Comparison of Short-Term Clinical Results and Radiologic Changes Between Two Different Minimally Invasive Decompressive Surgical Methods for Lumbar Canal Stenosis

There were no significant differences in clinical outcomes and radiological changes except for disc height between the lumbar spinous process-splitting laminectomy and trans-interspinous lumbar decompression (TISLD) groups at short-term follow-up. Removal of interspinous contextures in TISLD might be more likely to cause disc height loss when applied at the L4/5 level. Study Design. A multicenter, retrospective study. Objective. To clarify the clinical and radiological effects of removing interspinous contextures in lumbar decompression surgery for patients with lumbar spinal stenosis. Summary of Background Data. There have seldom been reports that have compared both clinical results and radiological changes among minimally invasive decompression methods. Methods. Consecutive 52 patients underwent lumbar spinous process-splitting laminectomy (LSPSL), following which 50 patients underwent trans-interspinous lumbar decompression (TISLD). All patients presented with cauda equina type of lumbar spinal stenosis and underwent a minimum 1-year follow-up. The Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score and Japanese Orthopaedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire (JOABPEQ) score were evaluated to determine the extent of daily living activities. Propensity score (PS)-matched analysis was used to match patients’ age and preoperative JOA scores between the two groups. Lumbar lordosis (LL), disc height (DH), segmental range of motion (ROM), and vertebral anterior translation were measured by functional lumbar lateral x-ray, and changes between preoperative and 1-year postoperative values were evaluated. Results. Twenty-nine pairs of patients were selected by PS-matching. Mean JOA scores increased from 14.4 to 23.5 (mean recovery rate was 62.3%) in the LSPSL group and from 14.0 to 23.2 (61.3%) in the TISLD group at preoperative and 1-year follow-up, respectively. There were no significant differences in clinical results and changes in LL, ROM, and vertebral anterior translation in each group. The DH at L4/5 level at 1-year after surgery revealed significant decrease in the TISLD group compared with the LSPSL group. There was a correlation between preoperative DH and DH decrease in the LSPSL group, but not in TISLD group. Conclusion. Removal of interspinous contextures did not influence clinical outcomes at 1 year after surgery, but it may be likely to cause disc height loss when it applied at the L4/5 level. Level of Evidence: 3

[1]  Akimasa Yasuda,et al.  Minimally clinically important differences for the Japanese Orthopaedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire (JOABPEQ) following decompression surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis , 2019, Journal of Clinical Neuroscience.

[2]  M. Soliman,et al.  Decompression of lumbar canal stenosis with a bilateral interlaminar versus classic laminectomy technique: a prospective randomized study. , 2019, Neurosurgical focus.

[3]  T. Kubo,et al.  Clinical Outcome of Muscle-Preserving Interlaminar Decompression (MILD) for Lumbar Spinal Canal Stenosis: Minimum 5-Year Follow-Up Study , 2018, Spine surgery and related research.

[4]  T. Oda,et al.  Responsiveness of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire in lumbar surgery and its threshold for indicating clinically important differences. , 2019, The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society.

[5]  Juan S. Uribe,et al.  Morphometric Analysis of Lumbar Intervertebral Disc Height: An Imaging Study. , 2018, World neurosurgery.

[6]  T. Witham,et al.  Iatrogenic Spondylolisthesis Following Open Lumbar Laminectomy: Case Series and Review of the Literature. , 2018, World neurosurgery.

[7]  Sakae Tanaka,et al.  Prognostic factors associated with the surgical indication for lumbar spinal stenosis patients less responsive to conservative treatments: An investigator-initiated observational cohort study. , 2017, Journal of orthopaedic science : official journal of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association.

[8]  Y. Mukai,et al.  Preoperative retrolisthesis as a predictive risk factor of reoperation due to delayed-onset symptomatic foraminal stenosis after central decompression for lumbar canal stenosis without fusion. , 2017, The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society.

[9]  S. Takenaka,et al.  Preoperative retrolisthesis as a risk factor of postdecompression lumbar disc herniation. , 2016, Journal of neurosurgery. Spine.

[10]  R. Gunzburg,et al.  Effectiveness of posterior decompression techniques compared with conventional laminectomy for lumbar stenosis , 2015, European Spine Journal.

[11]  S. Kurtz,et al.  Statistics in Brief: An Introduction to the Use of Propensity Scores , 2015, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[12]  H. Hashidate,et al.  Comparison of Spinous Process-Splitting Laminectomy versus Conventional Laminectomy for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis , 2014, Asian spine journal.

[13]  R. Mobbs,et al.  Outcomes after decompressive laminectomy for lumbar spinal stenosis: comparison between minimally invasive unilateral laminectomy for bilateral decompression and open laminectomy: clinical article. , 2014, Journal of neurosurgery. Spine.

[14]  Katherine A. Kosman,et al.  Precision of Lumbar Intervertebral Measurements: Does a Computer-Assisted Technique Improve Reliability? , 2011, Spine.

[15]  J. Weinstein,et al.  Predominant Leg Pain Is Associated With Better Surgical Outcomes in Degenerative Spondylolisthesis and Spinal Stenosis: Results From the Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial (SPORT) , 2011, Spine.

[16]  Y. Toyama,et al.  Reduced postoperative wound pain after lumbar spinous process-splitting laminectomy for lumbar canal stenosis: a randomized controlled study. , 2011, Journal of neurosurgery. Spine.

[17]  A. Guermazi,et al.  Spinal stenosis prevalence and association with symptoms: the Framingham Study. , 2009, The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society.

[18]  T. Wei,et al.  Disc Height and Lumbar Index as Independent Predictors of Degenerative Spondylolisthesis in Middle-Aged Women With Low Back Pain , 2009, Spine.

[19]  T. Kubo,et al.  Muscle-Preserving Interlaminar Decompression for the Lumbar Spine: A Minimally Invasive New Procedure for Lumbar Spinal Canal Stenosis , 2009, Spine.

[20]  H. Miyamoto,et al.  Clinical Outcome of Nonoperative Treatment for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis, and Predictive Factors Relating to Prognosis, in a 5-Year Minimum Follow-up , 2008, Journal of spinal disorders & techniques.

[21]  E. Blood,et al.  THE IMPACT OF WORKERS??? COMPENSATION ON OUTCOMES OF PATIENTS WITH A LUMBAR DISC HERNIATION: TWO-YEAR RESULTS FROM THE SPINE PATIENT OUTCOMES RESEARCH TRIAL (SPORT) , 2008 .

[22]  K. Yonenobu,et al.  Japanese Orthopaedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire. Part 3. Validity study and establishment of the measurement scale , 2008, Journal of orthopaedic science : official journal of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association.

[23]  K. Yonenobu,et al.  Japanese Orthopaedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire. Part 2. Verification of its reliability , 2007, Journal of orthopaedic science : official journal of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association.

[24]  S. Konno,et al.  A diagnostic support tool for lumbar spinal stenosis: a self-administered, self-reported history questionnaire , 2007, BMC musculoskeletal disorders.

[25]  K. Yonenobu,et al.  JOA Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire: initial report , 2007, Journal of orthopaedic science : official journal of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association.

[26]  Y. Toyama,et al.  Lumbar spinous process-splitting laminectomy for lumbar canal stenosis. Technical note. , 2005, Journal of neurosurgery. Spine.

[27]  J. Zucherman,et al.  A prospective randomized multi-center study for the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis with the X STOP interspinous implant: 1-year results , 2003, European Spine Journal.

[28]  S. Kubo,et al.  Clinical results of posterolateral fusion for degenerative lumbar spinal diseases: a follow-up study of more than 10 years , 2002, Journal of orthopaedic science : official journal of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association.

[29]  K. Ijiri,et al.  Nonsurgically managed patients with degenerative spondylolisthesis: a 10- to 18-year follow-up study. , 2000, Journal of neurosurgery.

[30]  J. A. Alvarez,et al.  Lumbar spine stenosis: a common cause of back and leg pain. , 1998, American family physician.

[31]  J. Partanen,et al.  Local Denervation Atrophy of Paraspinal Muscles in Postoperative Failed Back Syndrome , 1993, Spine.

[32]  W. Lane CASE OF SPONDYLOLISTHESIS ASSOCIATED WITH PROGRESSIVE PARAPLEGIA; LAMINECTOMY. , 1893 .