Policy options to improve the effectiveness of the EU emissions trading system: A multi-criteria analysis

This paper considers several policy options which have been proposed to improve the functioning of the ETS. These options require an intervention either on the ETS cap (−30% target, set-aside, carbon central bank, long-term target) or on the carbon price (European and national price floor). We analyse the impact of each policy on the ETS carbon price and emissions. A multi-criteria evaluation method is applied to compare the policy options against a plurality of environmental, economic and procedural criteria. We find that the final ranking depends on the goals to be achieved, i.e., the relative weights attributed to the criteria. When policymakers want mainly to support the carbon price both in the short and long-run, while improving ETS flexibility and harmonization, the CCB and the EU price floor are, respectively ranked as first and second-best options. As the preference for environmental and implementation goals gradually increases, the position of the EU price floor and CCB options tend to invert. The −30% target should be adopted when reducing emissions is the priority goal, while a national price floor is the worst option, in this case. Nevertheless, self-interested States looking for a relatively quick, feasible solution, may find it optimal.

[1]  M. Thring World Energy Outlook , 1977 .

[2]  C. Hepburn,et al.  Emissions Trading and Profit-Neutral Grandfathering , 2006 .

[3]  Naim Afgan,et al.  Multi-criteria evaluation of natural gas resources , 2007 .

[4]  Cameron Hepburn,et al.  REGULATION BY PRICES, QUANTITIES, OR BOTH: A REVIEW OF INSTRUMENT , 2006 .

[5]  Naim Afgan,et al.  Multi-criteria evaluation of hydrogen and natural gas fuelled power plant technologies , 2009 .

[6]  K. Neuhoff,et al.  CO2 cost pass-through and windfall profits in the power sector , 2006 .

[7]  Danae Diakoulaki,et al.  Multi-criteria decision analysis and cost–benefit analysis of alternative scenarios for the power generation sector in Greece , 2007 .

[8]  Pantelis Capros,et al.  Analysis of the EU policy package on climate change and renewables , 2011 .

[9]  Julien Chevallier,et al.  European Carbon Prices and Banking Restrictions: Evidence from Phase I (2005-2007) , 2009 .

[10]  Julien Chevallier,et al.  Carbon futures and macroeconomic risk factors : a view from the EU ETS , 2009 .

[11]  Oligopoly meets oligopsony: The case of permits , 2009 .

[12]  Julien Chevallier,et al.  Price drivers and structural breaks in European carbon prices 2005–2007 , 2008 .

[13]  M Grubb,et al.  Strengthening the EU ETS: creating a stable platform for energy sector investment , 2012 .

[14]  Catrinus Jepma,et al.  A framework on interactions of climate and energy policy instruments , 2007 .

[15]  K. S Johannsen,et al.  Combining voluntary agreements and taxes — an evaluation of the Danish agreement scheme on energy efficiency in industry , 2002 .

[16]  Cédric Philibert,et al.  Considering the options: climate targets for all countries , 2001 .

[17]  Steve Sorrell,et al.  White certificate schemes: Economic analysis and interactions with the EU ETS , 2009 .

[18]  Scott Barrett,et al.  Thirteen plus one: a comparison of global climate policy architectures , 2003 .

[19]  Nain H. Afgan,et al.  Sustainability assessment of a hybrid energy system , 2008 .

[20]  Popi Konidari,et al.  A multi-criteria evaluation method for climate change mitigation policy instruments , 2007 .

[21]  The EU Emissions Trading Scheme: Disentangling the Effects of Industrial Production and CO2 Emissions on Carbon Prices , 2008 .

[22]  Cristian Dinca,et al.  A multi-criteria approach to evaluate the natural gas energy systems , 2007 .

[23]  Michael Grubb,et al.  Allocation and competitiveness in the EU emissions trading scheme: policy overview , 2006 .

[24]  Jiangjiang Wang,et al.  Review on multi-criteria decision analysis aid in sustainable energy decision-making , 2009 .

[25]  C. Perthuis Carbon markets regulation : the case for a CO2 Central Bank , 2011 .