels in upland fluvial systems: implications for landscape sensitivity, illustrated from the Howgill Fells, northwest England , 2001 .

[36]  E. O'Loughlin,et al.  Saturation regions in catchments and their relations to soil and topographic properties , 1981 .

[37]  F. Legros.  The mobility of long-runout landslides , 2002 .

[38]  Timothy A. Quine,et al.  Fluvial Processes and Environmental Change , 1999 .

[39]  David M. Wolock,et al.  SIMULATING THE VARIABLE-SOURCE-AREA CONCEPT OF STREAMFLOW GENERATION WITH THE WATERSHED MODEL TOPMODEL , 1993 .

[40]  A. Harvey.  Effective timescales of coupling within fluvial systems , 2002 .

[41]  H. Kelsey.  A sediment budget and an analysis of geomorphic process in the Van Duzen River basin, north coastal California, 1941–1975: Summary , 1980 .

[42]  R. Saunders,et al.  Changes in the Selection of Microhabitat by Juvenile Atlantic Salmon (Salmo salar) at the Summer–Autumn Transition in a Small River , 1984 .

[43]  K. Richards,et al.  Approaches to the study of hillslope development due to mass movement , 1993 .

[44]  J. Nash,et al.  River flow forecasting through conceptual models part I — A discussion of principles☆ , 1970 .

[45]  Stuart N. Lane,et al.  The timing and magnitude of coarse sediment transport events within an upland, temperate gravel-bed river , 2007 .

[46]  Louise J. Bracken,et al.  The concept of hydrological connectivity and its contribution to understanding runoff‐dominated geomorphic systems , 2007 .

[47]  J. Heggenes,et al.  HABITAT SELECTION BY BROWN TROUT (SALMO TRUTTA) AND YOUNG ATLANTIC SALMON (S. SALAR) IN STREAMS: STATIC AND DYNAMIC HYDRAULIC MODELLING , 1996 .

[48]  P. J. Whiting,et al.  Bedload transport of fine gravel observed by motion-picture photography , 1988, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[49]  Long term hillslope and fluvial system modelling : concepts and case studies from the Rhine River catchment , 2003 .

[50]  David R. Montgomery,et al.  Regional test of a model for shallow landsliding , 1998 .

[51]  W. Dietrich,et al.  The contribution of bedrock groundwater flow to storm runoff and high pore pressure development in hollows , 1987 .

[52]  Yoichiro Fujii.  Frequency Distribution of the Magnitude of the Landslides Caused by Heavy Rain-Fall , 1969 .

[53]  P. Bates,et al.  Evaluation of 1D and 2D numerical models for predicting river flood inundation , 2002 .

[54]  S. P. Anderson,et al.  Hydrologic response of a steep, unchanneled valley to natural and applied rainfall , 1997 .

[55]  Jacob Cohen.  A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales , 1960 .

[56]  Keith Beven,et al.  Uniqueness of place and process representations in hydrological modelling , 2000 .

[57]  C. Joyce,et al.  Macroinvertebrate community changes at coarse sediment recruitment points along two gravel bed rivers , 2001 .

[58]  C. Paola,et al.  A cellular model of braided rivers , 1994, Nature.