Microsoft vs. Apple: Resilience against Distributed Denial-of-Service Attacks

Both Microsoft's Windows 7 and Apple's Snow Leopard operating systems claim to provide users with a safer and more reliable environment, but no work has evaluated and compared their resilience against common DDoS attack traffic. The authors compare the effect of this type of attack traffic on both systems installed on the same iMac hardware platform under the same network attack conditions. In particular, they consider common DDoS traffic at different layers of the TCP/IP protocol stack-namely, ARP flood, ping flood, and TCP-SYN flood attacks, which correspond to layers 2, 3, and 4, respectively. Interestingly, the iMac computer with its native Snow Leopard system was found to exhaust more computing resources when compared to that of Windows 7 installed on the same platform and under the same attack conditions.

[1]  Sanjeev Kumar,et al.  Denial of Service Due to Direct and Indirect ARP Storm Attacks in LAN Environment , 2010, J. Information Security.

[2]  Sanjeev Kumar,et al.  PING attack - How bad is it? , 2006, Comput. Secur..

[3]  Sanjeev Kumar,et al.  Is Apple's iMac Leopard Operating System Secure under ARP-Based Flooding Attacks? , 2010, 2010 Fifth International Conference on Internet Monitoring and Protection.

[4]  Sanjeev Kumar,et al.  Mitigation of TCP-SYN Attacks with Microsoft's Windows XP Service Pack2 (SP2) Software , 2008, Seventh International Conference on Networking (icn 2008).

[5]  Sanjeev Kumar,et al.  Experimental Evaluation of Juniper Network's Netscreen-5GT Security Device against Layer4 Flood Attacks , 2011, J. Information Security.