New instruments – old practices? The implications of environmental management systems and extended producer responsibility for design for the environment

As the focus of environmental policy and management is shifting from cleaner production at the process level towards greener products, there is a need for new kinds of policy instruments and initiatives. Environmental management systems (EMSs) and extended producer responsibility (EPR) systems are efforts to overcome the limitations of the traditional regulatory approach. In this paper, I illustrate how EMSs and EPR systems have influenced the emergence of greener products in three case companies. These case studies are complemented by results from a survey on design for the environment in the electrical and electronics industry. Both the case studies and the survey indicate that the linkage between EMSs and product development is weak or completely missing. Therefore, the mere existence of an EMS can hardly be used as a convincing indicator of the implementation of an environmentally friendly design process. The results regarding the EPR systems are more positive. Copyright © 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd and ERP Environment.

[2]  W. Scott,et al.  Institutions and Organizations. , 1995 .

[3]  Henrikke Baumann,et al.  Mapping the green product development field: engineering, policy and business perspectives , 2002 .

[4]  R. McKay.  Organizational Responses to an Environmental Bill of Rights , 2001 .

[5]  Lorraine Mazerolle,et al.  Third Party Policing and Insurance: The Case of Market-Based Crime Prevention , 2000 .

[6]  A. Jamison.  The Making of Green Knowledge: Environmental Politics and Cultural Transformation , 2001 .

[7]  F. Rubik,et al.  Integrated Product Policy (IPP) in Europe—a development model and some impressions , 2002 .

[8]  M. Delmas.  The diffusion of environmental management standards in Europe and in the United States: An institutional perspective , 2002 .

[9]  C. Oliver.  STRATEGIC RESPONSES TO INSTITUTIONAL PROCESSES , 1991 .

[10]  Pieter Glasbergen,et al.  The Question of Environmental Governance , 1998 .

[11]  Mikael Skou Andersen,et al.  Governance by Green Taxes: Making Pollution Prevention Pay , 1994 .

[12]  A. Jamison.  The Making of Green Knowledge , 2001 .

[13]  F. Boons,et al.  Trajectories of Greening , 2000 .

[14]  Evert Vedung,et al.  Public Policy and Program Evaluation , 1997 .

[15]  Neil Gunningham,et al.  Partnerships, management systems and the search for innovative regulation in the vehicle body shop industry , 2002 .

[16]  J. Ehrenfeld,et al.  Organizing for effective environmental design , 1997 .

[17]  R. Yin.  Case Study Research: Design and Methods , 1984 .

[18]  A. Spicer,et al.  Third-party demanufacturing as a solution for extended producer responsibility , 2004 .

[19]  Naoko Tojo,et al.  Analysis of EPR Policies and Legislation through omparative study of selected EPR programmes for EEE-Based on the in-depth study of a Japanese EPR regulation , 2000 .

[20]  Steve Poole,et al.  Environmental priorities in strategic product development , 2000 .

[21]  Thomas Lindhqvist,et al.  Extended Producer Responsibility in Cleaner Production: Policy Principle to Promote Environmental Improvements of Product Systems , 2000 .

[22]  René van Berkel,et al.  Opportunities and constraints for Product-oriented Environmental Management Systems (P-EMS) , 1999 .

[23]  Meadowcroft.  Cooperative Management Regimes: Collaborative Problem-Solving to Implement Sustainable Development , 1999 .

[24]  T. Tietenberg.  Economic Instruments for Environmental Regulation , 1990 .

[25]  K. Eisenhardt.  Building theories from case study research , 1989, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.