Patterns of river width and surface area revealed by the satellite‐derived North American River Width data set

As hydraulic, hydrologic, and biogeochemical models evolve toward greater spatial resolution and larger extent, robust morphometric data sets are essential to constrain their results. Here we present the Landsat-derived North American River Width (NARWidth) data set, the first fine-resolution, continental scale river centerline and width database. NARWidth contains measurements of >2.4 × 105 km of rivers wider than 30 m at mean annual discharge. We find that conventional digital elevation model-derived width data sets underestimate the abundance of wide rivers. To calculate the total surface area of North American rivers, we extrapolate the strong observed relationship between river width and total surface area at different river widths (r2 > 0.99 for 100–2000 m widths) to narrower rivers and streams. We conservatively estimate the total surface area of North American rivers as 1.24−0.15+0.39 × 105 km2 (1σ confidence intervals), values 20−15+38% greater than previous estimates used to evaluate greenhouse gas efflux from rivers to the atmosphere.

[1]  E. Davidson,et al.  Dissolved CO2 in small catchment streams of eastern Amazonia: A minor pathway of terrestrial carbon loss , 2010 .

[2]  Chris C. Park.  World-wide variations in hydraulic geometry exponents of stream channels: An analysis and some observations , 1977 .

[3]  K. Verdin,et al.  New Global Hydrography Derived From Spaceborne Elevation Data , 2008 .

[4]  R. Beighley,et al.  Developing channel and floodplain dimensions with limited data: a case study in the Amazon Basin , 2011 .

[5]  R. Horton.  EROSIONAL DEVELOPMENT OF STREAMS AND THEIR DRAINAGE BASINS; HYDROPHYSICAL APPROACH TO QUANTITATIVE MORPHOLOGY , 1945 .

[6]  Mark E. J. Newman,et al.  Power-Law Distributions in Empirical Data , 2007, SIAM Rev..

[7]  R. Ferguson.  Hydraulics and hydraulic geometry , 1986 .

[8]  Michael Church,et al.  GEOMORPHOLOGY OF STEEPLAND HEADWATERS: THE TRANSITION FROM HILLSLOPES TO CHANNELS 1 , 2005 .

[9]  D. Rosgen.  A classification of natural rivers , 1994 .

[10]  R. Welcomme.  Some general and theoretical considerations on the fish yield of African rivers , 1976 .

[11]  Y. Sheng,et al.  An automated scheme for glacial lake dynamics mapping using Landsat imagery and digital elevation models: a case study in the Himalayas , 2012 .

[12]  P. Raymond,et al.  Significant efflux of carbon dioxide from streams and rivers in the United States , 2011 .

[13]  Laurence C. Smith,et al.  RivWidth: A Software Tool for the Calculation of River Widths From Remotely Sensed Imagery , 2008, IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters.

[14]  Dai Yamazaki,et al.  Development of the Global Width Database for Large Rivers , 2014 .

[15]  C. Gleason,et al.  Toward global mapping of river discharge using satellite images and at-many-stations hydraulic geometry , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[16]  D. Lague.  The stream power river incision model: evidence, theory and beyond , 2014 .

[17]  M. Morisawa.  Quantitative Geomorphology of Some Watersheds in the Appalachian Plateau , 1962 .

[18]  A. N. Strahler.  Quantitative analysis of watershed geomorphology , 1957 .

[19]  P. Bates,et al.  A subgrid channel model for simulating river hydraulics and floodplain inundation over large and data sparse areas , 2012 .

[20]  B. Enquist,et al.  On estimating the exponent of power-law frequency distributions. , 2008, Ecology.

[21]  James P. Verdin,et al.  A topological system for delineation and codification of the Earth's river basins , 1999 .

[22]  M. Bayani Cardenas,et al.  Lateral hyporheic exchange throughout the Mississippi River network , 2014 .

[23]  B. Wehrli.  Biogeochemistry: Conduits of the carbon cycle , 2013, Nature.

[24]  E. Wohl.  Limits of downstream hydraulic geometry , 2004 .

[25]  C. Spearman.  The proof and measurement of association between two things. , 2015, International journal of epidemiology.

[26]  Judson W. Harvey,et al.  A hydrogeomorphic river network model predicts where and why hyporheic exchange is important in large basins , 2014 .

[27]  L. Smith,et al.  Estimation of Discharge From Three Braided Rivers Using Synthetic Aperture Radar Satellite Imagery: Potential Application to Ungaged Basins , 1996 .

[28]  Brent M. Troutman,et al.  Characterization of the spatial variability of channel morphology , 2002 .

[29]  Patrick M. Crill,et al.  Freshwater Methane Emissions Offset the Continental Carbon Sink , 2011, Science.

[30]  T. Pavelsky,et al.  Spatial Patterns of River Width in the Yukon River Basin , 2014 .

[31]  P. Sen.  Estimates of the Regression Coefficient Based on Kendall's Tau , 1968 .

[32]  C. Spearman.  The proof and measurement of association between two things. By C. Spearman, 1904. , 1987, The American journal of psychology.

[33]  Hanqiu Xu.  Modification of normalised difference water index (NDWI) to enhance open water features in remotely sensed imagery , 2006 .

[34]  Colin S Gillespie,et al.  Fitting Heavy Tailed Distributions: The poweRlaw Package , 2014, 1407.3492.

[35]  Guy Schumann,et al.  A simple global river bankfull width and depth database , 2013 .

[36]  Tamlin M. Pavelsky,et al.  Quantifying river form variations in the Mississippi Basin using remotely sensed imagery , 2014 .

[37]  P. Ciais,et al.  Global carbon dioxide emissions from inland waters , 2013, Nature.

[38]  William H. McDowell,et al.  Global abundance and size distribution of streams and rivers , 2012 .

[39]  James W. Kirchner,et al.  Dynamic, discontinuous stream networks: hydrologically driven variations in active drainage density, flowing channels and stream order , 2014 .

[40]  Tamlin M. Pavelsky,et al.  Lithologic and tectonic controls on bedrock channel form at the northwest Himalayan front , 2013 .

[41]  F. O'Loughlin,et al.  Hydraulic characterization of the middle reach of the Congo River , 2013 .

[42]  Michael Durand,et al.  Assessing the potential global extent of SWOT river discharge observations , 2014 .