Epicardial substrate mapping for ventricular tachycardia ablation in patients with non-ischaemic cardiomyopathy: a new algorithm to differentiate between scar and viable myocardium developed by simultaneous integration of computed tomography and contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging.

AIMS During epicardial electroanatomical mapping (EAM), it is difficult to differentiate between fibrosis and fat, as both exhibit attenuated bipolar voltage (BV). The purpose of this study was to assess whether unipolar voltage (UV), BV, and electrogram characteristics (EC) can distinguish fibrosis from viable myocardium and fat during epicardial EAM for ventricular tachycardia (VT) ablation in non-ischaemic cardiomyopathy (NICM). METHODS AND RESULTS Ten NICM patients (7 males, 56 ± 13 years) with VT underwent epicardial EAM with real-time integration of computed tomography-derived epicardial fat and contrast-enhanced MRI-derived scar. Bipolar voltage (filtered 30-400 Hz), UV (filtered 1-240 Hz), and EC (duration and morphology) were correlated with the presence of fat and scar. At sites devoid of fat, the optimal cutoff values to differentiate between scar and myocardium were 1.81 mV for BV and 7.95 mV for UV. Bipolar voltage, UV, and electrogram duration >50 ms distinguished scar from myocardium in areas covered with <2.8 mm fat (all P < 0.001), but not ≥ 2.8 mm fat. In contrast, electrogram morphology-characteristics could also detect scar covered with ≥ 2.8 mm fat (P = 0.001). A newly developed three-step algorithm combining electrogram morphology, duration, and UV could correctly identify scar with a sensitivity of 75%. Unipolar voltage but not BV could detect intramural scar in the absence of fat. CONCLUSIONS Both BV ≤ 1.81 mV and UV ≤ 7.95 mV are useful for detection of scar during epicardial EAM, in the absence of ≥ 2.8 mm fat. However, EC can be used to detect scar covered with fat. A newly developed algorithm combining UV and EC can differentiate between scar and viable myocardium. Unipolar voltage but not BV could detect intramural scar.

[1]  M. Schalij,et al.  Identification of successful catheter ablation sites in patients with ventricular tachycardia based on electrogram characteristics during sinus rhythm. , 2005, Heart rhythm.

[2]  Benoit Desjardins,et al.  Endocardial Unipolar Voltage Mapping to Detect Epicardial Ventricular Tachycardia Substrate in Patients With Nonischemic Left Ventricular Cardiomyopathy , 2011, Circulation: Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology.

[3]  Capelle,et al.  Slow conduction in the infarcted human heart. 'Zigzag' course of activation. , 1993, Circulation.

[4]  M. Janse,et al.  Fractionated electrograms in dilated cardiomyopathy: origin and relation to abnormal conduction. , 1996, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[5]  R. Ramirez,et al.  Distinguishing epicardial fat from scar: analysis of electrograms using high-density electroanatomic mapping in a novel porcine infarct model. , 2009, Heart rhythm.

[6]  Benoit Desjardins,et al.  Effect of epicardial fat on electroanatomical mapping and epicardial catheter ablation. , 2010, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[7]  R. Ramirez,et al.  Characterization of the arrhythmogenic substrate in ischemic and nonischemic cardiomyopathy implications for catheter ablation of hemodynamically unstable ventricular tachycardia. , 2010, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[8]  F. Marchlinski,et al.  Characterization of Endocardial Electrophysiological Substrate in Patients With Nonischemic Cardiomyopathy and Monomorphic Ventricular Tachycardia , 2003, Circulation.

[9]  Benoit Desjardins,et al.  Delayed-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in nonischemic cardiomyopathy: utility for identifying the ventricular arrhythmia substrate. , 2009, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[10]  Timm Dickfeld,et al.  MRI-Guided Ventricular Tachycardia Ablation: Integration of Late Gadolinium-Enhanced 3D Scar in Patients With Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillators , 2011, Circulation. Arrhythmia and electrophysiology.

[11]  Renu Virmani,et al.  A Scientific Statement from the American Heart Association, the American College of Cardiology, and the European Society of Cardiology , 2022 .

[12]  Katja Zeppenfeld,et al.  Head-to-head comparison of contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging and electroanatomical voltage mapping to assess post-infarct scar characteristics in patients with ventricular tachycardias: real-time image integration and reversed registration. , 2011, European heart journal.

[13]  Ó. Cano,et al.  Electroanatomic substrate and ablation outcome for suspected epicardial ventricular tachycardia in left ventricular nonischemic cardiomyopathy. , 2009, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[14]  R. Cury,et al.  Mapping epicardial fat with multi-detector computed tomography to facilitate percutaneous transepicardial arrhythmia ablation. , 2006, European journal of radiology.

[15]  F. Marchlinski,et al.  ECG Criteria to Identify Epicardial Ventricular Tachycardia in Nonischemic Cardiomyopathy , 2010, Circulation. Arrhythmia and electrophysiology.