Assessment of the public administration tools for the improvement of the eco-efficiency of Small and Medium Sized Enterprises

Abstract Small and Medium Sized Enterprises (SME) face barriers to the implementation and development of eco-efficiency that could be overcome taking advantage of the adequate stimuli and incentives. A previous research and a thorough literature analysis show Public Administration (PA) is a key stakeholder. PA could use better its tools to stimulate SME to improve their ecoefficiency. Among these tools it can be named well known “command and control” tools like legislation or taxes, but also price policies, green procurement, ecological education, eco-innovation support and others. This paper reviews these tools and how they contribute to overcome barriers to ecoefficiency by offering external and internal incentives for SME. The analysis is focused on the case of Venezuelan public administration and SME but it can be generalized to other case studies. In addition, a panel of experts validates the results and assesses the public administration tools by means of the policy Delphi method. The assessment is based on criteria like: market influence, capability of the public administration for controlling results, tool costs, impact on public administration image, timespan to get results, etc. The assessment, therefore, allows ranking and understanding the tools according to their effectiveness and efficiency to support SME to improve their ecoefficiency. Due to the specific characteristics of the case study: SME of Venezuela, the method shows the best mix of public administration tools includes mainly “command and control” tools. Also the mix includes certain “new-approach” tools like advertising about responsible consumption and eco-efficient products, or education/training in environmental responsibility. The method also allows understanding better how the tools will help accomplishing the objectives for ecoefficiency of the public administration. Therefore, this research provides a method for raising information to be used when planning the actions to improve eco-efficiency of the SME.

[1]  D. Pinder,et al.  The ‘greening’ of tourism micro-businesses: outcomes of focus group investigations in South East Cornwall , 2003 .

[2]  R. V. D. Vorst,et al.  The role of support programmes and policies in improving SMEs environmental performance in developed and transition economies , 2004 .

[3]  Salvador F. Capuz-Rizo,et al.  Eco-efficiency in the SMEs of Venezuela. Current status and future perspectives , 2010 .

[4]  C. Garcés‐Ayerbe,et al.  Barriers to the adoption of proactive environmental strategies , 2011 .

[5]  R. Freeman.  Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach , 2010 .

[6]  Chi Ming Tam,et al.  How environmental management driving forces affect environmental and economic performance of SMEs: a study in the Northern China district , 2011 .

[7]  Hoevenagel Ruud,et al.  Promoting Environmental Technologies in SMEs: Barriers and Measures , 2007 .

[8]  Douglas C. MacMillan,et al.  The Delphi process – an expert‐based approach to ecological modelling in data‐poor environments , 2006 .

[9]  Rene van Berkel,et al.  Assessment of cleaner production uptake: method development and trial with small businesses in Western Australia , 2007 .

[10]  Don Fullerton,et al.  A Framework to Compare Environmental Policies , 2001 .

[11]  J. Brans,et al.  Geometrical representations for MCDA , 1988 .

[12]  Till Requate,et al.  Dynamic incentives by environmental policy instruments—a survey , 2005 .

[13]  C. Garcés‐Ayerbe,et al.  Why do patterns of environmental response differ? A stakeholders' pressure approach , 2008 .

[14]  Rob C. de Loë,et al.  Exploring complex policy questions using the policy Delphi: A multi-round, interactive survey method , 1995 .

[15]  Kathy K. Franklin,et al.  Idea Generation and Exploration: Benefits and Limitations of the Policy Delphi Research Method , 2006 .

[16]  J. Landeta.  Current validity of the Delphi method in social sciences , 2006 .

[17]  Tomás Gómez Navarro.  Propuesta metodológica para la mejora de la ecoeficiencia de los productos industriales a lo largo de su ciclo de vida. Aplicación a las pyme de la comunidad valenciana , 2004 .

[18]  Nicola Tollin,et al.  Stakeholder analysis for industrial waste management systems. , 2009, Waste management.

[19]  Tim Woolman,et al.  Designing Support for Manufacturing SMEs Approaching Ecodesign and Cleaner Production-Learning from UK Survey Results , 2006 .

[20]  Alicia Bárcena Ibarra,et al.  Política fiscal y medio ambiente: bases para una agenda común , 2005 .

[21]  A. Lovera.  Tecnología y ambiente: El desafío competitivo de la industria química y petroquímica venezolana , 2003 .

[22]  Philip J. Vergragt,et al.  Towards cleaner production: barriers and strategies in the base metals producing industry , 2005 .

[23]  Marek Makowski,et al.  Multiple criteria land use analysis , 1997 .

[24]  T. L. Saaty,et al.  Decision making with dependence and feedback , 2001 .

[25]  Kun-Mo Lee,et al.  Eco‐efficiency for Pollution Prevention in Small to Medium‐Sized Enterprises: A Case from South Korea , 2005 .

[26]  E Ciccozzi,et al.  Recent experiences and challenges in promoting cleaner production investments in developing countries , 2003 .

[27]  Byung-Wook Lee,et al.  Environmental Accounting Guidelines and Corporate Cases in Korea , 2005 .

[28]  R. Powell,et al.  Methodology Matters--V , 1996 .

[29]  T. Perneger.  International journal for quality in health care. , 1998, Nursing management.

[30]  Suzanne D. Pawlowski,et al.  The Delphi method as a research tool: an example, design considerations and applications , 2004, Inf. Manag..

[31]  M. Charter,et al.  Eco-design: The State of Implementation in Europe – Conclusions of a State of the Art Study for IPTS , 2001 .

[32]  Rene van Berkel,et al.  Cleaner production and eco-efficiency initiatives in Western Australia 1996–2004 , 2007 .

[33]  Jacqueline Cramer,et al.  Barriers and stimuli for ecodesign in SMEs , 2002 .