Automated Method for Computing the Morphological and Clinical Parameters of the Proximal Femur Using Heuristic Modeling Techniques

Bone morphology and morphometric measurements of the lower limb provide significant and useful information for computer-assisted orthopedic surgery planning and intervention, surgical follow-up evaluation, and personalized prosthesis design. Femoral head radius and center, neck axis and size, femoral offset and shaft axis are morphological and functional parameters of the proximal femur utilized both in diagnosis and therapy. Obtaining this information from image data without any operator supervision or manual editing remains a practical objective to avoid variability intrinsic in the manual analysis. In this article, we propose a heuristic method that automatically computes the proximal femur morphological parameters by processing the mesh surface of the femur. The surface data are sequentially processed using geometrical properties such as symmetries, asymmetries, and principal elongation directions. Numerical methods identify the axis of the shaft of femur (least squares cylinder fitting), the head surface and center (least squares sphere fitting), and the femur neck axis and radius (minimal area of the cross section by evolutionary optimization). The repeatability of the method was tested upon 20 femur (10 left + 10 right) surfaces reconstructed from CT scans taken on cadavers. The repeatability error of the automated computation of anatomical landmarks, angles, sizes, and axes was less than 1.5 mm, 2.5°, 1.0 mm, and 3.5 mm, respectively. The computed parameters were in good agreement (landmark difference: <2.0 mm; angle difference: <2.0°; axes difference: <2.5°; size difference: <1.5 mm) with the corresponding reference parameters manually identified in the original CT images by medical experts. In conclusion, the proposed method can improve the degree of automation of model-based hip replacement surgical systems.

[1]  Eun Kyoo Song,et al.  3D femoral neck anteversion measurements based on the posterior femoral plane in ORTHODOC® system , 2006, Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing.

[2]  P. Noble,et al.  A comparison of alternative methods of measuring femoral anteversion. , 1998, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[3]  Guoyan Zheng,et al.  3D reconstruction of a patient-specific surface model of the proximal femur from calibrated x-ray radiographs: a validation study. , 2009, Medical physics.

[4]  D. Kohn,et al.  Femoral anatomy, computed tomography and computer-aided design of prosthetic implants , 2002, Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery.

[5]  F M Rodriguez y Baena,et al.  Preoperative planning and intraoperative guidance for accurate computer-assisted minimally invasive hip resurfacing surgery , 2006, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine.

[6]  S. I. Kim,et al.  Measurement of femoral neck anteversion in 3D. Part 1: 3D imaging method , 2000, Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing.

[7]  Max Mignotte,et al.  A hierarchical statistical modeling approach for the unsupervised 3-D biplanar reconstruction of the scoliotic spine , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[8]  David Mitton,et al.  3D reconstruction method from biplanar radiography using non-stereocorresponding points and elastic deformable meshes , 2000, Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing.

[9]  Hip stability in primary total hip arthroplasty using an anatomically sized femoral head. , 2009, Orthopedics.

[10]  Ralph R. Martin,et al.  Robust Segmentation of Primitives from Range Data in the Presence of Geometric Degeneracy , 2001, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[11]  J. M. Lynch,et al.  Quantifying temporal bone morphology of great apes and humans: an approach using geometric morphometrics , 2002, Journal of anatomy.

[12]  S. Laporte,et al.  Three-dimensional (3D) detailed reconstruction of human vertebrae from low-dose digital stereoradiography , 2003, European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology.

[13]  Martin Styner,et al.  Accurate and Robust Reconstruction of a Surface Model of the Proximal Femur From Sparse-Point Data and a Dense-Point Distribution Model for Surgical Navigation , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[14]  Daniel Kluess,et al.  Influence of femoral head size on impingement, dislocation and stress distribution in total hip replacement. , 2007, Medical engineering & physics.

[15]  B. Morrey,et al.  Soft-tissue balancing of the hip: the role of femoral offset restoration. , 2004, Instructional course lectures.

[16]  R Philippot,et al.  Femoral offset: anatomical concept, definition, assessment, implications for preoperative templating and hip arthroplasty. , 2009, Orthopaedics & traumatology, surgery & research : OTSR.

[17]  Y. Yoshioka,et al.  The anatomy and functional axes of the femur. , 1987, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[18]  J Vander Sloten,et al.  Accuracy assessment of CT-based outer surface femur meshes , 2008, Computer aided surgery : official journal of the International Society for Computer Aided Surgery.

[19]  S. B. Park,et al.  Measurement of femoral neck anteversion in 3D. Part 2:3D modelling method , 2006, Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing.

[20]  Karl Rohr,et al.  Localization of Anatomical Point Landmarks in 3D Medical Images by Fitting 3D Parametric Intensity Models , 2003, IPMI.

[21]  Giancarlo Ferrigno,et al.  Navigation in Computer Assisted Orthopaedic Surgery , 2008 .

[22]  H. L. Roh,et al.  True femoral anteversion during primary total hip arthroplasty: use of postoperative computed tomography-based sections. , 2006, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[23]  D Mitton,et al.  A Biplanar Reconstruction Method Based on 2D and 3D Contours: Application to the Distal Femur , 2003, Computer methods in biomechanics and biomedical engineering.

[24]  Pietro Cerveri,et al.  Combined evolution strategies for dynamic calibration of video-based measurement systems , 2001, IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput..

[25]  I. Kim,et al.  Design optimization of a total hip prosthesis for wear reduction. , 2009, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[26]  E Y Chao,et al.  Biomechanics of malalignment. , 1994, The Orthopedic clinics of North America.

[27]  J. Victor,et al.  How precise can bony landmarks be determined on a CT scan of the knee? , 2009, The Knee.

[28]  Kaj Fagervik,et al.  Optimization of an , 1999 .

[29]  J. D. De Guise,et al.  3D reconstruction of the proximal femur with low-dose digital stereoradiography , 2004, Computer aided surgery : official journal of the International Society for Computer Aided Surgery.

[30]  J.A. De Guise,et al.  Automated Method for Clinic and Morphologic Analysis of Bones Using Implicit Modeling Technique , 2007, 2007 29th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[31]  Beat Schmutz,et al.  Development and validation of a generic 3D model of the distal femur , 2006, Computer methods in biomechanics and biomedical engineering.

[32]  Banchong Mahaisavariya,et al.  Morphological study of the proximal femur: a new method of geometrical assessment using 3-dimensional reverse engineering. , 2002, Medical engineering & physics.