Perspectives on CO2 capture and storage

The last decade has seen a signifi cant increase in the research and development of CO2 capture and storage (CCS) technology. CCS is now considered to be one of the key options for climate change mitigation. This perspective provides a brief summary of the state of the art regarding CCS development and discusses the implications for the further development of CCS, particularly with respect to climate change policy. The aim is to provide general perspectives on CCS, although examples used to illustrate the prospects for CCS are mainly taken from Europe. The rationale for developing CCS should be the over-abundance of fossil fuel reserves (and resources) in a climate change context. However, CCS will only be implemented if society is willing to attach a suffi ciently high price to CO2 emissions. Although arguments have been put forward both in favor and against CCS, the author of this perspective argues that the most important outcome from the successful commercialization of CCS will be that fossil-fuel-dependent economies will fi nd it easier to comply with stringent greenhouse gas (GHG) reduction targets. In contrast, failure to implement CCS will require that the global community agrees almost immediately to start phasing out the use of fossil fuels; such an agreement seems more unrealistic than reaching a global agreement on stringent GHG reductions. Thus, in the near term, it is crucial to initiate demonstration projects, such as those supported by the EU. If this is not done, there is a risk that the introduction of CCS will be signifi cantly delayed. Among the stakeholders in CCS technologies (R&D actors in industry and academia), the year 2020 is typically considered to be the year in which CCS will be commercially available. Considering the lead times for CCS development and the slow pace of implementation of climate policy (post-Copenhagen), the target year of 2020 seems rather optimistic.

[1]  Stephen W. Pacala,et al.  Global Constraints on Reservoir Leakage , 2003 .

[2]  A L Robinson,et al.  Assessment of potential carbon dioxide reductions due to biomass-coal cofiring in the United States. , 2003, Environmental science & technology.

[3]  Filip Johnsson,et al.  Co-firing biomass with coal for electricity generation—An assessment of the potential in EU27 , 2009 .

[4]  David W. Keith,et al.  Carbon storage: the economic efficiency of storing CO2 in leaky reservoirs , 2003 .

[5]  Jinyue Yan,et al.  Potential market niches for biomass energy with CO2 capture and storage—Opportunities for energy supply with negative CO2 emissions , 2003 .

[6]  Alexander Wokaun,et al.  Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies , 1999 .

[7]  Peta Ashworth,et al.  An integrated roadmap of communication activities around carbon capture and storage in Australia and beyond , 2009 .

[8]  Sally M. Benson,et al.  Implications of Surface Seepage on the Effectiveness of Geologic Storage of Carbon Dioxide as a Climate Change Mitigation Strategy , 2002 .

[9]  James J. Dooley,et al.  Comparing Existing Pipeline Networks with the Potential Scale of Future U.S. CO2 Pipeline Networks , 2009 .

[10]  John L. Bradshaw,et al.  CO2 storage capacity estimation: Issues and development of standards , 2007 .

[11]  Barbara Praetorius,et al.  Greenhouse Gas Mitigation in a Carbon Constrained World: The Role of Carbon Capture and Storage , 2008 .

[12]  Filip Johnsson,et al.  Ramp-up of CO2 capture and storage within Europe , 2008 .

[13]  Filip Johnsson,et al.  Prospects for CO2 capture in European industry , 2011 .

[14]  H. Herzog,et al.  American exceptionalism? Similarities and differences in national attitudes toward energy policy and global warming. , 2006, Environmental science & technology.

[15]  Martha Lien,et al.  A field laboratory for monitoring CO2 leakage , 2009 .

[16]  Curtis M. Oldenburg,et al.  Certification framework based on effective trapping for geologic carbon sequestration , 2009 .

[17]  Petter E. Røkke,et al.  Techno-Economic Evaluations and Benchmarking of Pre-combustion CO2 Capture and Oxy-fuel Processes Developed in the European ENCAP Project , 2009 .

[18]  Mohammad. M. Hossain,et al.  Chemical-looping combustion (CLC) for inherent CO2 separations—a review , 2008 .

[19]  Melisa F. Pollak,et al.  Research for deployment: incorporating risk, regulation, and liability for carbon capture and sequestration. , 2007, Environmental science & technology.

[20]  Peta Ashworth,et al.  From research to action: now we have to move on CCS communication , 2010 .

[21]  M. Zoback,et al.  Seismic detection of CO2 leakage along monitoring wellbores , 2010 .

[22]  David William Keith,et al.  Engineering economic analysis of biomass IGCC with carbon capture and storage , 2005 .

[23]  Behdad Moghtaderi,et al.  An overview on oxyfuel coal combustion—State of the art research and technology development , 2009 .

[24]  Rickard Svensson,et al.  Transportation systems for CO2––application to carbon capture and storage , 2004 .

[25]  Filip Johnsson,et al.  Pathways for the European electricity supply system to 2050—The role of CCS to meet stringent CO2 reduction targets , 2010 .

[26]  C. Bouallou,et al.  Pre-combustion, post-combustion and oxy-combustion in thermal power plant for CO2 capture , 2010 .

[27]  J. Gibbins,et al.  Preparing for global rollout: A ‘developed country first’ demonstration programme for rapid CCS deployment , 2008 .

[28]  B. Zwaan,et al.  Economics of geological CO2 storage and leakage , 2008 .

[29]  Ton Wildenborg,et al.  Designing a cost-effective CO2 storage infrastructure using a GIS based linear optimization energy model , 2010, Environ. Model. Softw..

[30]  Scott Jiusto,et al.  Assessing innovation in emerging energy technologies: Socio-technical dynamics of carbon capture and storage (CCS) and enhanced geothermal systems (EGS) in the USA , 2010 .

[31]  Filip Johnsson,et al.  Ramp-up of large-scale CCS infrastructure in Europe , 2009 .

[32]  Guang Q. Wang,et al.  Progress on Higee distillation—Introduction to a new device and its industrial applications , 2011 .

[33]  B. Metz,et al.  Global learning on carbon capture and storage: A call for strong international cooperation on CCS demonstration , 2009 .

[34]  He Fang,et al.  Advancements in Development of Chemical-Looping Combustion: A Review , 2009 .

[35]  James J. Dooley,et al.  Large-scale utilization of biomass energy and carbon dioxide capture and storage in the transport and electricity sectors under stringent CO2 concentration limit scenarios , 2010 .

[36]  M. Granger Morgan Guest Comment: Needed: a few new coal plants , 2008 .

[37]  F. Johnsson,et al.  Pathways for the North European electricity supply , 2009 .

[38]  Edward S. Rubin,et al.  An engineering-economic model of pipeline transport of CO2 with application to carbon capture and storage , 2008 .

[39]  P. A. Jensen,et al.  Oxy-fuel combustion of solid fuels , 2010 .

[40]  Mikael Höök,et al.  Global coal production outlooks based on a logistic model , 2010 .