International health IT benchmarking: learning from cross-country comparisons

Objective: To pilot benchmark measures of health information and communication technology (ICT) availability and use to facilitate cross-country learning. Materials and Methods: A prior Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development–led effort involving 30 countries selected and defined functionality-based measures for availability and use of electronic health records, health information exchange, personal health records, and telehealth. In this pilot, an Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development Working Group compiled results for 38 countries for a subset of measures with broad coverage using new and/or adapted country-specific or multinational surveys and other sources from 2012 to 2015. We also synthesized country learnings to inform future benchmarking. Results: While electronic records are widely used to store and manage patient information at the point of care—all but 2 pilot countries reported use by at least half of primary care physicians; many had rates above 75%—patient information exchange across organizations/settings is less common. Large variations in the availability and use of telehealth and personal health records also exist. Discussion: Pilot participation demonstrated interest in cross-national benchmarking. Using the most comparable measures available to date, it showed substantial diversity in health ICT availability and use in all domains. The project also identified methodological considerations (e.g., structural and health systems issues that can affect measurement) important for future comparisons. Conclusion: While health policies and priorities differ, many nations aim to increase access, quality, and/or efficiency of care through effective ICT use. By identifying variations and describing key contextual factors, benchmarking offers the potential to facilitate cross-national learning and accelerate the progress of individual countries.

[1]  Charlene R. Weir,et al.  Reviewing the impact of computerized provider order entry on clinical outcomes: The quality of systematic reviews , 2012, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[2]  E. Thomas,et al.  Tele-ICU: Experience To Date , 2010, Journal of intensive care medicine.

[3]  Trisha Greenhalgh,et al.  Introducing a nationally shared electronic patient record: Case study comparison of Scotland, England, Wales and Northern Ireland , 2013, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[4]  J. Zelmer,et al.  Understanding the gap between desire for and use of consumer health solutions. , 2014, HealthcarePapers.

[5]  Jeffrey S McCullough,et al.  The adoption of hospital information systems. , 2008, Health economics.

[6]  Johanna Kaipio,et al.  User experiences with different regional health information exchange systems in Finland , 2013, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[7]  Francisco Lupiáñez-Villanueva,et al.  Benchmarking Deployment of Ehealth Among General Practitioners , 2018 .

[8]  Christian Nøhr,et al.  Monitoring the Amount of Practical Use of eHealth on National Level by Use of Log Data: Lessons Learned , 2015, CSHI.

[9]  M. Kangas,et al.  Nordic eHealth Benchmarking , 2015 .

[10]  Craig E. Kuziemsky,et al.  A review on systematic reviews of health information system studies , 2010, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[11]  Ursula Hübner,et al.  Characteristics of German Hospitals Adopting Health IT Systems - Results from an Empirical Study , 2011, MIE.

[12]  Mark L. Diana,et al.  Exploring Hospitals' Adoption of Information Technology , 2002, Journal of Medical Systems.

[13]  C. Goldzweig,et al.  Costs and benefits of health information technology: new trends from the literature. , 2009, Health affairs.

[14]  H. Mcdonald,et al.  Effects of computerized clinical decision support systems on practitioner performance and patient outcomes: a systematic review. , 2005, JAMA.

[15]  Elske Ammenwerth,et al.  IT adoption of clinical information systems in Austrian and German hospitals: results of a comparative survey with a focus on nursing , 2010, BMC Medical Informatics Decis. Mak..

[16]  Ioannis Maghiros,et al.  European Hospital Survey: Benchmarking deployment of e-Health services (2012–2013) – Methodological report , 2013 .

[17]  P. Shekelle,et al.  Systematic Review: Impact of Health Information Technology on Quality, Efficiency, and Costs of Medical Care , 2006, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[18]  Julia Adler-Milstein,et al.  Benchmarking health IT among OECD countries: better data for better policy , 2014, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..