Electrical characteristics of 2D and 3D microelectrodes for high-resolution retinal prostheses

In order to provide high quality visual information to patients who have implanted retinal prosthetic devices, the number of microelectrode should be large. As the number of microelectrode is increased, the dimension of the microelectrode is decreased, which in turn results in the increased interface impedance of microelectrode and decreased dynamic range of injection current. In addition, the reduced maximum limit of injection current may not be sufficiently large to stimulate the ganglion cells in a retina. In order to improve the trade-off envelope between number of microelectrode and current injection limit, a 3D microelectrode structure can be used as an alternative. From the advancement of microfabrication technology, the fabrication of highly-accurate 3D structures with small dimensions is possible. This paper presents a first comprehensive electrical characterization of 2D and 3D microelectrodes for high-resolution retinal prostheses. Microelectrodes which differ in shapes and diameters are analyzed. Their interface impedances and charge injection limits are quantitatively analyzed. This research can be used to define requirements for further retinal prosthetic device research.

[1]  Benjamin Rappaz,et al.  Simulation of artificial vision, III: do the spatial or temporal characteristics of stimulus pixelization really matter? , 2005, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[2]  D. Cho,et al.  Mechanical and electrical evaluation for the long-term stability of implanted 3D retinal microelectrode , 2011, 2011 16th International Solid-State Sensors, Actuators and Microsystems Conference.

[3]  B. Jones,et al.  Retinal remodeling during retinal degeneration. , 2005, Experimental eye research.

[4]  Samip P. Shah,et al.  Electrical properties of retinal–electrode interface , 2007, Journal of neural engineering.

[5]  E. Zrenner,et al.  Can subretinal microphotodiodes successfully replace degenerated photoreceptors? , 1999, Vision Research.

[6]  Alfred Stett,et al.  Subretinal electronic chips allow blind patients to read letters and combine them to words , 2010, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[7]  R. Klein,et al.  Causes and prevalence of visual impairment among adults in the United States. , 2004, Archives of ophthalmology.

[8]  D Hickingbotham,et al.  Bipolar surface electrical stimulation of the vertebrate retina. , 1994, Archives of ophthalmology.

[9]  Dong-Il Cho,et al.  Multi-channel stimulator IC using a channel sharing method for retinal prostheses. , 2013, Journal of biomedical nanotechnology.

[10]  Dong-Il Cho,et al.  A Novel In Vitro Sensing Configuration for Retinal Physiology Analysis of a Sub-Retinal Prosthesis , 2012, Sensors.

[11]  So Hyun Bae,et al.  Arrowhead-Shaped Microelectrodes Fabricated on a Flexible Substrate for Enhancing the Spherical Conformity of Retinal Prostheses , 2011, Journal of Microelectromechanical Systems.

[12]  Linh Hoang,et al.  An Integrated 256-Channel Epiretinal Prosthesis , 2010, IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits.

[13]  Tetsu Tanaka,et al.  Comparison of electrode materials for the use of retinal prosthesis. , 2011, Bio-medical materials and engineering.