Intensive teaching blocks in design disciplines: a practical application

Intensive teaching block weeks present a practical alternative to traditional teaching methods. This teaching method, if properly implemented, can provide a forum for concentrated learning, reflection and feedback. This paper discusses a study that investigated the use of intensive block weeks in the architectural design and technology context. The design week was mainly introduced to improve student participation and engagement, while teaching technical principles and promoting the development of soft skills in students. In addition to introducing what was done during the week, this paper presents findings from two questionnaire surveys, pre and post the design week as well as a summary of findings from the students' log books and focus group. Findings showed that the students agreed that this approach substantially increased their ability to learn and to apply learning for design tasks. It also facilitated the development of important soft skills such as teamwork, time management and presentation skills.

[1]  W. Martin Davies,et al.  Intensive Teaching Formats: A Review. , 2006 .

[2]  R. Burgess In the Field: An Introduction to Field Research , 1984 .

[3]  John W. Creswell,et al.  Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches , 2010 .

[4]  Don Weimer,et al.  Comparison of Traditional and Nontraditional (Adult Education) Undergraduate Business Programs , 2001 .

[5]  Amir Piroozfar,et al.  A practical approach to design of structures: a learning experiment through research, design and physical modelling , 2005 .

[6]  A. Duhs,et al.  Understanding learning and teaching: The experience of higher education , 2000 .

[7]  A. Hunter,et al.  Multimethod Research: A Synthesis of Styles , 1989 .

[8]  P. Ramsden Learning to Teach in Higher Education , 1991 .

[9]  Jennifer Rowley,et al.  Research and knowledge building in management studies: an analysis of methodological preferences. , 2006 .

[10]  Marc Seamon,et al.  Short-and Long-Term Differences in Instructional Effectiveness Between Intensive and Semester-Length Courses. , 2004 .

[11]  Donald A. Schön Educating the Reflective Practitioner: Toward a New Design for Teaching and Learning in the Professions , 1987 .

[12]  David Bruce Grant,et al.  Using block courses for teaching logistics , 2001 .

[13]  Nigel Cross,et al.  Expertise in Design: an overview , 2004 .

[14]  Nicolette Lee Design as a learning cycle: a conversational experience , 2006 .

[15]  J. C. Smart,et al.  Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research , 2001, Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research.

[16]  S. Walker,et al.  Teaching, Training and Learning: A Practical Guide , 1994 .

[17]  Conny J. M. Almekinders,et al.  Developing 'soft skills' in higher education , 2003 .

[18]  Michael Jay Polonsky,et al.  Marketing students' perception of traditional and intensive delivery : an exploratory study , 2007 .

[19]  Nicolette Lee,et al.  Project methods as the vehicle for learning in undergraduate design education: a typology , 2009 .