Ultra-processing. An odd ‘appraisal’

Abstract It is now generally agreed that the impact of the current nature, purpose and extent of food processing on human well-being, health and disease needs to be better understood and explained, in order to improve public health. The special issue of Public Health Nutrition devoted to the concept of ultra-processing of food, and the NOVA classification of which ultra-processed foods are one category, is a great step forward in this work. Coincidentally, a polemical ‘critical appraisal’ of ultra-processing was recently published in another journal. Debate and discussion are an essential part of the scientific endeavour. In this commentary, we correct inaccurate statements made about NOVA in the ‘appraisal,’ rebut points raised, and discuss the larger issue of scientific responsibility for publishing opposing views on controversial topics.

[1]  E. Gibney,et al.  Ultra-processed foods in human health: a critical appraisal. , 2017, The American journal of clinical nutrition.

[2]  M. Touvier,et al.  Contribution of ultra-processed foods in the diet of adults from the French NutriNet-Santé study , 2017, Public Health Nutrition.

[3]  R. Levy,et al.  The UN Decade of Nutrition, the NOVA food classification and the trouble with ultra-processing , 2017, Public Health Nutrition.

[4]  C. Monteiro,et al.  Association between Dietary Share of Ultra-Processed Foods and Urinary Concentrations of Phytoestrogens in the US , 2017, Nutrients.

[5]  B. Swinburn,et al.  The share of ultra-processed foods and the overall nutritional quality of diets in the US: evidence from a nationally representative cross-sectional study , 2017, Population Health Metrics.

[6]  C. Monteiro,et al.  Consumption of ultra-processed foods predicts diet quality in Canada , 2017, Appetite.

[7]  M. Martínez-González,et al.  Ultra‐Processed Food Consumption and the Incidence of Hypertension in a Mediterranean Cohort: The Seguimiento Universidad de Navarra Project , 2016, American journal of hypertension.

[8]  M. Martínez-González,et al.  Ultraprocessed food consumption and risk of overweight and obesity: the University of Navarra Follow-Up (SUN) cohort study. , 2016, The American journal of clinical nutrition.

[9]  D. Mozaffarian,et al.  Ultra-processed foods and added sugars in the US diet: evidence from a nationally representative cross-sectional study , 2016, BMJ Open.

[10]  J. Moubarac,et al.  Impact of ultra-processed foods on micronutrient content in the Brazilian diet , 2015, Revista de saude publica.

[11]  R. Levy,et al.  Dietary guidelines to nourish humanity and the planet in the twenty-first century. A blueprint from Brazil , 2015, Public Health Nutrition.

[12]  J. Moubarac,et al.  Ultra-processed foods and the nutritional dietary profile in Brazil , 2015, Revista de saude publica.

[13]  D L Katz,et al.  Can we say what diet is best for health? , 2014, Annual review of public health.

[14]  R. Levy,et al.  International differences in cost and consumption of ready-to-consume food and drink products: United Kingdom and Brazil, 2008–2009 , 2013, Global public health.

[15]  B. Neal,et al.  Profits and pandemics: prevention of harmful effects of tobacco, alcohol, and ultra-processed food and drink industries , 2013, The Lancet.

[16]  Dariush Mozaffarian,et al.  Dietary guidelines in the 21st century--a time for food. , 2010, JAMA.

[17]  C. Monteiro,et al.  Nutrition and health. The issue is not food, nor nutrients, so much as processing , 2009, Public Health Nutrition.