The use of finite element analysis to model bone-implant contact with basal implants.

OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study was to develop a model that accurately represents the interface between bone and basal implants throughout the healing process. STUDY DESIGN The model was applied to the biological scenario of changing load distribution in a basal implant system over time. We did this through finite element analysis (FEA, or finite element method [FEM]), using multiple models with changing bone-implant contact definitions, which reflected the dynamic nature of the interface throughout the bony healing process. RESULTS In the simple models, peak von Mises stresses decreased as the bone-implant-contact definition was changed from extremely soft contact (i.e., immature bone during early loading) to hard contact (i.e., mature bone). In upgraded models, which more closely approximate the biological scenario with basal dental implant, peak von Mises stresses decreased at the implant interface; however, they increased at the bone interface as a harder contact definition was modeled. Further, we found a shift in peak stress location within the implants during different contact definitions (i.e., different stages of bony healing). In the case of hard contact, the peak stress occurs above the contact surface, whereas in soft contact, the stress peak occurs in the upper part of the contact area between bone and the vertical shaft of the implant. Only in the extreme soft contact definitions were the peak stresses found near the base plate of the implant. CONCLUSION Future FEM studies evaluating the functional role of dental implants should consider a similar model that takes into account bone tissue adaptations over time.

[1]  R. Mericske-Stern,et al.  Simultaneous force measurements in 3 dimensions on oral endosseous implants in vitro and in vivo. A methodological study. , 1996, Clinical oral implants research.

[2]  W. Murphy,et al.  AO principles of fracture management , 2018, Acta chirurgica Belgica.

[3]  S. Ihde Principles of BOI , 2005 .

[4]  P. J. Atkinson,et al.  Cortical structure of the pig mandible after the insertion of metallic implants into alveolar bone. , 1977, Archives of oral biology.

[5]  D H DeTolla,et al.  Role of the finite element model in dental implants. , 2000, The Journal of oral implantology.

[6]  G. Liu,et al.  Application of finite element analysis in implant dentistry: a review of the literature. , 2001, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[7]  P. Dechow,et al.  Variations in cortical material properties throughout the human dentate mandible. , 2003, American journal of physical anthropology.

[8]  F van Keulen,et al.  Numerical simulation of tissue differentiation around loaded titanium implants in a bone chamber. , 2004, Journal of biomechanics.

[9]  I Naert,et al.  Assessment of Mechanobiological Models for the Numerical Simulation of Tissue Differentiation around Immediately Loaded Implants , 2003, Computer methods in biomechanics and biomedical engineering.

[10]  Amit Gefen,et al.  A method of quantification of stress shielding in the proximal femur using hierarchical computational modeling , 2006, Computer methods in biomechanics and biomedical engineering.

[11]  R. Brand,et al.  How do tissues respond and adapt to stresses around a prosthesis? A primer on finite element stress analysis for orthopaedic surgeons. , 2003, The Iowa orthopaedic journal.