User Empowerment and Advanced Public Transport Solutions

Local Public Transport is vulnerable to reduction of public funding even when users’ expectations increase. The only way to develop and maintain adequate levels of service may be to promote solutions that rely on additional (cheap) resources. Those resources can be the users themselves, with their always-on personal devices and their willingness to participate in the improvement of this critical sector. This paper aims to show that more than competition and liberalization are needed to improve public transport services; the users’ positional disadvantage must be reduced and lack of power remedied. Infomobility should be personalized based on individual user preferences. Users should be empowered to influence the service, which will give flexibility to the system and foster bottom-up development. They can become partners in the design and innovation of public services and entrepreneurs in the exploitation of new services. The different levels of user involvement are described. In a traditional approach, user participation can be relatively passive: the Public Transport Service Provider can adopt models to capture and analyze patterns of user behavior. Public authority and service providers can rely on infrastructures, including sensors, probes, and bidirectional communication channels, of nearly zero cost for the transport operators. Following a widespread trend and the development of information technologies and social media, users can participate actively, even contributing to the design of new solutions. The paper, based on the recent literature on user-driven innovations, illustrates modes and roles of user participation in transport services, provides evidence of the feasibility of active user participation in innovation and design, and introduces design schemes that exploit information and telecommunication technologies, social networking, and crowdsourcing to involve users in the design and improvement of transport services. The final remarks outline a strategy in three steps to empower users and improve public transport services.

[1]  H. Timmermans,et al.  Traveler expectations and willingness-to-pay for Web-enabled public transport information services , 2006 .

[2]  Daren C. Brabham Crowdsourcing: A Model for Leveraging Online Communities , 2011 .

[3]  Joseph N. Prashker,et al.  The Impact of Travel Time Information on Travelers’ Learning under Uncertainty , 2006 .

[4]  Mark Hickman,et al.  PASSENGER TRAVEL TIME AND PATH CHOICE IMPLICATIONS OF REAL-TIME TRANSIT INFORMATION , 1995 .

[5]  Shuo-Yan Chou,et al.  Developing adaptive driving route guidance systems based on fuzzy neural network , 2008 .

[6]  Ralph Katz,et al.  Shifting Innovation to Users via Toolkits , 2002, Manag. Sci..

[7]  Sinem Bozkurt,et al.  A multicriteria route planning approach considering driver preferences , 2012, 2012 IEEE International Conference on Vehicular Electronics and Safety (ICVES 2012).

[8]  W. Baumol,et al.  MACROECONOMICS OF UNBALANCED GROWTH: THE ANATOMY OF THE URBAN CRISES , 1967 .

[9]  Margot Brereton,et al.  Never too old: engaging retired people inventing the future with MaKey MaKey , 2014, CHI.

[10]  Harry J. P. Timmermans,et al.  Travelers' Need for Information in Traffic and Transit: Results from a Web Survey , 2007, J. Intell. Transp. Syst..

[11]  John Zimmerman,et al.  Swarthmore College , 2012 .

[12]  I. Nonaka,et al.  How Japanese Companies Create the Dynamics of Innovation , 1995 .

[13]  Sonja Marjanovic,et al.  Crowdsourcing based business models: In search of evidence for innovation 2.0 , 2012 .

[14]  Jeremy V. Pitt,et al.  Using Social Networks for Exchanging Valuable Real Time Public Transport Information among Travellers , 2011, 2011 IEEE 13th Conference on Commerce and Enterprise Computing.

[15]  Chris Cluett,et al.  e-Transit: Electronic Business Strategies for Public Transportation. Volume 8: Improving Public Transportation Technology Implementations and Anticipating Emerging Technologies , 2007 .

[16]  Alan Borning,et al.  OneBusAway: results from providing real-time arrival information for public transit , 2010, CHI.

[17]  Tor Skoglund,et al.  Appreciated–but with a Fading Grace of Novelty! Traveller's Assessment of, Usage of and Behavioural Change given Access to a Co-modal Travel Planner , 2012 .

[18]  Stephen Ison,et al.  Examining the Political and Practical Reality of Bus-based Real Time Passenger Information , 2007 .

[19]  Patrícia C. A. R. Tedesco,et al.  The UbiBus Project: Using Context and Ubiquitous Computing to build Advanced Public Transportation Systems to Support Bus Passengers , 2012, SBSI.

[20]  H. Simon,et al.  ON A CLASS OF SKEW DISTRIBUTION FUNCTIONS , 1955 .

[21]  M. Dicke-Ogenia,et al.  Reducing Uncertainty and Supporting Cognitive Maps in Travel Information for Public Transport , 2010 .

[22]  Karl Kottenhoff,et al.  Dynamic at-stop real-time information displays for public transport: effects on customers , 2007 .

[23]  Grantham K. H. Pang,et al.  Adaptive route selection for dynamic route guidance system based on fuzzy-neural approaches , 1995 .

[24]  Rui Sun,et al.  The Analysis of Behavioral Responses to Transit Information , 2012 .

[25]  J. Grand Motivation, Agency, and Public Policy: Of Knights and Knaves, Pawns and Queens , 2003 .

[26]  Alan Borning,et al.  Where Is My Bus? Impact of mobile real-time information on the perceived and actual wait time of transit riders , 2011 .

[27]  Piet Rietveld,et al.  The Desired Quality of Integrated Multimodal Travel Information in Public Transport: Customer Needs for Time and Effort Savings , 2007 .

[28]  Arja Kuusisto,et al.  Customer Role in Service Production and Innovation – Looking for Directions for Future Research , 2008 .

[29]  Glenn Lyons,et al.  The UK public transport industry and provision of multi-modal traveller information , 2002 .

[30]  Lei Tang,et al.  Ridership effects of real-time bus information system: A case study in the City of Chicago , 2012 .

[31]  John D. Nelson,et al.  The impact of the application of new technology on public transport service provision and the passenger experience: A focus on implementation in Australia , 2013 .

[32]  Stefano Gori,et al.  ROUTE CHOICE BEHAVIOURAL MODELS ANALYSIS OF A ROUTE GUIDANCE SYSTEM FOR A CONGESTED URBAN AREA, II , 1992 .

[33]  Mahmoud Reza Delavar,et al.  Multi-criteria, personalized route planning using quantifier-guided ordered weighted averaging operators , 2011, Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinformation.

[34]  Mohamed Abdel-Aty,et al.  Using ordered probit modeling to study the effect of ATIS on transit ridership , 2001 .