A Wavelet-Predominant Algorithm Can Evaluate Quality of THz Security Image and Identify Its Usability

This paper presents an aggregate wavelet-predominant algorithm to measure the distortions in THz security images. The algorithm integrates a spectral-based sharpness estimator, a noise estimator derived alpha-stable model and an overall viewing experience estimator based on free-energy principle. Among them, the greater weight is assigned to the spectral-based sharpness estimator considering that the main quality factor in THz security image is sharpness. To verify the feasibility of the proposed metric, we construct the THz security image dataset including a total of 181 THz security images, and each image has the mean opinion score (MOS) collected via subjective quality evaluation experiment. Quantitative experimental results on the constructed THz security image dataset show that the aggregate wavelet-predominant estimator produces the promising overall performance for the estimation of MOS values, with PLCC, SROCC, and RMSE of 0.900, 0.873, and 0.386, respectively. This performance is superior to other opinion-unaware approaches, viz., FISBLIM, SISBLIM, NIQE, CPBD, SINE, S3, FISH, and noise estimator. The determination coefficient ( ${R} ^{{2}}$ ) of linear regression between reference and predicted MOSs is 0.81. The result of Bland–Altman analysis further validates that the aggregate wavelet-predominant estimator can substitute for the subjective IQA of THz security image, with approximately 94.5% of data points locating within the limits of agreement. For usability identification, the wavelet-predominant estimator gives the satisfactory results, with accuracy, precision, recall rate, and false positive rate of 84.0%, 79.8%, 95.0%, and 29.6%, respectively. Furthermore, the potential application perspectives of the proposed metric can refer to commercial applications (guarantee THz security images of good quality) and scientific researches (assist in software development for THz security image analysis). The dataset is available at https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.7700123.v3. Possible researches on this dataset may include the development of THz quality standards, the selection of the best display mode, the enhancement of images, the modeling of image noise, and the detection of prohibited goods.

[1]  Lei Zhang,et al.  Blind Image Quality Assessment Using Joint Statistics of Gradient Magnitude and Laplacian Features , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[2]  Sébastien Marcel,et al.  Image Quality Assessment for Fake Biometric Detection: Application to Iris, Fingerprint, and Face Recognition , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[3]  Weisi Lin,et al.  A Psychovisual Quality Metric in Free-Energy Principle , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[4]  Ross S. Eaton,et al.  Perceived X-ray image quality for baggage screening , 2015, 2015 IEEE Applied Imagery Pattern Recognition Workshop (AIPR).

[5]  Wen Gao,et al.  Blind Quality Assessment of Tone-Mapped Images Via Analysis of Information, Naturalness, and Structure , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Multimedia.

[6]  Sugato Chakravarty,et al.  Methodology for the subjective assessment of the quality of television pictures , 1995 .

[7]  Raveendran Paramesran,et al.  Review of medical image quality assessment , 2016, Biomed. Signal Process. Control..

[8]  Gang Liu,et al.  Image quality assessment software of security screening system , 2008, 2008 42nd Annual IEEE International Carnahan Conference on Security Technology.

[9]  Damon M. Chandler,et al.  ${\bf S}_{3}$: A Spectral and Spatial Measure of Local Perceived Sharpness in Natural Images , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[10]  Phong V. Vu,et al.  A Fast Wavelet-Based Algorithm for Global and Local Image Sharpness Estimation , 2012, IEEE Signal Processing Letters.

[11]  Yair Weiss,et al.  Scale invariance and noise in natural images , 2009, 2009 IEEE 12th International Conference on Computer Vision.

[12]  Alan C. Bovik,et al.  Making a “Completely Blind” Image Quality Analyzer , 2013, IEEE Signal Processing Letters.

[13]  Wenjun Zhang,et al.  FISBLIM: A FIve-Step BLInd Metric for quality assessment of multiply distorted images , 2013, SiPS 2013 Proceedings.

[14]  Alan C. Bovik,et al.  A Statistical Evaluation of Recent Full Reference Image Quality Assessment Algorithms , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[15]  Lina J. Karam,et al.  A No-Reference Image Blur Metric Based on the Cumulative Probability of Blur Detection (CPBD) , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[16]  Daryoosh Saeedkia,et al.  Handbook of terahertz technology for imaging, sensing and communications , 2013 .

[17]  Shutao Li,et al.  Near Infrared Face Image Quality Assessment System of Video Sequences , 2011, 2011 Sixth International Conference on Image and Graphics.

[18]  S. Saranya,et al.  Fake biometric detection using image quality assessment: Application to iris, fingerprint recognition , 2016, 2016 Second International Conference on Science Technology Engineering and Management (ICONSTEM).

[19]  Zhang Cunlin,et al.  Terahertz Science and Technology , 2009 .

[20]  I. Daubechies,et al.  Biorthogonal bases of compactly supported wavelets , 1992 .

[21]  Andrew Carkeet,et al.  Confidence and coverage for Bland–Altman limits of agreement and their approximate confidence intervals , 2018, Statistical methods in medical research.

[22]  A. V. Postnikov,et al.  Terahertz imaging technique for cancer diagnostics using frequency conversion by gold nano-objects , 2017 .

[23]  Hak-Sung Kim,et al.  Non-contact measurement of the electrical conductivity and coverage density of silver nanowires for transparent electrodes using Terahertz spectroscopy , 2017 .

[24]  Wenjun Zhang,et al.  Using Free Energy Principle For Blind Image Quality Assessment , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Multimedia.

[25]  Alan C. Bovik,et al.  No-Reference Image Quality Assessment in the Spatial Domain , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[26]  Wenhan Zhu,et al.  Terahertz Security Image Quality Assessment by No-reference Model Observers , 2017, IFTC.

[27]  Wenjun Zhang,et al.  Hybrid No-Reference Quality Metric for Singly and Multiply Distorted Images , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Broadcasting.

[28]  Wei Shi,et al.  Enhancing terahertz image quality by finite impulse response digital filter , 2014, 2014 39th International Conference on Infrared, Millimeter, and Terahertz waves (IRMMW-THz).

[29]  Eero P. Simoncelli,et al.  Image quality assessment: from error visibility to structural similarity , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[30]  Christophe Charrier,et al.  Blind Image Quality Assessment: A Natural Scene Statistics Approach in the DCT Domain , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[31]  Pietro Perona,et al.  Graph-Based Visual Saliency , 2006, NIPS.

[32]  Gonzalo R. Arce,et al.  Nonlinear Signal Processing - A Statistical Approach , 2004 .

[33]  K. Satya Prasad,et al.  SVM classification for fake biometric detection using image quality assessment: Application to iris, face and palm print , 2016, 2016 International Conference on Inventive Computation Technologies (ICICT).

[34]  Masayoshi Tonouchi,et al.  Cutting-edge terahertz technology , 2007 .

[35]  Carlo Sirtori,et al.  Applied physics: Bridge for the terahertz gap , 2002, Nature.

[36]  Wenhan Zhu,et al.  How Do Detected Objects Affect the Noise Distribution of Terahertz Security Images? , 2018, IEEE Access.

[37]  J. Federici,et al.  THz imaging and sensing for security applications—explosives, weapons and drugs , 2005 .

[38]  J. M. Chamberlain,et al.  Evaluation of image quality in terahertz pulsed imaging using test objects. , 2002, Physics in medicine and biology.

[39]  O. Seeberg Statistical Mechanics. — A Set of Lectures , 1975 .

[40]  Alan C. Bovik,et al.  Blind Image Quality Assessment: From Natural Scene Statistics to Perceptual Quality , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.