Action formation and its epistemic (and other) backgrounds

This article reviews arguments that, in the process of action formation and ascription, the relative status of the participants with respect to a projected action can adjust or trump the action stance conveyed by the linguistic form of the utterance. In general, congruency between status and stance is preferred, and linguistic form is a fairly reliable guide to action ascription. However incongruities between stance and status result in action ascriptions that are at variance with the action stance that is otherwise conveyed in the turn. This argument is presented, first, in relation to epistemic status and stance where the process is argued to be both fundamental and universal across all declarative and interrogative utterances. Some consequences of this way of viewing action are discussed. The argument is then briefly extended to deontics and benefactives.

[1]  J. Sadock,et al.  Toward a Linguistic Theory of Speech Acts , 1975 .

[2]  Geoffrey Raymond.  Grammar and Social Organization: Yes/No Interrogatives and the Structure of Responding , 2003, American Sociological Review.

[3]  M. Tomasello.  Origins of human communication , 2008 .

[4]  John Heritage,et al.  Epistemics in Action: Action Formation and Territories of Knowledge , 2012 .

[5]  Stephen C. Levinson.  Interrogative intimations: On a possible social economics of interrogatives , 2012 .

[6]  T. Stivers,et al.  Knowledge, morality and affiliation in social interaction , 2011 .

[7]  R. Rooij,et al.  On Polar Questions , 2003 .

[8]  A. Avramides.  Studies in the Way of Words , 1992 .

[9]  M. Pollner.  'The Very Coinage of Your Brain': The Anatomy of Reality Disjunctures , 1975 .

[10]  Sarah Brown-Schmidt,et al.  Addressees distinguish shared from private information when interpreting questions during interactive conversation , 2008, Cognition.

[11]  N. J. Enfield,et al.  Social Consequences of Common Ground , 2006 .

[12]  D. Sperber,et al.  Epistemic Vigilance , 2010 .

[13]  T. Stivers,et al.  An overview of the question-response system in American English conversation , 2010 .

[14]  付伶俐.  打磨Using Language,倡导新理念 , 2014 .

[15]  Gene H. Lerner.  Conversation analysis. Studies from the first generation. , 2004 .

[16]  Ronald Geluykens,et al.  On the myth of rising intonation in polar questions , 1988 .

[17]  Emanuel A. Schegloff,et al.  Confirming Allusions: Toward an Empirical Account of Action , 1996, American Journal of Sociology.

[18]  A. Lindström.  Motherhood, medicine, and morality: Scenes from a medical encounter , 1998 .

[19]  Tanya Stivers,et al.  Research on Language & Social Interaction , 2011 .

[20]  S. Levinson.  Action formation and ascription , 2013 .

[21]  S. Clayman.  Talk in Action: Interactions, Identities, and Institutions , 2010 .

[22]  Alene Kiku Terasaki.  Pre-announcement sequences in conversation , 2004 .

[23]  M. Pollner.  Mundane Reasoning , 1974 .

[24]  S. Levinson.  Presumptive Meanings: The theory of generalized conversational implicature , 2001 .

[25]  Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen.  Some truths and untruths about final intonation in conversational questions , 2012 .

[26]  A. Koller,et al.  Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language , 1969 .

[27]  E. Schegloff.  Structures of Social Action: On some questions and ambiguities in conversation , 1985 .

[28]  D. Bolinger,et al.  Interrogative Structures of American English , 1959 .

[29]  Matylda Weidner.  On the organization of Polish doctor-patient communication : practices for building questions, negotiating knowledge, and recommending treatment , 2012 .

[30]  H. Garfinkel.  Studies in Ethnomethodology , 1968 .

[31]  W. Wiegand.  : The System of Professions: An Essay on the Division of Expert Labor , 1990 .

[32]  J. Atkinson,et al.  A change-of-state token and aspects of its sequential placement , 1985 .

[33]  T. Stivers,et al.  Territories of knowledge, territories of experience: empathic moments in interaction , 2011 .

[34]  Susan L. Ehrlich,et al.  "Why do you ask?" : the function of questions in institutional discourse , 2010 .

[35]  Geoffrey Raymond.  The epistemics of social relations: Owning grandchildren , 2006, Language in Society.

[36]  F. Platt,et al.  Bad News, Good News: Conversational Order in Everyday Talk and Clinical Settings , 2003 .

[37]  Anita M. Pomerantz,et al.  Telling My Side: “Limited Access’ as a “Fishing” Device , 1980 .

[38]  E. Schegloff.  Discourse as an interactional achievement : Some uses of "Uh huh" and other things that come between sentences , 1982 .

[39]  Jonathan Clifton,et al.  Beyond Rhetorical Questions: Assertive Questions in Everyday Interaction by Irene Koshik , 2007 .

[40]  Gerd Gigerenzer,et al.  Fast and frugal heuristics: The tools of bounded rationality , 2004 .

[41]  Harold Garfinkel,et al.  On Formal Structures of Practical Actions , 2005 .

[42]  S. Levinson.  Interactional biases in human thinking , 1995 .

[43]  Johanna Nichols,et al.  Evidentiality: The Linguistic Coding of Epistemology , 1986 .

[44]  D. Zimmerman,et al.  Rights and Responsibilities in Calls for Help: The Case of the Mountain Glade Fire , 2007 .

[45]  Stephen C. Levinson,et al.  Minimization and conversational inference , 1987 .

[46]  A. Peräkylä,et al.  Deontic Authority in Interaction: The Right to Announce, Propose, and Decide , 2012 .

[47]  Judy Davidson.  Structures of Social Action: Subsequent versions of invitations, offers, requests, and proposals dealing with potential or actual rejection , 1985 .

[48]  Gene H. Lerner.  Selecting next speaker: The context-sensitive operation of a context-free organization , 2003, Language in Society.

[49]  神尾 昭雄.  Territory of information , 1997 .

[50]  Melisa Stevanovic.  Managing participation in interaction: the case of humming , 2013 .

[51]  Marilyn R. Whalen,et al.  When Words Fail: A Single Case Analysis , 1988 .

[52]  R. Hopper.  Talk and Social Structure , 1980 .

[53]  Melisa Stevanovic.  Prosodic salience and the emergence of new decisions: On approving responses to proposals in Finnish workplace interaction , 2012 .

[54]  E. Schegloff,et al.  Opening up Closings , 1973 .

[55]  Kensy Cooperrider.  Roots of human sociality: culture, cognition and interaction , 2009 .

[56]  T. Stivers,et al.  Person reference in interaction: Linguistic, cultural, and social perspectives , 2007 .

[57]  K. Hengeveld.  Mood and modality , 2004 .

[58]  C. Goodwin.  The Interactive Construction of a Sentence in Natural Conversation , 1979 .

[59]  Tanya Stivers,et al.  Mobilizing Response , 2010 .

[60]  Herbert S. Gross,et al.  Therapeutic Discourse: Psychotherapy as Conversation , 1978 .

[61]  Emanuel A. Schegloff,et al.  Presequences and indirection: Applying speech act theory to ordinary conversation , 1988 .

[62]  P. Drew,et al.  Contingency and Action: A Comparison of Two Forms of Requesting , 2008 .

[63]  Jan Svartvik,et al.  A __ comprehensive grammar of the English language , 1988 .

[64]  Trine Heinemann,et al.  Will you or can't you? Displaying entitlement in interrogative requests , 2006 .

[65]  Kaoru Hayano.  Claiming epistemic primacy: Yo-marked assessments in Japanese , 2011 .

[66]  Federico Rossano,et al.  Questioning and responding in Italian , 2010 .

[67]  Makoto Ha,et al.  Transformative answers: One way to resist a question’s constraints , 2010, Language in Society.

[68]  J. Sinclair,et al.  Towards an analysis of discourse , 1977 .

[69]  Stephen C. Levinson,et al.  On the human ‘interactional engine’ , 2006 .

[70]  E. Schegloff,et al.  A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation , 1974 .

[71]  Melvin Pollner,et al.  Mundane Reason: Reality in Everyday and Sociological Discourse , 1988 .

[72]  G. Jefferson.  Preliminary notes on a possible metric which provides for a 'standard maximum' silence of approximately one second in conversation. , 1989 .

[73]  Jules Townshend,et al.  Power, A Radical View , 2007 .

[74]  Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel,et al.  Elements of the Philosophy of Right , 1820 .

[75]  Susan Ervin-Tripp.  How to make and understand a request , 1981 .

[76]  Eleanor Rosch,et al.  Principles of Categorization , 1978 .

[77]  T. Stivers,et al.  Modified Repeats: One Method for Asserting Primary Rights From Second Position , 2005 .

[78]  M. Sorjonen.  Constituting and maintaining activities across sequences: And-prefacing as a feature of question design , 1994, Language in Society.

[79]  Melisa Stevanovic.  Establishing joint decisions in a dyad , 2012 .

[80]  Irene Koshik,et al.  A conversation analytic study of yes/no questions which convey reversed polarity assertions , 2002 .

[81]  Stephen C. Levinson,et al.  The essential inadequacies of speech act models of dialogue , 1981 .