DDSolver: An Add-In Program for Modeling and Comparison of Drug Dissolution Profiles

In recent years, several mathematical models have been developed for analysis of drug dissolution data, and many different mathematical approaches have been proposed to assess the similarity between two drug dissolution profiles. However, until now, no computer program has been reported for simplifying the calculations involved in the modeling and comparison of dissolution profiles. The purposes of this article are: (1) to describe the development of a software program, called DDSolver, for facilitating the assessment of similarity between drug dissolution data; (2) to establish a model library for fitting dissolution data using a nonlinear optimization method; and (3) to provide a brief review of available approaches for comparing drug dissolution profiles. DDSolver is a freely available program which is capable of performing most existing techniques for comparing drug release data, including exploratory data analysis, univariate ANOVA, ratio test procedures, the difference factor f1, the similarity factor f2, the Rescigno indices, the 90% confidence interval (CI) of difference method, the multivariate statistical distance method, the model-dependent method, the bootstrap f2 method, and Chow and Ki’s time series method. Sample runs of the program demonstrated that the results were satisfactory, and DDSolver could be served as a useful tool for dissolution data analysis.

[1]  D. Brockmeier In vitro/in vivo correlation of dissolution using moments of dissolution and transit times , 1986 .

[2]  John A. Nelder,et al.  A Simplex Method for Function Minimization , 1965, Comput. J..

[3]  J. Polli,et al.  Methods to compare dissolution profiles and a rationale for wide dissolution specifications for metoprolol tartrate tablets. , 1997, Journal of pharmaceutical sciences.

[4]  J. W. Moore,et al.  Mathematical comparison of dissolution profiles , 1996 .

[5]  N. Peppas,et al.  Modelling of sustained release of water-soluble drugs from porous, hydrophobic polymers. , 1982, Biomaterials.

[6]  R. Bartoszynski,et al.  Statistical comparison of dissolution curves. , 2001, Pharmacological research.

[7]  John E. Hogan,et al.  MATHEMATICAL MODELLING OF DRUG RELEASE FROM HYDROXYPROPYLMETHYLCELLULOSE MATRICES : EFFECT OF TEMPERATURE , 1991 .

[8]  H J Motulsky,et al.  Fitting curves to data using nonlinear regression: a practical and nonmathematical review , 1987, FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology.

[9]  Yi Tsong,et al.  In-Vitro Dissolution Profile Comparison: Statistics and Analysis, Model Dependent Approach , 1996, Pharmaceutical Research.

[10]  T. Phaechamud Variables Influencing Drug Release from Layered Matrix System Comprising Hydroxypropyl Methylcellulose , 2008, AAPS PharmSciTech.

[11]  Y. Zambito,et al.  A new hydrogel for the extended and complete prednisolone release in the GI tract. , 2006, International journal of pharmaceutics.

[12]  S. Chow,et al.  Statistical Evaluation of Similarity Factor f_2 as a Criterion for Assessment of Similarity Between Dissolution Profiles , 1997 .

[13]  S. Borodkin,et al.  Linear drug release from laminated hydroxypropyl cellulose-polyvinyl acetate films. , 1975, Journal of pharmaceutical sciences.

[14]  K. Kosmidis,et al.  On the use of the Weibull function for the discernment of drug release mechanisms. , 2006, International journal of pharmaceutics.

[15]  Yi Tsong,et al.  In Vitro Dissolution Profile Comparison—Statistics and Analysis of the Similarity Factor, f2 , 1998, Pharmaceutical Research.

[16]  F. Podczeck,et al.  The Use of Statistical Moment Analysis to Elucidate the Mechanism of Release of a Model Drug from Pellets Produced by Extrusion and Spheronisation , 1997 .

[17]  P. Costa,et al.  Modeling and comparison of dissolution profiles. , 2001, European journal of pharmaceutical sciences : official journal of the European Federation for Pharmaceutical Sciences.

[18]  A. W. Hixson,et al.  Dependence of Reaction Velocity upon surface and Agitation , 1931 .

[19]  Richard W. Baker,et al.  Controlled Release of Biologically Active Agents , 1987 .

[20]  Chee Peng Lim,et al.  Use of Artificial Neural Networks to Predict Drug Dissolution Profiles and Evaluation of Network Performance Using Similarity Factor , 2000, Pharmaceutical Research.

[21]  J. Sousa,et al.  Comparison of dissolution profiles of Ibuprofen pellets. , 2003, Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society.

[22]  S. Chow,et al.  ON THE ASSESSMENT OF SIMILARITY FOR DISSOLUTION PROFILES OF TWO DRUG PRODUCTS , 2002, Journal of biopharmaceutical statistics.

[23]  N. Peppas Analysis of Fickian and non-Fickian drug release from polymers. , 1985, Pharmaceutica acta Helvetiae.

[24]  D. R. Lu,et al.  Nonlinear data fitting for controlled release devices: An integrated computer program , 1996 .

[25]  F Langenbucher,et al.  Letters to the Editor: Linearization of dissolution rate curves by the Weibull distribution , 1972, The Journal of pharmacy and pharmacology.

[26]  Fumiyoshi Yamashita,et al.  Mechanistic and empirical modeling of skin permeation of drugs. , 2003, Advanced drug delivery reviews.

[27]  N. Anderson,et al.  An evaluation of fit factors and dissolution efficiency for the comparison of in vitro dissolution profiles. , 1998, Journal of pharmaceutical and biomedical analysis.

[28]  S. Chow,et al.  Statistical comparison between dissolution profiles of drug products. , 1997, Journal of biopharmaceutical statistics.

[29]  D. Coomans,et al.  Application of linear mixed effects models to the evaluation of dissolution profiles. , 2001, International journal of pharmaceutics.

[30]  N. Peppas,et al.  A simple equation for the description of solute release. III. Coupling of diffusion and relaxation , 1989 .

[31]  T. Phaechamud,et al.  Mechanistic modeling of drug release from chitosan coated tablets. , 2001, Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society.

[32]  Matrix tablets containing HPMC and polyamide 12 : comparison of dissolution data using the Gompertz function , 1994 .

[33]  N. Peppas,et al.  Mechanisms of solute release from porous hydrophilic polymers , 1983 .

[34]  H. Hung,et al.  Analysis of drug dissolution data. , 1999, Statistics in medicine.

[35]  K. A. Khan The concept of dissolution efficiency , 1975, The Journal of pharmacy and pharmacology.

[36]  V. T. Stannett,et al.  Effect of particle size on the mechanism controlling n-hexane sorption in glassy polystyrene microspheres , 1977 .

[37]  R. Sutinen,et al.  Aqueous starch acetate dispersion as a novel coating material for controlled release products. , 2004, Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society.

[38]  J. Siepmann,et al.  Mathematical modeling of drug delivery. , 2008, International journal of pharmaceutics.

[39]  V. Shah,et al.  Statistical Assessment of Mean Differences between Two Dissolution Data Sets* , 1996 .

[40]  M. Gohel,et al.  Comparison of in vitro dissolution profiles: Using a novel, model-independent approach , 2000 .

[41]  O. Corrigan,et al.  An Investigation of the Mechanism of Release of the Amphoteric Drug Amoxycillin from Poly(d,l-Lactide-co-glycolide) Matrices , 2002, Pharmaceutical development and technology.

[42]  Mark R Berry,et al.  Statistical assessment of dissolution and drug release profile similarity using a model-dependent approach. , 2007, Journal of pharmaceutical and biomedical analysis.

[43]  M. Wolzt,et al.  Pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic profile of systemic nitric oxide-synthase inhibition with L-NMMA in humans. , 1999, British journal of clinical pharmacology.

[44]  O. Corrigan,et al.  Effect of poly-hydroxy aliphatic ester polymer type on amoxycillin release from cylindrical compacts. , 2003, International journal of pharmaceutics.

[45]  U. Banakar,et al.  Modelling of dissolution behaviour of controlled release systems , 1993 .

[46]  H. Akaike A new look at the statistical model identification , 1974 .

[47]  J. Liu,et al.  ASSESSMENT OF SIMILARITY BETWEEN DISSOLUTION PROFILES* , 2000, Journal of biopharmaceutical statistics.

[48]  Hans Leuenberger,et al.  Search for technological reasons to develop a capsule or a tablet formulation with respect to wettability and dissolution. , 2004, International journal of pharmaceutics.

[49]  J J Chen,et al.  Multipoint dissolution specification and acceptance sampling rule based on profile modeling and principal component analysis. , 1997, Journal of biopharmaceutical statistics.

[50]  V. Pillay,et al.  In vitro release modulation from crosslinked pellets for site-specific drug delivery to the gastrointestinal tract. I. Comparison of pH-responsive drug release and associated kinetics. , 1999, Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society.

[51]  T. Baykara,et al.  Comparison of in vitro dissolution profiles by ANOVA-based, model-dependent and -independent methods. , 2000, International journal of pharmaceutics.

[52]  E Comets,et al.  EVALUATION OF TESTS BASED ON INDIVIDUAL VERSUS POPULATION MODELING TO COMPARE DISSOLUTION CURVES , 2001, Journal of biopharmaceutical statistics.

[53]  T. Koizumi,et al.  Rate of release of medicaments from ointment bases containing drugs in suspension. , 1975, Chemical & pharmaceutical bulletin.

[54]  Thomas O'Hara,et al.  A REVIEW OF METHODS USED TO COMPARE DISSOLUTION PROFILE DATA , 1998 .

[55]  F. Podczeck COMPARISON OF IN-VITRO DISSOLUTION PROFILES BY CALCULATING MEAN DISSOLUTION TIME (MDT) OR MEAN RESIDENCE TIME (MRT) , 1993 .