Development and Validation of Dummies and Human Models Used in Crash Test

The crash test dummy, an important tool for car crash safety tests, is of great significance to explore the injury biomechanics of the occupants and improve the safety performance of the vehicle. The article mainly consists of four parts: brief introduction of injury mechanism, early experiments for obtaining biomechanical response (animal tests, cadaver tests, and volunteer tests), and development and validation of mechanical dummies and computational models. This study finds that the current crash test dummies are generally designed based on European and American, so they have limitations on the damage prediction of other regions. Further research in the crash test dummy needs the participation of various countries in order to develop a crash test dummy that meets the national conditions of each country. Simultaneously, it is necessary to develop dummies of vulnerable groups, such as the elderly dummy and obese people dummy.

[1]  L. M. Patrick,et al.  Dynamic Response of the Human Cadaver Head Compared to a Simple Mathematical Model , 1968 .

[2]  Alan M. Nahum,et al.  Impact tolerance and response of the human thorax II , 1971 .

[3]  M. Freeman Strength of Biological Materials , 1971 .

[4]  Harold J. Mertz,et al.  Performance Requirements and Characteristics of Mechanical Necks , 1973 .

[5]  R. F. Neathery,et al.  Analysis of chest impact response data and scaled performance recommendations , 1974 .

[6]  Robert P. Hubbard,et al.  Definition and development of a crash dummy head , 1974 .

[7]  L. M. Patrick,et al.  Cadaver and dummy knee impact response , 1976 .

[8]  A. Nahum,et al.  Intracranial Pressure Dynamics During Head Impact , 1977 .

[9]  M. J. Wolanin,et al.  HYBRID III - A BIOMECHANICALLY-BASED CRASH TEST DUMMY , 1977 .

[10]  A. Schultz,et al.  Mechanical Properties of Human Lumbar Spine Motion Segments—Part I: Responses in Flexion, Extension, Lateral Bending, and Torsion , 1979 .

[11]  Koshiro Ono,et al.  Human Head Tolerance to Sagittal Impact Reliable Estimation Deduced from Experimental Head Injury Using Subhuman Primates and Human Cadaver Skulls , 1980 .

[12]  David C. Viano,et al.  Interrelationship of Velocity and Chest Compression in Blunt Thoracic Impact to Swine , 1981 .

[13]  E. G. Janssen,et al.  Biofidelity of the European Side Impact Dummy – EUROSID , 1988 .

[14]  J W Melvin,et al.  Injury biomechanics research: an essential element in the prevention of trauma. , 1989, Journal of biomechanics.

[15]  Harold J. Mertz,et al.  Comparison of the EUROSID and SID Impact Responses to the Response Corridors of the International Standards Organization , 1989 .

[16]  Michael S. Beebe What is Biosid , 1990 .

[17]  Jean-Yves Foret-Bruno,et al.  Influence of the seat and head rest stiffness on the risk of cervical injuries in rear impact , 1993 .

[18]  Ellen Hertz,et al.  A note on the head injury criterion (HIC) as a predictor of the risk of skull fracture , 1993 .

[19]  Albert I. King,et al.  Finite element modeling of direct head impact , 1993 .

[20]  Koshiro Ono,et al.  Motion Analysis of Human Cervical Vertebrae During Low-Speed Rear Impacts by the Simulated Sled , 1999 .

[21]  S. Robin,et al.  FINITE ELEMENT MODEL OF THE HUMAN THORAX VALIDATED IN FRONTAL, OBLIQUE AND LATERAL IMPACTS: A TOOL TO EVALUATE NEW RESTRAINT SYSTEMS , 1998 .

[22]  Benoît Besnault,et al.  DEVELOPMENT OF A 3D FINITE ELEMENT MODEL OF THE HUMAN BODY , 1998 .

[23]  Jikuang Yang Bibliographic Study on Biomaterial Characterisation , 1998 .

[24]  Scott Tashman,et al.  Brain/skull relative displacement magnitude due to blunt head impact: new experimental data and model , 1999 .

[25]  Kazuo Miki,et al.  RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN LOCALIZED SPINE DEFORMATION AND CERVICAL VERTEBRAL MOTIONS FOR LOW SPEED REAR IMPACTS USING HUMAN VOLUNTEERS , 1999 .

[26]  P. Lövsund,et al.  Validation of the BioRID P3 Against Volunteer and PMHS Test Data and Comparison to the Hybrid III in Low-Velocity Rear-End Impacts , 1999 .

[27]  Erik G. Takhounts,et al.  DEVELOPMENT OF IMPROVED INJURY CRITERIA FOR THE ASSESSMENT OF ADVANCED AUTOMOTIVE RESTRAINT SYSTEMS - II , 1999 .

[28]  Masami Iwamoto,et al.  Development of a Finite Element Model of the Human Lower Extremity for Assessing Automotive Crash Injury Potential , 2000 .

[29]  Mats Y. Svensson,et al.  BIORID: A CRASH TEST DUMMY FOR REAR IMPACT: A REVIEW OF DEVELOPMENT, VALIDATION AND EVALUATION , 2000 .

[30]  A Kullgren,et al.  A Study of AIS1 Neck Injury Parameters in 168 Frontal Collisions Using a Restrained Hybrid III Dummy. , 2000, Stapp car crash journal.

[31]  K H Yang,et al.  Development of a finite element model of the human abdomen. , 2001, Stapp car crash journal.

[32]  L Zhang,et al.  Recent advances in brain injury research: a new human head model development and validation. , 2001, Stapp car crash journal.

[33]  S. Robin,et al.  HUMOS: HUMAN MODEL FOR SAFETY - A JOINT EFFORT TOWARDS THE DEVELOPMENT OF REFINED HUMAN-LIKE CAR OCCUPANT MODELS , 2001 .

[34]  K H Yang,et al.  Development of a computer model to predict aortic rupture due to impact loading. , 2001, Stapp car crash journal.

[35]  Katsuya Furusu,et al.  Fundamental study of side impact analysis using the finite element model of the human thorax , 2001 .

[36]  Masami Iwamoto,et al.  DEVELOPMENT OF A FINITE ELEMENT MODEL OF THE TOTAL HUMAN MODEL FOR SAFETY (THUMS) AND APPLICATION TO INJURY RECONSTRUCTION , 2002 .

[37]  Azim Eskandarian,et al.  Computer modeling and validation of a hybrid III dummy for crashworthiness simulation , 2002 .

[38]  Kazuo Miki,et al.  Development of a finite element model of the human body , 2002 .

[39]  Yuko Nakahira,et al.  Recent advances in THUMS : development of individual internal organs , brain , small female , and pedestrian model , 2003 .

[40]  Eddie Cooper,et al.  Head excursion of restrained human volunteers and hybrid III dummies in steady state rollover tests. , 2003, Annual proceedings. Association for the Advancement of Automotive Medicine.

[41]  L Thollon,et al.  Using a Finite Element Model to Evaluate Human Injuries Application to the HUMOS Model in Whiplash Situation , 2004, Spine.

[42]  Hyung Yun Choi,et al.  Human models for crash and impact simulation , 2004 .

[43]  Philippe Vezin,et al.  Development of a Set of Numerical Human Models for Safety , 2005 .

[44]  Keith Friedman,et al.  Finite Element Modeling of Rollover Crash Tests With Hybrid III Dummies , 2007 .

[45]  M. Nussbaum,et al.  Maximum voluntary joint torque as a function of joint angle and angular velocity: model development and application to the lower limb. , 2007, Journal of biomechanics.

[46]  Suzanne Tylko,et al.  WorldSID Production Dummy Biomechanical Responses , 2009 .

[47]  Arno Eichberger,et al.  A development process for creating finite-element models of crash test dummies based on investigations of the hardware , 2009 .

[48]  Xavier Trosseille,et al.  Evaluation of thoracic deflection as an injury criterion for side impact using a finite elements thorax model. , 2009, Stapp car crash journal.

[49]  Stephen W Rouhana,et al.  Development and validation of age-dependent FE human models of a mid-sized male thorax. , 2010, Stapp car crash journal.

[50]  Rajesh Malhotra,et al.  Predicting thoracic spinal postures in finite element model with Bezier technique , 2011 .

[51]  M. Panzer,et al.  Cervical Spine Model to Predict Capsular Ligament Response in Rear Impact , 2011, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[52]  F. S. Gayzik,et al.  Development of a Full Body CAD Dataset for Computational Modeling: A Multi-modality Approach , 2011, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[53]  Xavier Trosseille,et al.  Development of Injury Criteria for Frontal Impact Using a Human Body FE Model , 2011 .

[54]  Duane S Cronin,et al.  Cervical spine segment finite element model for traumatic injury prediction. , 2012, Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials.

[55]  Yuko Nakahira,et al.  Development of a human body finite element model with multiple muscles and their controller for estimating occupant motions and impact responses in frontal crash situations. , 2012, Stapp car crash journal.

[56]  Costin D. Untaroiu,et al.  A Finite Element Model of the Foot and Ankle for Automotive Impact Applications , 2012, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[57]  Joel D. Stitzel,et al.  Lateral Impact Validation of a Geometrically Accurate Full Body Finite Element Model for Blunt Injury Prediction , 2012, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[58]  Matthew P. Reed,et al.  Focusing on Vulnerable Populations in Crashes: Recent Advances in Finite Element Human Models for Injury Biomechanics Research , 2012 .

[59]  Joel D. Stitzel,et al.  Development of a full human body finite element model for blunt injury prediction utilizing a multi-modality medical imaging protocol , 2012 .

[60]  Philippe Beillas,et al.  PERFORMANCE OF A 50th PERCENTILE ABDOMINAL MODEL FOR IMPACT: EFFECTS OF SIZE AND MASS , 2012 .

[61]  Kristy B Arbogast,et al.  Occupant kinematics and shoulder belt retention in far-side lateral and oblique collisions: a parametric study. , 2013, Stapp car crash journal.

[62]  J. Crandall,et al.  Comparison of Kinematics of GHBMC to PMHS on the Side Impact Condition , 2013 .

[63]  Tsuyoshi Yasuki,et al.  Investigation of a Relationship Between External Force to Shoulder and Chest Injury of WorldSID and THUMS in 32 km/h Oblique Pole Side Impact , 2013, Traffic injury prevention.

[64]  J. Crandall,et al.  Side Impact PMHS Thoracic Response With Large-Volume Air Bag , 2014, Traffic injury prevention.

[65]  Bharath Koya,et al.  Development of the GHBMC 5th percentile female finite element model , 2015 .

[66]  J. Crandall,et al.  Validation of Shoulder Response of Human Body Finite-Element Model (GHBMC) Under Whole Body Lateral Impact Condition , 2016, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[67]  Jason R. Kerrigan,et al.  Comparison of Whole‐Body Kinematic Behaviour of the GHBMC Occupant Model to PMHS in Far‐Side Sled Tests , 2016 .

[68]  Anoop Chawla,et al.  Contour Based Repositioning of Specific Joints of the GHBMC Human Body FE Model , 2017 .

[69]  Rajesh Malhotra,et al.  Spline‐Based Repositioning for the Vertebral Column of the GHBMC Human Body Finite Element Model , 2017 .

[70]  B. COMPARISON OF HEAD-NECK KINEMATICS DURING REAR END IMPACT BETWEEN STANDARD HYBRID I I I , RIO NECK , VOLUNTEERS AND PMTO ' s , 2022 .