Probabilistic risk assessment from potential exposures to the public applied for innovative nuclear installations

Potential exposures are those that may occur as a result of unanticipated operational performance or accidents. Potential exposure situations are probabilistic in nature because they depend on uncertain events such as equipment failure, operator errors or external initiators beyond the control of the operator. Consequently, there may exist a range of possible radiological impacts that need to be considered. In this paper a Level 3 Probabilistic Safety Assessment (PSA) for a hypothetical scenario relevant to Innovative Nuclear Energy Systems (INS) was conducted using computer code MACCS (MELCOR Accident Consequence Code Systems). The acceptability of an INS was analyzed taking into account the general requirement that relocation or evacuation measures must not be necessary beyond the site boundary. In addition, deterministic modeling of the accident consequences for the critical meteorological conditions was carried out using the JRODOS decision support system (Real-time On-line Decision Support system for off-site emergency management in Europe). The approach used for dose and risk assessment from potential exposure of accidental releases and their comparison with acceptance criteria are presented. The methodology described can be used as input to the licensing procedure and engineering design considerations to help satisfy relevant health and environmental impact criteria for fission or fusion nuclear installations.

[1]  Wolfgang Raskob,et al.  The Decision Support System RODOS , 2014 .

[2]  Alla Dvorzhak,et al.  Spanish experience on modeling of environmental radioactive contamination due to Fukushima Daiichi NPP accident using JRODOS. , 2012, Environmental science & technology.

[3]  Alla Dvorzhak,et al.  Assessment of Dose and Risk for Public from Potential Exposure Using WinMACCS and JRODOS Codes , 2015 .

[4]  Edward L. Wilds,et al.  Radiation Protection and Safety of Radiation Sources: International Basic Safety Standards—Interim Edition, General Safety Requirements Part 3 No. GSR Part 3 (Interim) , 2013 .

[5]  Jan-Erik Holmberg,et al.  Probabilistic safety goals for nuclear power plants , 2009 .

[6]  Mietek Lisak,et al.  A conceptual study of commercial fusion power plants, EFDA-RP-RE-5.0 , 2005 .

[7]  Abel J. González,et al.  The Argentine Approach to Radiation Safety: Its Ethical Basis , 2011 .

[8]  Wolfgang Raskob,et al.  JRODOS: Platform for improved long term countermeasures modelling and management , 2011 .

[9]  R. Sievert,et al.  Book Reviews : Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection (as amended 1959 and revised 1962). I.C.R.P. Publication 6. 70 pp. PERGAMON PRESS. Oxford, London and New York, 1964. £1 5s. 0d. [TB/54] , 1964 .

[10]  Marco Enrico Ricotti,et al.  Revising the Emergency Management Requirements for new generation reactors , 2014 .

[11]  Wolfgang Raskob,et al.  Updated Accident Consequence Analyses for ITER at Cadarache , 2007 .