Solvent-induced distortions and the curvature of α-helices

The α-helix defined in 1951 by Pauling et al. 1 on the basis of model building and X-ray fibre diffraction data has 3.65 residues per turn (n) achieved with planar peptides, torsion angles of φ = −48° and ψ = −57° and hydrogen bonds which are close to linear. Although X-ray analyses of proteins have confirmed the general correctness of the model for the helix, recent high resolution (1.7–1.0 Å) diffraction studies have shown that the parameters described by Pauling et al. 1 and later by Perutz2 and Arnott and Wonacott3 are not a good description of the α-helices in globular proteins4–7, where the mean values of φ, ψ, are usually close to −63°, −42°. Here we show that these values arise as a mean of two significantly different classes in amphipathic helices depending on whether the peptide carbonyl oxygen is hydrogen bonded to a solvent or polar side-chain atom. The hydrogen bonds made by the hydrophilic carbonyls to the NH groups within helices are longer and less linear than those involving hydrophobic carbonyls. We also show that these effects are associated with a significant curvature of helices in globular proteins. For example, the α-helix in avian pancreatic peptide (aPP) has a radius of curvature of approximately 70 Å. These results are of significance in the packing of helices in fibrous and globular proteins, in the calculation of their dipole moments, solvent accessibilities and internal energies, and in the theoretical estimation of spectroscopic properties such as circular dichroism and Raman scattering.

[1]  S. Arnott,et al.  Atomic co-ordinates for an alpha-helix: refinement of the crystal structure of alpha-poly-l-alanine. , 1966, Journal of molecular biology.

[2]  J. C. Kendrew,et al.  Structure and function of haemoglobin: II. Some relations between polypeptide chain configuration and amino acid sequence , 1965 .

[3]  H. Watson,et al.  The Stereochemistry of the Protein Myoglobin , 1976 .

[4]  L. Pauling,et al.  The structure of proteins; two hydrogen-bonded helical configurations of the polypeptide chain. , 1951, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[5]  T. Blundell,et al.  Conformational flexibility in a small globular hormone: X‐ray analysis of avian pancreatic polypeptide at 0.98‐Å resolution , 1983, Biopolymers.

[6]  David Eisenberg,et al.  The helical hydrophobic moment: a measure of the amphiphilicity of a helix , 1982, Nature.

[7]  M. Perutz,et al.  New X-Ray Evidence on the Configuration of Polypeptide Chains: Polypeptide Chains in Poly-γ-benzyl-L-glutamate, Keratin and Hæmoglobin , 1951, Nature.

[8]  W. Steigemann,et al.  Structure of erythrocruorin in different ligand states refined at 1.4 A resolution. , 1979, Journal of molecular biology.

[9]  E N Baker,et al.  Structure of actinidin, after refinement at 1.7 A resolution. , 1980, Journal of molecular biology.

[10]  Structural Studies on Molecules of Biological Interest: A volume in honour of Professor Dorothy Hodgkin Edited by Guy Dodson, Jenny P. Glusker and David Sayre Clarendon Press; Oxford, 1981 , 1983 .

[11]  I. C. Golton,et al.  Solvent effects and polar interactions in the structural stability and dynamics of globular proteins. , 1980, Biophysical journal.