Outcomes of the RESTOR-MV Trial (Randomized Evaluation of a Surgical Treatment for Off-Pump Repair of the Mitral Valve).

OBJECTIVES we sought to determine whether patients with functional mitral regurgitation (FMR) would benefit from ventricular reshaping by the Coapsys device (Myocor, Inc., Maple Grove, Minnesota). BACKGROUND FMR occurs when ventricular remodeling impairs valve function. Coapsys is a ventricular shape change device placed without cardiopulmonary bypass to reduce FMR. It compresses the mitral annulus and reshapes the ventricle. We hypothesized that Coapsys for FMR would improve clinical outcomes compared with standard therapies. METHODS RESTOR-MV (Randomized Evaluation of a Surgical Treatment for Off-Pump Repair of the Mitral Valve) was a randomized, prospective, multicenter study of patients with FMR and coronary disease with core laboratory analysis. After enrollment, patients were stratified to the standard indicated surgery: either coronary artery bypass graft alone or coronary artery bypass graft with mitral valve repair. In each stratum, randomization was to either control (indicated surgery) or treatment (coronary artery bypass graft with Coapsys ventricular reshaping). RESULTS the study was terminated when the sponsor failed to secure ongoing funding; 165 patients were randomized. Control and Coapsys both produced decreases in left ventricular (LV) end-diastolic dimension and MR at 2 years (p < 0.001); Coapsys provided a greater decrease in LV end-diastolic dimension (p = 0.021). Control had lower MR grades during follow-up (p = 0.01). Coapsys showed a survival advantage compared with control at 2 years (87% vs. 77%) (hazard ratio: 0.421; 95% confidence interval: 0.200 to 0.886; stratified log-rank test; p = 0.038). Complication-free survival (including death, stroke, myocardial infarction, and valve reoperation) was significantly greater with Coapsys at 2 years (85% vs. 71%) (hazard ratio: 0.372; 95% confidence interval: 0.185 to 0.749; adjusted log-rank test; p = 0.019). CONCLUSIONS analysis of RESTOR-MV indicates that patients with FMR requiring revascularization treated with ventricular reshaping rather than standard surgery had improved survival and a significant decrease in major adverse outcomes. This trial validates the concept of the ventricular reshaping strategy in this subset of patients with heart failure. (Randomized Evaluation of a Surgical Treatment for Off-Pump Repair of the Mitral Valve [RESTOR-MV]; NCT00120276).

[1]  Christopher M O'Connor,et al.  Coronary bypass surgery with or without surgical ventricular reconstruction. , 2009, The New England journal of medicine.

[2]  Philippe Ravaud,et al.  What are the characteristics of patients with severe, symptomatic, mitral regurgitation who are denied surgery? , 2007, European heart journal.

[3]  G. Frati,et al.  Should Mild‐to‐Moderate and Moderate Ischemic Mitral Regurgitation Be Corrected in Patients with Impaired Left Ventricular Function Undergoing Simultaneous Coronary Revascularization? , 2001, Journal of cardiac surgery.

[4]  A. Galloway,et al.  Late Results of Isolated Mitral Annuloplasty for “Functional” Ischemic Mitral Insufficiency , 2001, Journal of cardiac surgery.

[5]  M. Carrier,et al.  Is a good perioperative echocardiographic result predictive of durability in ischemic mitral valve repair? , 2006, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[6]  S. Bolling,et al.  Impact of mitral valve annuloplasty on mortality risk in patients with mitral regurgitation and left ventricular systolic dysfunction. , 2005, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[7]  W. Weintraub,et al.  Off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting provides complete revascularization with reduced myocardial injury, transfusion requirements, and length of stay: a prospective randomized comparison of two hundred unselected patients undergoing off-pump versus conventional coronary artery bypass grafting. , 2003, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[8]  F. Loop,et al.  Mitral valve repair for ischemic mitral insufficiency. , 1991, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[9]  J. Hung,et al.  Long-term survival after surgical revascularization for moderate ischemic mitral regurgitation. , 2005, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[10]  Jeroen J. Bax,et al.  Restrictive Annuloplasty and Coronary Revascularization in Ischemic Mitral Regurgitation Results in Reverse Left Ventricular Remodeling , 2004, Circulation.

[11]  C. Duran,et al.  Outcome after mitral valve repair for functional ischemic mitral regurgitation. , 2002, The Journal of heart valve disease.

[12]  James D. Thomas,et al.  Optimal Mitral Annular and Subvalvular Shape Change Created by the Coapsys Device to Treat Functional Mitral Regurgitation , 2005, ASAIO journal.

[13]  S. Gallina,et al.  Mitral valve procedure in dilated cardiomyopathy: repair or replacement? , 2001, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[14]  R. Siegel,et al.  Ischemic mitral regurgitation: revascularization alone versus revascularization and mitral valve repair. , 2005, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[15]  Gideon Cohen,et al.  Recurrent mitral regurgitation after annuloplasty for functional ischemic mitral regurgitation. , 2004, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[16]  K. Kuck,et al.  Downsizing of the mitral valve and coronary revascularization in severe ischemic mitral regurgitation results in reverse left ventricular and left atrial remodeling. , 2005, European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery.

[17]  C Di Mario,et al.  Coronary stenting after rotational atherectomy in calcified and complex lesions. Angiographic and clinical follow-up results. , 1997, Circulation.

[18]  Philippe Pibarot,et al.  Restrictive annuloplasty for ischemic mitral regurgitation may induce functional mitral stenosis. , 2008, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[19]  Arthur W Wallace,et al.  Myosplint decreases wall stress without depressing function in the failing heart: a finite element model study. , 2003, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[20]  A. Bolger,et al.  Geometric determinants of ischemic mitral regurgitation. , 1997, Circulation.

[21]  S. Ellis,et al.  Impact of mitral regurgitation on long-term survival after percutaneous coronary intervention. , 2002, The American journal of cardiology.

[22]  L. Shaw,et al.  Patient survival characteristics after routine mitral valve repair for ischemic mitral regurgitation. , 2005, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[23]  S. Mittal,et al.  Coapsys mitral annuloplasty for chronic functional ischemic mitral regurgitation: 1-year results. , 2006, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[24]  Torben V. Schroeder,et al.  Ultrasonic Echolucent Carotid Plaques Predict Future Strokes , 2001, Circulation.

[25]  K. Anstrom,et al.  Survival After Coronary Revascularization, With and Without Mitral Valve Surgery, in Patients With Ischemic Mitral Regurgitation , 2003, Circulation.

[26]  B. Lytle,et al.  Ischemic versus degenerative mitral regurgitation: does etiology affect survival? , 2005, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[27]  G. Buckberg,et al.  The STICH trial: misguided conclusions. , 2009, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[28]  P. DiGiorgi,et al.  Comparison of Coapsys annuloplasty and internal reduction mitral annuloplasty in the randomized treatment of functional ischemic mitral regurgitation: impact on the left ventricle. , 2006, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[29]  L. Cohn,et al.  Does Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Alone Correct Moderate Ischemic Mitral Regurgitation? , 2001, Circulation.