Comparison of different diagnostic products for skin prick testing.

BACKGROUND Different in vivo methods are used to quantify the amount of allergens in products for skin prick testing. It is unclear how this impacts on the correct diagnosis of allergies. AIM OF THE STUDY We compared the allergenic potency of three commercial extracts for skin prick testing and evaluated batch-to-batch differences within each product. METHODS Patients with a mono-sensitization (specific IgE level > 0,70 KU/L, ImmunoCAP, Phadia) to Phleum pratense (N=21), Parietaria judaica (N=20) or Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus (N=28) were evaluated by standard skin prick testing and with the end-point dilution technique using commercial products from Stallergenes (A) (Antony, France), Lofarma Allergeni (B) (Milan, Italy) and ALK Abellò (C) (Hoersholm, Denmark). Results were expressed as mean areas of the wheal (cut-off for positive reactions: 7 mm2). RESULTS With standard prick testing, the following differences in wheal areas were found: Phleum, C higher than B (p=0.0454); Parietaria, C higher than A (p=0.094); Dermatophagoides, C higher than A (p=0.021). With limiting dilution testing, the following differences in dilutions yielding positive skin prick tests were found: Phleum, C and B higher than A (p=0.0391 and 0.0039, respectively); Dermatophagoides, C higher than A and B (p=0.0010 and 0.0156, respectively). In the batch-to-batch comparison, mean differences between wheal areas of compared undiluted solutions did not significantly differ in any allergen tested, although in single cases large differences were observed. At the 1 to 64 dilution, agreement was significant only with Dermatophagoides from Manufacturer C (p= 0.262). At the 1 to 16 dilution, agreement was significant with Phleum from Manufacturer C (p=0.0116) and with Dermatophagoides from Manufacturer B and C (p=0.0239 and 0.0001, respectively). At the 1 to 4 dilution agreement was significant with Dermatophagoides from the three considered Manufacturers (p=0.0189, 0.0052 and 0.0077, respectively) and with Phleum from Manufacturer B and C (p=0.0336 and 0.0113, respectively). CONCLUSION There are significant differences among commercially available diagnostic products for skin prick testing.

[1]  R. Ree,et al.  Indoor allergens: relevance of major allergen measurements and standardization. , 2007, The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology.

[2]  S. Vieths,et al.  Mediator release assays based on human or murine immunoglobulin E in allergen standardization , 2007, Clinical and experimental allergy : journal of the British Society for Allergy and Clinical Immunology.

[3]  M. Barreto,et al.  Allergen skin weal/radioallergosorbent test relationship in childhood populations that differ in histamine skin reactivity: a multi‐national survey , 2005, Clinical and experimental allergy : journal of the British Society for Allergy and Clinical Immunology.

[4]  M. Barreto,et al.  Skin Reactivity to Histamine and Codeine in Unselected 9-Year-Old Children from Italy, Poland and Libya , 2004, International Archives of Allergy and Immunology.

[5]  R. Ree.  The create project: EU support for the improvement of allergen standardization in Europe , 2004 .

[6]  R. Van Ree,et al.  How Accurate and Safe Is the Diagnosis of Hazelnut Allergy by Means of Commercial Skin Prick Test Reagents? , 2003, International Archives of Allergy and Immunology.

[7]  M. Barreto,et al.  Skin reactivity to histamine and to allergens in unselected 9‐year‐old children living in Poland and Italy , 2003, Pediatric allergy and immunology : official publication of the European Society of Pediatric Allergy and Immunology.

[8]  M. Barreto,et al.  Changes over 13 years in skin reactivity to histamine in cohorts of children aged 9–13 years , 2001, Allergy.

[9]  S. Holgate,et al.  Skin Prick Testing in Clinical Practice , 2000 .

[10]  R. Bush,et al.  Comparison of commercial peanut skin test extracts. , 1995, The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology.

[11]  A. Frew,et al.  Position Paper: Allergen standardization and skin tests , 1993 .

[12]  A Agresti,et al.  Modelling patterns of agreement and disagreement , 1992, Statistical methods in medical research.

[13]  H. Løwenstein,et al.  The collaborative study of the international standard of dog, Canis domesticus, hair/dander extract. , 1988, The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology.

[14]  D. Altman,et al.  STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT , 1986, The Lancet.

[15]  V. Seagroatt,et al.  A collaborative study on the first international standard of Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus (house dust mite) extract. , 1985, The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology.

[16]  C. Witt,et al.  Histamine sensitivity influences reactivity to allergens. , 1985, The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology.

[17]  D. Marsh,et al.  The international collaborative study establishing the first international standard for timothy (Phleum pratense) grass pollen allergenic extract. , 1985, The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology.

[18]  R. Helm,et al.  Production and testing of an international reference standard of short ragweed pollen extract. , 1984, The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology.

[19]  S. Burastero,et al.  Age, gender and reactivity to allergens independently influence skin reactivity to histamine. , 2006, Journal of investigational allergology & clinical immunology.

[20]  S. Parmiani,et al.  Variation of the skin end-point in patients treated with sublingual specific immunotherapy. , 2003, Journal of investigational allergology & clinical immunology.

[21]  S. Parmiani,et al.  Differential diagnosis by the endpoint method in patients skin-reactive to more than one inhalant allergen. , 2002, Journal of investigational allergology & clinical immunology.

[22]  S. Parmiani,et al.  Variation in skin reactivity inhalant allergens estimated by the end-point technique. , 2001, Journal of investigational allergology & clinical immunology.

[23]  D. Marsh,et al.  Allergen nomenclature. WHO/IUIS Allergen Nomenclature Subcommittee. , 1994, International archives of allergy and immunology.

[24]  Position paper: Allergen standardization and skin tests. The European Academy of Allergology and Clinical Immunology. , 1993, Allergy.

[25]  R. Strömberg,et al.  The international collaborative study on the first international standard of birch (Betula verrucosa)-pollen extract. , 1989, The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology.

[26]  H. Løwenstein,et al.  Standardization of Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus: assessment of potency and allergen content in ten coded extracts. , 1985, International archives of allergy and applied immunology.