Colocation Data Center Demand Response Using Nash Bargaining Theory

The huge yet flexible power consumption of data centers makes them promising resources for demand response, particularly for emergency demand response (EDR) which requires a certain amount of load curtailment during emergencies. However, current data centers often participate in EDR by starting up their backup diesel generators, resulting in both high costs and large carbon emissions. In this paper, we focus on cost-effective and eco-friendly demand response in colocation data centers by designing economic incentives for tenants to reduce their loads during emergency periods for EDR. In particular, we model and analyze the interaction among the data center operator and tenants by using Nash bargaining theory, and derive the optimal solutions for the load reduction and reimbursement for each tenant under two different bargaining protocols (i.e., sequential bargaining and concurrent bargaining). We prove that the derived solutions are Pareto-efficient and fair, and therefore self-enforcing and satisfactory for all entities. Numerical results based on trace-driven simulations show that the proposed bargaining approach is beneficial to both the data center operator and tenants, while also reducing the carbon emissions to the environment from data center demand response.

[1]  J. Nash Two-Person Cooperative Games , 1953 .

[2]  Shaolei Ren,et al.  A truthful incentive mechanism for emergency demand response in colocation data centers , 2015, 2015 IEEE Conference on Computer Communications (INFOCOM).

[3]  Miao Pan,et al.  Coordinated energy management for colocation data centers in smart grids , 2015, 2015 IEEE International Conference on Smart Grid Communications (SmartGridComm).

[4]  Shaolei Ren,et al.  Paying to save: Reducing cost of colocation data center via rewards , 2015, 2015 IEEE 21st International Symposium on High Performance Computer Architecture (HPCA).

[5]  Shaolei Ren,et al.  GreenColo: A novel incentive mechanism for minimizing carbon footprint in colocation data center , 2014, International Green Computing Conference.

[6]  Bruce M. Maggs,et al.  Cutting the electric bill for internet-scale systems , 2009, SIGCOMM '09.

[7]  Adam Wierman,et al.  Renewable and cooling aware workload management for sustainable data centers , 2012, SIGMETRICS '12.

[8]  Devin G. Pope,et al.  Bid Takers or Market Makers? The Effect of Auctioneers on Auction Outcomes , 2013 .

[9]  Zhu Han,et al.  Demand Response of Data Centers: A Real-time Pricing Game Between Utilities in Smart Grid , 2014, Feedback Computing.

[10]  Xiaorui Wang,et al.  Server-Level Power Control , 2007, Fourth International Conference on Autonomic Computing (ICAC'07).

[11]  Deshi Ye,et al.  A Truthful FPTAS Mechanism for Emergency Demand Response in Colocation Data Centers , 2015, IEEE INFOCOM 2019 - IEEE Conference on Computer Communications.

[12]  Richard E. Brown,et al.  Report to Congress on Server and Data Center Energy Efficiency: Public Law 109-431 , 2008 .

[13]  Lachlan L. H. Andrew,et al.  Greening geographical load balancing , 2011, PERV.

[14]  Yuguang Fang,et al.  Electricity Cost Saving Strategy in Data Centers by Using Energy Storage , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems.

[15]  Adam Wierman,et al.  Greening Multi-Tenant Data Center Demand Response , 2015, PERV.

[16]  Shaolei Ren,et al.  Colocation Demand Response: Why Do I Turn Off My Servers? , 2014, ICAC.

[17]  J. Nash THE BARGAINING PROBLEM , 1950, Classics in Game Theory.

[18]  Yuguang Fang,et al.  Energy and Network Aware Workload Management for Sustainable Data Centers with Thermal Storage , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems.

[19]  Adam Wierman,et al.  Opportunities and challenges for data center demand response , 2014, International Green Computing Conference.

[20]  Randolph D. Nelson,et al.  Probability, stochastic processes, and queueing theory - the mathematics of computer performance modeling , 1995 .