Vehicle Platoon Control in High-Latency Wireless Communications Environment

Recent developments in vehicle onboard computers and vehicle-to-vehicle communications technology allow automatic control of vehicles and the organization of vehicles into platoons with short intraplatoon distances. One of the major issues with platoon control is latency in wireless communications. Latency has a negative impact on safety and disrupts the stability of platoons. A decentralized longitudinal platoon-controlling mechanism that uses a model predictive control approach to control vehicles safely, even in harsh communications environments, is proposed. The sensitivity of this method was analyzed to derive the conditions for this method to work safely. A simulation test bed for this control method was implemented to test effectiveness and safety under two communications latency settings. The results showed that the model predictive control method could safely control the platoon even in harsh communications environments.

[1]  Subir Biswas,et al.  Vehicle-to-vehicle wireless communication protocols for enhancing highway traffic safety , 2006, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[2]  Andrea Goldsmith,et al.  Effects of communication delay on string stability in vehicle platoons , 2001, ITSC 2001. 2001 IEEE Intelligent Transportation Systems. Proceedings (Cat. No.01TH8585).

[3]  Nick McKeown,et al.  Automated vehicle control developments in the PATH program , 1991 .

[4]  Rajesh Rajamani,et al.  Semi-autonomous adaptive cruise control systems , 2002, IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol..

[5]  Francois Dion,et al.  Safety Assessment of Information Delay on Performance of Intelligent Vehicle Control System , 2006 .

[6]  R. Horowitz,et al.  Control design of an automated highway system , 2000, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[7]  Fan Bai,et al.  Reliability Analysis of DSRC Wireless Communication for Vehicle Safety Applications , 2006, 2006 IEEE Intelligent Transportation Systems Conference.

[8]  P. Varaiya,et al.  Sketch of an IVHS systems architecture , 1991, Vehicle Navigation and Information Systems Conference, 1991.

[9]  Wei-Bin Zhang,et al.  Demonstration of integrated longitudinal and lateral control for the operation of automated vehicles in platoons , 2000, IEEE Trans. Control. Syst. Technol..

[10]  Panganamala Ramana Kumar,et al.  RHEINISCH-WESTFÄLISCHE TECHNISCHE HOCHSCHULE AACHEN , 2001 .

[11]  Petros A. Ioannou,et al.  Using front and back information for tight vehicle following maneuvers , 1999 .

[12]  Jan M. Maciejowski,et al.  Predictive control : with constraints , 2002 .

[13]  Eduardo Fernandez-Camacho,et al.  Model Predictive Control in the Process Industry , 1995 .

[14]  Rajesh Rajamani,et al.  An Experimental Comparative Study of Autonomous and Co-operative Vehicle-follower Control Systems , 2001 .

[15]  Pravin Varaiya,et al.  Smart cars on smart roads: problems of control , 1991, IEEE Trans. Autom. Control..

[16]  J. Hedrick,et al.  String stability of interconnected systems , 1995, Proceedings of 1995 American Control Conference - ACC'95.

[17]  Hariharan Krishnan,et al.  Adaptive intervehicle communication control for cooperative safety systems , 2010, IEEE Network.

[18]  Z. Papp,et al.  Traffic control and intelligent vehicle highway systems: a survey , 2011 .

[19]  C. Y. Cheng,et al.  Autonomous intelligent cruise control using both front and back information for tight vehicle following maneuvers , 1995, Proceedings of 1995 American Control Conference - ACC'95.

[20]  B. De Schutter,et al.  Model-based predictive traffic control for intelligent vehicles: Dynamic speed limits and dynamic lane allocation , 2008, 2008 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium.

[21]  Roy S. Smith,et al.  Closed-Loop Dynamics of Cooperative Vehicle Formations With Parallel Estimators and Communication , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.