Network-Based Correlated Correspondence for Unsupervised Domain Adaptation of Hyperspectral Satellite Images

Adapting a model to changes in the data distribution is a relevant problem in machine learning and pattern recognition since such changes degrade the performances of classifiers trained on undistorted samples. This paper tackles the problem of domain adaptation in the context of hyper spectral satellite image analysis. We propose a new correlated correspondence algorithm based on network analysis. The algorithm finds a matching between two distributions, which preserves the geometrical and topological information of the corresponding graphs. We evaluate the performance of the algorithm on a shadow compensation problem in hyper spectral image analysis: the land use classification obtained with the compensated data is improved.

[1]  Sebastian Thrun,et al.  The Correlated Correspondence Algorithm for Unsupervised Registration of Nonrigid Surfaces , 2004, NIPS.

[2]  Gustavo Camps-Valls,et al.  Semisupervised Manifold Alignment of Multimodal Remote Sensing Images , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[3]  Jon Atli Benediktsson,et al.  Land-Cover Mapping by Markov Modeling of Spatial–Contextual Information in Very-High-Resolution Remote Sensing Images , 2013, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[4]  Paul Scheunders,et al.  Domain adaptation with Hidden Markov Random Fields , 2013, 2013 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium - IGARSS.

[5]  S. Mahadevan,et al.  Manifold Alignment without Correspondence , 2009, IJCAI.

[6]  Melba M. Crawford,et al.  Manifold-Learning-Based Feature Extraction for Classification of Hyperspectral Data: A Review of Advances in Manifold Learning , 2014, IEEE Signal Processing Magazine.

[7]  Luis Gómez-Chova,et al.  Graph Matching for Adaptation in Remote Sensing , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[8]  Chang Wang,et al.  Manifold Alignment , 2011 .

[9]  Horst Bunke,et al.  Error Correcting Graph Matching: On the Influence of the Underlying Cost Function , 1999, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[10]  Judea Pearl,et al.  Probabilistic reasoning in intelligent systems - networks of plausible inference , 1991, Morgan Kaufmann series in representation and reasoning.

[11]  V. Latora,et al.  Centrality measures in spatial networks of urban streets. , 2005, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[12]  Melba M. Crawford,et al.  Manifold learning based feature extraction for classification of hyper-spectral data , 2013 .

[13]  Saurabh Prasad,et al.  Report on the 2013 IEEE GRSS Data Fusion Contest: Fusion of Hyperspectral and LiDAR Data [Technical Committees] , 2013 .

[14]  Richard Szeliski,et al.  A Comparative Study of Energy Minimization Methods for Markov Random Fields , 2006, ECCV.

[15]  Jon Atli Benediktsson,et al.  Advances in Spectral-Spatial Classification of Hyperspectral Images , 2013, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[16]  Jon Atli Benediktsson,et al.  Advances in Hyperspectral Image Classification: Earth Monitoring with Statistical Learning Methods , 2013, IEEE Signal Processing Magazine.

[17]  Neil D. Lawrence,et al.  Dataset Shift in Machine Learning , 2009 .

[18]  Vladimir Kolmogorov,et al.  Convergent Tree-Reweighted Message Passing for Energy Minimization , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[19]  I. Hassan.  Embedded , 2005, The Cyber Security Handbook.

[20]  Chang Wang,et al.  Heterogeneous Domain Adaptation Using Manifold Alignment , 2011, IJCAI.