Eccentricity effects on lateral interactions

We attempted to resolve an apparent conflict between the lack of psychophysical evidence of collinear facilitation at the near-periphery and physiological evidence from the monkey showing collinear effects extra-fovealy. We compared collinear and orthogonal configurations to discount facilitation due to reduced positional uncertainty. Detection thresholds were measured for Gabor targets at eccentricities of 0 degrees - 4 degrees, flanked by collinear or orthogonal flankers. Like in previous reports in the literature, results varied among subjects when the stimulus position was off-fixation. We found reduced facilitation at eccentricities as small as 1 degrees - 2 degrees. Moreover, facilitation did not increase when the stimuli were M-scaled or when observers received more practice. However, a larger proportion of subjects showed collinear facilitation when attention was directed to the tested configurations. The results suggest that differences in allocation of attention along the visual field may affect the underlying lateral interactions, consequently resulting in eccentricity effects as well as inter-observer variability.

[1]  R F Hess,et al.  Relationship between facilitation at threshold and suprathreshold contour integration. , 1998, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[2]  Roman Bauer,et al.  Contour integration in striate cortex. Classic cell responses or cooperative selection? , 2002, Experimental brain research.

[3]  C. Koch,et al.  Flanker effects in peripheral contrast discrimination—psychophysics and modeling , 2001, Vision Research.

[4]  T. Wiesel,et al.  Columnar specificity of intrinsic horizontal and corticocortical connections in cat visual cortex , 1989, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[5]  S. Klein,et al.  Suppressive and facilitatory spatial interactions in peripheral vision: peripheral crowding is neither size invariant nor simple contrast masking. , 2002, Journal of vision.

[6]  Robert F Hess,et al.  Contour integration in the peripheral field , 1999, Vision Research.

[7]  B. S. Rubenstein,et al.  Spatial variability as a limiting factor in texture-discrimination tasks: implications for performance asymmetries. , 1990, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[8]  Mieke Donk,et al.  Detection Performance in Pop-Out Tasks: Nonmonotonic Changes with Display Size and Eccentricity , 2002, Perception.

[9]  E. Peli,et al.  Lateral interactions: size does matter , 2002, Vision Research.

[10]  U. Polat,et al.  Collinear stimuli regulate visual responses depending on cell's contrast threshold , 1998, Nature.

[11]  D. Sagi,et al.  Isolating Excitatory and Inhibitory Nonlinear Spatial Interactions Involved in Contrast Detection * * Part of this paper was presented at the 17th ECVP conference, Eindhoven, The Netherlands (September 1994). , 1996, Vision Research.

[12]  S. Sherman,et al.  Receptive-field characteristics of neurons in cat striate cortex: Changes with visual field eccentricity. , 1976, Journal of neurophysiology.

[13]  Victor A. F. Lamme,et al.  Contextual Modulation in Primary Visual Cortex , 1996, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[14]  U Polat,et al.  Spatial interactions in human vision: from near to far via experience-dependent cascades of connections. , 1994, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[15]  U. Polat,et al.  The architecture of perceptual spatial interactions , 1994, Vision Research.

[16]  Steven C. Dakin,et al.  Absence of contour linking in peripheral vision , 1997, Nature.

[17]  D. Sagi,et al.  Contrast integration across space , 1999, Vision Research.

[18]  D. Sagi,et al.  Effects of spatial configuration on contrast detection , 1998, Vision Research.

[19]  T. Wiesel,et al.  Relationships between horizontal interactions and functional architecture in cat striate cortex as revealed by cross-correlation analysis , 1986, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[20]  R. Frostig,et al.  Cortical point-spread function and long-range lateral interactions revealed by real-time optical imaging of macaque monkey primary visual cortex , 1994, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[21]  Marisa Carrasco,et al.  Attention improves or impairs visual performance by enhancing spatial resolution , 1998, Nature.

[22]  D. Sagi.  Detection of an orientation singularity in gabor textures: Effect of signal density and spatial-frequency , 1990, Vision Research.

[23]  Vision Research , 1961, Nature.

[24]  M. J. Morgan,et al.  Contrast detection facilitation by spatially separated targets and inducers , 1995, Vision Research.

[25]  R. L. Valois,et al.  The orientation and direction selectivity of cells in macaque visual cortex , 1982, Vision Research.

[26]  P. Cavanagh,et al.  The Spatial Resolution of Visual Attention , 2001, Cognitive Psychology.

[27]  E. Peli,et al.  Contour integration in peripheral vision reduces gradually with eccentricity , 2003, Vision Research.

[28]  Rick Gurnsey,et al.  Orientation discrimination in foveal and extra-foveal vision: effects of stimulus bandwidth and contrast , 2003, Vision Research.

[29]  J. M. Foley,et al.  Contrast masking in human vision. , 1980, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[30]  Eli Peli,et al.  Facilitation of contrast detection in near-peripheral vision , 2004, Vision Research.

[31]  U. Polat,et al.  Lateral interactions between spatial channels: Suppression and facilitation revealed by lateral masking experiments , 1993, Vision Research.

[32]  A. Grinvald,et al.  Relationship between intrinsic connections and functional architecture revealed by optical imaging and in vivo targeted biocytin injections in primate striate cortex. , 1993, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[33]  D G Pelli,et al.  Uncertainty explains many aspects of visual contrast detection and discrimination. , 1985, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[34]  A. Watson,et al.  Transducer model produces facilitation from opposite-sign flanks , 1999, Vision Research.

[35]  U. Polat,et al.  Neurophysiological Evidence for Contrast Dependent Long-range Facilitation and Suppression in the Human Visual Cortex , 1996, Vision Research.

[36]  D. Sagi,et al.  Configuration saliency revealed in short duration binocular rivalry , 1999, Vision Research.

[37]  C Wehrhahn,et al.  Contextual influence on orientation discrimination of humans and responses of neurons in V1 of alert monkeys. , 2000, Journal of neurophysiology.

[38]  Jon Driver,et al.  Lateral interactions between targets and flankers in low-level vision depend on attention to the flankers , 2001, Nature Neuroscience.

[39]  Christian Wehrhahn,et al.  Neuronal responses from beyond the classic receptive field in V1 of alert monkeys , 2001, Experimental Brain Research.

[40]  S. Klein,et al.  Facilitation of contrast detection by cross-oriented surround stimuli and its psychophysical mechanisms. , 2002, Journal of vision.

[41]  J. B. Levitt,et al.  Contrast dependence of contextual effects in primate visual cortex , 1997, nature.

[42]  D. Sagi,et al.  Mechanisms for spatial integration in visual detection: a model based on lateral interactions. , 1999, Spatial vision.

[43]  J. Lund,et al.  Compulsory averaging of crowded orientation signals in human vision , 2001, Nature Neuroscience.

[44]  C. Gilbert,et al.  Improvement in visual sensitivity by changes in local context: Parallel studies in human observers and in V1 of alert monkeys , 1995, Neuron.

[45]  P. Schiller,et al.  Quantitative studies of single-cell properties in monkey striate cortex. II. Orientation specificity and ocular dominance. , 1976, Journal of neurophysiology.

[46]  D. V. van Essen,et al.  Neuronal responses to static texture patterns in area V1 of the alert macaque monkey. , 1992, Journal of neurophysiology.

[47]  P. Cavanagh,et al.  Attentional resolution and the locus of visual awareness , 1996, Nature.

[48]  D. Heeger,et al.  Center-surround interactions in foveal and peripheral vision , 2000, Vision Research.

[49]  J. Rovamo,et al.  An estimation and application of the human cortical magnification factor , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[50]  Enhanced sensitivity for peripherally‐presented collinearly‐aligned stimulus elements: contour detection or spatial summation? , 2001, Clinical & experimental optometry.