A feasibility study developing an integrated testing strategy assessing skin irritation potential of chemicals.

The regulatory assessment of chemical safety is still driven by hazard testing in animals. The Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and restriction of Chemicals (REACH) legislation and new technologies require a shift in the way in which safety assessments are conducted. Integrated testing strategies (ITSs) help in providing such a framework. Many of the ITS building blocks are already in use, but the concepts for their integration and application in a regulatory setting have yet to be fully implemented. This paper describes a feasibility study investigating how a combination of in silico, in vitro, and in vivo information could be applied in the assessment of skin irritation hazard. Therefore, a database of 100 existing and new chemicals was compiled. A number of strategies, both animal-free and inclusive of animal data were constructed and subsequently evaluated considering predictive capacities, severity of misclassifications and testing costs. Comparison of constructed ITS based on these assessment parameters identified best performing strategies for chemical classification. However, defining the in vivo test as the reference test limited the evaluation of the ITS inclusive of animal data. This study demonstrated that ITS can be constructed, evaluated and compared in a systematic fashion. To promote ITS, further guidance on construction and multi-parameter evaluation need to be developed.

[1]  Theo Vermeire,et al.  Risk assessment of chemicals : an introduction , 2007 .

[2]  M. Pavan,et al.  The role of the European Chemicals Bureau in promoting the regulatory use of (Q)SAR methods , 2007, SAR and QSAR in environmental research.

[3]  John D. Walker,et al.  Use of QSARs in international decision-making frameworks to predict health effects of chemical substances. , 2003, Environmental health perspectives.

[4]  E. Keeler,et al.  Primer on certain elements of medical decision making. , 1975, The New England journal of medicine.

[5]  Y. T. van der Schouw,et al.  Guidelines for the Assessment of New Diagnostic Tests , 1995, Investigative radiology.

[6]  H Stryhn,et al.  Conditional dependence between tests affects the diagnosis and surveillance of animal diseases. , 2000, Preventive veterinary medicine.

[7]  Jose Cotovio,et al.  The In Vitro Acute Skin Irritation of Chemicals: Optimisation of the EPISKIN Prediction Model within the Framework of the ECVAM Validation Process , 2005, Alternatives to laboratory animals : ATLA.

[8]  D. Basketter,et al.  Comparison of human skin irritation and photo-irritation patch test data with cellular in vitro assays and animal in vivo data , 2008 .

[9]  Gallegos Saliner Ana,et al.  Testing Strategies for the Prediction of Skin and Eye Irritation and Corrosion for Regulatory Purposes , 2007 .

[10]  Xiao-Hua Zhou,et al.  Statistical Methods in Diagnostic Medicine , 2002 .

[11]  Sebastian Hoffmann,et al.  Skin irritation: prevalence, variability, and regulatory classification of existing in vivo data from industrial chemicals. , 2005, Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP.

[12]  Elisabeth Schmidt,et al.  The EpiDerm Test Protocol for the Upcoming ECVAM Validation Study on In Vitro Skin Irritation Tests — An Assessment of the Performance of the Optimised Test , 2005, Alternatives to laboratory animals : ATLA.

[13]  B J Blaauboer,et al.  An alternative approach for the safety evaluation of new and existing chemicals, an exercise in integrated testing. , 2005, Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP.

[14]  I Gerner,et al.  The ECVAM International Validation Study on In Vitro Tests for Skin Corrosivity. 1. Selection and Distribution of the Test Chemicals. , 1998, Toxicology in vitro : an international journal published in association with BIBRA.

[15]  Andrew P. Worth,et al.  An Evaluation of the Proposed OECD Testing Strategy for Skin Corrosion , 1998, Alternatives to laboratory animals : ATLA.

[16]  Horst Spielmann,et al.  Optimisation of the EpiDerm test protocol for the upcoming ECVAM validation study on in vitro skin irritation tests. , 2004, ALTEX.

[17]  Sebastian Hoffmann,et al.  Diagnosis: toxic!--trying to apply approaches of clinical diagnostics and prevalence in toxicology considerations. , 2005, Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology.

[18]  D M Bagley,et al.  Eye irritation: Reference chemicals data bank. , 1992, Toxicology in vitro : an international journal published in association with BIBRA.

[19]  M. Pavan,et al.  Evaluation of SARs for the prediction of skin irritation/corrosion potential–structural inclusion rules in the BfR decision support system , 2007, SAR and QSAR in environmental research.

[20]  C S Weil,et al.  Study of intra- and interlaboratory variability in the results of rabbit eye and skin irritation tests. , 1971, Toxicology and applied pharmacology.

[21]  Valérie Zuang,et al.  The usefulness of toxicogenomics for predicting acute skin irritation on in vitro reconstructed human epidermis. , 2007, Toxicology.

[22]  T Hartung,et al.  Toward an evidence-based toxicology , 2006, Human & experimental toxicology.

[23]  Andrew P. Worth,et al.  A Review of (Q)SAR Models for Skin and Eye Irritation and Corrosion , 2008 .

[24]  Christina Grindon,et al.  A review of the status of alternative approaches to animal testing and the development of integrated testing strategies for assessing the toxicity of chemicals under REACH--a summary of a DEFRA-funded project conducted by Liverpool John Moores University and FRAME. , 2006, Alternatives to laboratory animals : ATLA.

[25]  S. Bradbury,et al.  Meeting the scientific needs of ecological risk assessment in a regulatory context. , 2004, Environmental science & technology.

[26]  David A Basketter,et al.  In vitro skin irritation: facts and future. State of the art review of mechanisms and models. , 2004, Toxicology in vitro : an international journal published in association with BIBRA.

[27]  Valérie Zuang,et al.  The ECVAM International Validation Study on In Vitro Tests for Acute Skin Irritation: Selection of Test Chemicals , 2007, Alternatives to laboratory animals : ATLA.

[28]  M. Bracher,et al.  Predictive ability of reconstructed human epidermis equivalents for the assessment of skin irritation of cosmetics. , 2002, Toxicology in vitro : an international journal published in association with BIBRA.

[29]  Andrew P. Worth,et al.  Review of Literature-Based Models for Skin and Eye Irritation and Corrosion , 2006 .

[30]  David A Basketter,et al.  Determination of skin irritation potential in the human 4‐h patch test , 2004, Contact dermatitis.

[31]  J. Hengstler,et al.  The REACH concept and its impact on toxicological sciences. , 2006, Toxicology.

[32]  Andrew P. Worth,et al.  Intelligent Testing Strategies , 2007 .

[33]  Sac-fry Stages,et al.  OECD GUIDELINE FOR TESTING OF CHEMICALS , 2002 .

[34]  R Roguet,et al.  A prevalidation study on in vitro tests for acute skin irritation. results and evaluation by the Management Team. , 2001, Toxicology in vitro : an international journal published in association with BIBRA.

[35]  Theo Vermeire,et al.  Risk assessment of chemicals , 2021, Bioanalytical Tools in Water Quality Assessment.

[36]  I Gerner,et al.  Development of a Decision Support System for the Introduction of Alternative Methods into Local Irritancy/Corrosivity Testing Strategies. Creation of Fundamental Rules for a Decision Support System , 2000, Alternatives to laboratory animals : ATLA.