The Role of Angels in Technology SMEs: A Link to Venture Capital

The presence of angels among early-stage financiers of new technology-based firms should improve chances of eventual venture capital financing. Reasons to expect that firms with private investment would have easier access to venture capital are discussed. This study presents findings that support this expectation. A total of 57% of the firms that had received private investor financing had also received financing from institutional venture capitalists; only 10% of firms that had not received angel financing obtained venture capital. Angel investor financing was a significant explanatory variable (among others) of differences between venture capital recipients and firms that had not received venture capital. It would appear that angels help firms to become more ready for future stages of investment by, among other contributions, being closely involved with the firms in which they invest. They usually provide advice and networking opportunities. They also serve on Boards of Directors and Advisors, and provide hands-on assistance and business intelligence. Angels also fulfill an important accreditation role. Overall, this study provides empirical support for the expectation that involvement of angels can substantially increase the attractiveness of firms to institutional venture capitalists.

[1]  George H. Haines,et al.  Private investors' investment criteria: Insights from qualitative data , 1999 .

[2]  C. Mason,et al.  Informal Venture Capital: Investors, Investments and Policy Issues in Finland , 1998 .

[3]  R. Harrison,et al.  Informal venture capital: a study of the investment process, the post-investment experience and investment performance , 1996 .

[4]  Richard T. Harrison,et al.  Why 'Business Angels' Say No: A Case Study of Opportunities Rejected by an Informal Investor Syndicate , 1996 .

[5]  Charles W. Hofer,et al.  The Use of Verbal Protocols in Determining Venture Capitalists’ Decision Processes , 1989 .

[6]  A. Noble.  Raising finance from business angels , 2001 .

[7]  M. Lerner,et al.  Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research , 2003 .

[8]  Elizabeth Chell,et al.  Networking, entrepreneurship and microbusiness behaviour , 2000 .

[9]  S. Prowse,et al.  The Private Equity Market: An Overveiw , 1997 .

[10]  Alex Miller,et al.  Segmenting the informal venture capital market: Economic, hedonistic, and altruistic investors , 1996 .

[11]  Jeffrey Sohl,et al.  Angels and non-angels: Are there differences? , 1994 .

[12]  Charles W. Hofer,et al.  Venture capitalists' decision criteria in new venture evaluation , 1993 .

[13]  R. Harrison,et al.  Venture capital market complementarities: The links between business angels and venture capital funds in the United Kingdom , 2000 .

[14]  G. George,et al.  Networking strategy of boards: implications for small and medium-sized enterprises , 2001 .

[15]  Richard T. Harrison,et al.  Closing the regional equity capital gap: The role of informal venture capital , 1995 .

[16]  M. Freel,et al.  External linkages and product innovation in small manufacturing firms , 2000 .

[17]  Tyzoon T. Tyebjee,et al.  A Model of Venture Capitalist Investment Activity , 1984 .

[18]  J. Freear,et al.  Who bankrolls high-tech entrepreneurs? , 1990 .

[19]  W. Vanhaverbeke.  Realizing new regional core competencies: establishing a customer-oriented SME network , 2001 .

[20]  Robert J. Robinson,et al.  Angel investing : matching start-up funds with start-up companies : the guide for entrepreneurs, individual investors, and venture capitalists , 2000 .

[21]  Vance H. Fried,et al.  Toward a Model of Venture Capital Investment Decision Making , 1994 .

[22]  C. B. Barry,et al.  New Directions in Research on Venture Capital Finance , 1994 .

[23]  R. Harrison,et al.  International perspectives on the supply of informal venture capital , 1992 .

[24]  R. Knight,et al.  CRITERIA USED BY VENTURE CAPITALISTS , 1986 .

[25]  R. Harrison,et al.  Informal Venture Capital in the UK , 1994 .

[26]  Ian C. MacMillan,et al.  Criteria Used by Venture Capitalists to Evaluate New Venture Proposals , 1985 .

[27]  Ian C. MacMillan,et al.  Venture capitalists' involvement in their investments: Extent and performance , 1989 .

[28]  R. Harding.  Plugging the knowledge gap: An international comparison of the role for policy in the venture capital market , 2002 .

[29]  H. Landström.  Informal risk capital in Sweden and some international comparisons , 1993 .

[30]  Allen N. Berger,et al.  The Economics of Small Business Finance: The Roles of Private Equity and Debt Markets in the Financial Growth Cycle , 1998 .