EMG classification using wavelet functions to determine muscle contraction

Abstract Surface electromyogram (SEMG) is a complex signal and is influenced by several external factors/artifacts. The electromyogram signal from the stump of the subject is picked up through surface electrodes. It is amplified and artifacts are removed before digitising it in a controlled manner so that minimum signal loss occurs due to processing. As removing these artifacts is not easy, feature extraction to obtain useful information hidden inside the signal becomes a different process. This paper presents methods of analysing SEMG signals using discrete wavelet Transform (DWT) for extracting accurate patterns of the signals and the performance of the used algorithms is being analysed rigorously. The obtained results suggest a root mean square difference (RMSD) value for the denoising and quality of reconstruction of the SEMG signal. The result shows that the best mother wavelets for tolerance of noise are second order of symmlets and bior6.8. Results inferred that bior6.8 suitable for the classification and analysis of SEMG signals of different arm motions results in a classification accuracy of 88.90%.

[1]  V. karan,et al.  Wavelet Transform-Based Classification of Electromyogram Signals Using an Anova Technique , 2015, Neurophysiology.

[2]  Karan Veer,et al.  Development of sensor system with measurement of surface electromyogram signal for clinical use , 2016 .

[3]  Ravinder Agarwal,et al.  Wavelet denoising and evaluation of electromyogram signal using statistical algorithm , 2014 .

[4]  Mamun Bin Ibne Reaz,et al.  Electromyography signal analysis using wavelet transform and higher order statistics to determine muscle contraction , 2009, Expert Syst. J. Knowl. Eng..

[5]  A. Phinyomark,et al.  An optimal wavelet function based on wavelet denoising for multifunction myoelectric control , 2009, 2009 6th International Conference on Electrical Engineering/Electronics, Computer, Telecommunications and Information Technology.

[6]  Sridhar P. Arjunan,et al.  A sEMG model with experimentally based simulation parameters , 2010, 2010 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology.

[7]  Pak-Chung Ching,et al.  On wavelet denoising and its applications to time delay estimation , 1999, IEEE Trans. Signal Process..

[8]  S Micera,et al.  Control of Hand Prostheses Using Peripheral Information , 2010, IEEE Reviews in Biomedical Engineering.

[9]  J.C. Pereira,et al.  Evaluation of adaptive/nonadaptive filtering and wavelet transform techniques for noise reduction in EMG mobile acquisition equipment , 2003, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[10]  Tanu Sharma,et al.  WAVELET BASED FEATURE EXTRACTION OF ELECTROMYOGRAM SIGNAL FOR DENOISING , 2014 .

[11]  Pornchai Phukpattaranont,et al.  WAVELET-BASED DENOISING ALGORITHM FOR ROBUST EMG PATTERN RECOGNITION , 2011 .

[12]  A. Phinyomark,et al.  Optimal Wavelet Functions in Wavelet Denoising for Multifunction Myoelectric Control , 2009, ECTI Transactions on Electrical Engineering, Electronics, and Communications.