Extent of inertia caused by the existing building stock against an energy transition in the Netherlands

Abstract Thirty percent of the total worldwide energy is consumed by the residential sector, making it a very significant frontier for energy transitions for sustainability. While the Netherlands aims to achieve a remarkable reduction in the energy consumption in residential buildings with policies mainly aiming at new constructions; little attention is being paid to the existing stock, and this existing stock creates inertia against a transition. Although this is a widely accepted issue, the extent of such inertia has not been analyzed explicitly. In that respect, this study is a preliminary study that aims to demonstrate the importance of the existing housing stock, and the inertia it can cause against an energy transition. Besides, policy options such as increasing efficiency standards for new constructions and increasing the turnover rate of the existing stock are evaluated through simulation experiments using the model developed for the Dutch system. The set of experiments discussed in the paper provides a better understanding about this inertia, as well as what needs to be done for achieving significant progress in a residential energy transition.

[1]  D. Charlier,et al.  Evaluation of the impact of environmental public policy measures on energy consumption and greenhouse gas emissions in the French residential sector , 2012 .

[2]  Shady Attia,et al.  Development of benchmark models for the Egyptian residential buildings sector , 2012 .

[3]  H. Hens,et al.  Impact of energy efficiency measures on the CO2 emissions in the residential sector, a large scale analysis , 2001 .

[4]  Hans Auer,et al.  The impact of consumer behavior on residential energy demand for space heating , 1998 .

[5]  K. Steemers,et al.  Household energy consumption: a study of the role of occupants , 2009 .

[6]  Yaman Barlas,et al.  Formal aspects of model validity and validation in system dynamics , 1996 .

[7]  Fabian Kesicki,et al.  Costs and potentials of reducing CO2 emissions in the UK domestic stock from a systems perspective , 2012 .

[8]  David J. Spiegelhalter,et al.  Handling uncertainty in housing stock models , 2012 .

[9]  V. Ismet Ugursal,et al.  Modeling of end-use energy consumption in the residential sector: A review of modeling techniques , 2009 .

[10]  Sukumar Natarajan,et al.  Domestic futures--Which way to a low-carbon housing stock? , 2007 .

[11]  V. I. Ugursal,et al.  A residential end‐use energy consumption model for Canada , 1998 .

[12]  Robert Lowe,et al.  An exploration of the technical feasibility of achieving CO2 emission reductions in excess of 60% within the UK housing stock by the year 2050 , 2005 .

[13]  M. M. Sunikka,et al.  Policies for improving energy efficiency in the European housing stock , 2006 .

[14]  F. Meijer,et al.  Towards a Sustainable Northern European Housing Stock: Figures, Facts and Future , 2009 .

[15]  H. Priemus How to Make Housing Sustainable? The Dutch Experience , 2005 .

[16]  Bodil Merethe Larsen,et al.  The flexibility of household electricity demand over time , 2001 .

[17]  Koen Steemers,et al.  Modelling domestic energy consumption at district scale: A tool to support national and local energy policies , 2011, Environ. Model. Softw..

[18]  Sukumar Natarajan,et al.  Predicting future UK housing stock and carbon emissions , 2007 .

[19]  Céline Guivarch,et al.  Exploring the potential for energy conservation in French households through hybrid modeling , 2012 .

[20]  D. Greene,et al.  Energy efficiency and consumption — the rebound effect — a survey , 2000 .

[21]  J.-P.A. Snäkin An engineering model for heating energy and emission assessment The case of North Karelia, Finland , 2000 .

[22]  Gönenç Yücel,et al.  An Objective-Based Perspective on Assessment of Model-Supported Policy Processes , 2009, J. Artif. Soc. Soc. Simul..

[23]  Luis Pérez-Lombard,et al.  A review on buildings energy consumption information , 2008 .

[24]  Emily M. Ryan,et al.  Validation of building energy modeling tools under idealized and realistic conditions , 2012 .

[25]  Henk Visscher,et al.  The effect of occupancy and building characteristics on energy use for space and water heating in Dutch residential stock , 2009 .

[26]  Bradford F. Mills,et al.  Residential Energy-Efficient Technology Adoption, Energy Conservation, Knowledge, and Attitudes: An Analysis of European Countries , 2012 .

[27]  Dejan Mumovic,et al.  A review of bottom-up building stock models for energy consumption in the residential sector , 2010 .

[28]  John D. Sterman,et al.  System Dynamics: Systems Thinking and Modeling for a Complex World , 2002 .

[29]  Brian Ó Gallachóir,et al.  Modelling the impacts of building regulations and a property bubble on residential space and water h , 2011 .

[30]  P.G.M. Boonekamp,et al.  Price elasticities, policy measures and actual developments in household energy consumption - A bottom up analysis for the Netherlands , 2007 .

[31]  W.M.C. Beerepoot,et al.  Energy policy instruments and technical change in the residential building sector , 2007 .

[32]  P. Berkhout,et al.  Defining the rebound effect , 2000 .

[33]  Gerda Klunder Sustainable Solutions for Dutch Housing: Reducing the Environmental Impacts of New And Existing Houses , 2005 .