The Impact of Price Promotions on a Brand's, Market Share, Sales Pattern and Profitability

A model of market response to price promotions reflecting consumer heterogeniety in preferences and promotion responsiveness shows that a brand's market share is effected by the relative frequency of its own promotions and by its preference profile among consumers: widely accepted, smaller preference brands are more likely to gain long run market share through promotion than are widely accepted higher preference brands, ceteris paribus. If consumers respond to promotions by stockpiling, a brand's unpromoted "baseline" sales are depressed by its own promotions. If consumers respond to promotions by increasing the probability of choosing the promoted brand, a brand's unpromoted "baseline" sales are depressed by competitive brands' promotions. The overall profitability of offering price promotions is shown to depend upon the mix of consumers in the marketplace. Consumers who do not respond to promotions and those who respond to promotions by stockpiling the brand they would have chosen anyway decrease the overall profitability of offering promotions. Consumers who respond to promotions by switching to the promoted brand or by buying and consuming more of the promoted brand than they would have had there been no promotion tend to increase the overall profitability of offering promotions. The model is operationalized using UPC scanner panel data on coffee purchases.

[1]  Carol A. Scott The Effects of Trial and Incentives on Repeat Purchase Behavior , 1976 .

[2]  Subrata K. Sen,et al.  Market Segments and Stochastic Brand Choice Models , 1976 .

[3]  Randall G. Chapaaan,et al.  Exploiting Rank Ordered Choice Set Data within the Stochastic Utility Model , 1982 .

[4]  R. Duncan Luce,et al.  Individual Choice Behavior: A Theoretical Analysis , 1979 .

[5]  Robert C. Blattberg,et al.  A Theoretical and Empirical Evaluation of Price Deals for Consumer Nondurables , 2007 .

[6]  Frederick E. Webster,et al.  The “Deal-Prone” Consumer , 1965 .

[7]  John D. C. Little,et al.  A Logit Model of Brand Choice Calibrated on Scanner Data , 2011, Mark. Sci..

[8]  Robert C. Blattberg,et al.  Identifying the Deal Prone Segment , 1978 .

[9]  C. Seipel Premiums—Forgotten by Theory , 1971 .

[10]  William F. Massy,et al.  Short Term Price and Dealing Effects in Selected Market Segments , 1965 .

[11]  J. Quelch,et al.  Consumer Promotions and the Acceleration of Product Purchases , 1985 .

[12]  Stanley R. Thompson Sales Response To Generic Promotion Efforts And Some Implications Of Milk Advertising On Economic Surplus , 1974 .

[13]  Scott A. Neslin,et al.  A Model for Evaluating the Profitability of Coupon Promotions , 1983 .

[14]  David B. Montgomery,et al.  Consumer Characteristics Associated with Dealing: An Empirical Example , 1971 .

[15]  Doyle L. Weiss,et al.  Logically Consistent Market Share Models II , 1976 .

[16]  R. Strang,et al.  Sales promotion - fast growth, faulty management , 1976 .

[17]  William C. Gaidis,et al.  Behavioral Learning Theory: Its Relevance to Marketing and Promotions , 1981 .

[18]  M. Chevalier Increase in Sales Due to In-Store Display , 1975 .

[19]  Subrata K. Sen,et al.  Market Segmentation Using Models of Multidimensional Purchasing Behavior , 1974 .

[20]  William F. Massy,et al.  Purchasing Behavior and Personal Attributes , 1968 .

[21]  C. Narasimhan A Price Discrimination Theory of Coupons , 1984 .

[22]  E. M. Babb,et al.  Consumer Response to Promotional Deals , 1978 .

[23]  Alice M. Tybout,et al.  Impact of Deals and Deal Retraction on Brand Switching , 1978 .