Three-dimensional printed millifluidic devices for zebrafish embryo tests.

Implementations of Lab-on-a-Chip technologies for in-situ analysis of small model organisms and embryos (both invertebrate and vertebrate) are attracting an increasing interest. A significant hurdle to widespread applications of microfluidic and millifluidic devices for in-situ analysis of small model organisms is the access to expensive clean room facilities and complex microfabrication technologies. Furthermore, these resources require significant investments and engineering know-how. For example, poly(dimethylsiloxane) soft lithography is still largely unattainable to the gross majority of biomedical laboratories willing to pursue development of chip-based platforms. They often turn instead to readily available but inferior classical solutions. We refer to this phenomenon as workshop-to-bench gap of bioengineering science. To tackle the above issues, we examined the capabilities of commercially available Multi-Jet Modelling (MJM) and Stereolithography (SLA) systems for low volume fabrication of optical-grade millifluidic devices designed for culture and biotests performed on millimetre-sized specimens such as zebrafish embryos. The selected 3D printing technologies spanned a range from affordable personal desktop systems to high-end professional printers. The main motivation of our work was to pave the way for off-the-shelf and user-friendly 3D printing methods in order to rapidly and inexpensively build optical-grade millifluidic devices for customized studies on small model organisms. Compared with other rapid prototyping technologies such as soft lithography and infrared laser micromachining in poly(methyl methacrylate), we demonstrate that selected SLA technologies can achieve user-friendly and rapid production of prototypes, superior feature reproduction quality, and comparable levels of optical transparency. A caution need to be, however, exercised as majority of tested SLA and MJM resins were found toxic and caused significant developmental abnormalities in zebrafish embryos. Taken together, our data demonstrate that SLA technologies can be used for rapid and accurate production of devices for biomedical research. However, polymer biotoxicity needs to be carefully evaluated.

[1]  Donald Wlodkowic,et al.  Toward embedded laboratory automation for smart Lab-on-a-Chip embryo arrays. , 2013, Biosensors & bioelectronics.

[2]  Lucia L. Prieto-Godino,et al.  Open Labware: 3-D Printing Your Own Lab Equipment , 2015, PLoS biology.

[3]  G. Whitesides,et al.  Applications of microfluidics in chemical biology. , 2006, Current opinion in chemical biology.

[4]  Richard van Noort,et al.  The future of dental devices is digital. , 2012 .

[5]  Donald Wlodkowic,et al.  Fishing on chips: Up‐and‐coming technological advances in analysis of zebrafish and Xenopus embryos , 2014, Cytometry. Part A : the journal of the International Society for Analytical Cytology.

[6]  G. Whitesides,et al.  Microfluidic devices fabricated in Poly(dimethylsiloxane) for biological studies , 2003, Electrophoresis.

[7]  Donald Wlodkowic,et al.  Advances in three-dimensional rapid prototyping of microfluidic devices for biological applications , 2014 .

[8]  Donald Wlodkowic,et al.  Successes and future outlook for microfluidics-based cardiovascular drug discovery , 2015, Expert opinion on drug discovery.

[9]  Xiaoyu Tian,et al.  A brief review of dispensing-based rapid prototyping techniques in tissue scaffold fabrication: role of modeling on scaffold properties prediction , 2009, Biofabrication.

[10]  Philip J. Kitson,et al.  Configurable 3D-Printed millifluidic and microfluidic 'lab on a chip' reactionware devices. , 2012, Lab on a chip.

[11]  Aliaa I. Shallan,et al.  Cost-effective three-dimensional printing of visibly transparent microchips within minutes. , 2014, Analytical chemistry.

[12]  Albert Folch,et al.  Mail-order microfluidics: evaluation of stereolithography for the production of microfluidic devices. , 2014, Lab on a chip.

[13]  Vamsi K. Yadavalli,et al.  Surface modification of fused deposition modeling ABS to enable rapid prototyping of biomedical microdevices , 2013 .

[14]  A. Woolley,et al.  3D printed microfluidic devices with integrated valves. , 2015, Biomicrofluidics.

[15]  Guha Manogharan,et al.  Making sense of 3-D printing: Creating a map of additive manufacturing products and services , 2014 .

[16]  Donald Wlodkowic,et al.  Wormometry‐on‐a‐chip: Innovative technologies for in situ analysis of small multicellular organisms , 2011, Cytometry. Part A : the journal of the International Society for Analytical Cytology.

[17]  Dino Di Carlo,et al.  Research highlights: printing the future of microfabrication. , 2014, Lab on a chip.

[18]  Po Ki Yuen,et al.  SmartBuild-a truly plug-n-play modular microfluidic system. , 2008, Lab on a chip.

[19]  Donald Wlodkowic,et al.  Biological implications of polymeric microdevices for live cell assays. , 2009, Analytical chemistry.

[20]  Andrés Díaz Lantada,et al.  Rapid prototyping for biomedical engineering: current capabilities and challenges. , 2012, Annual review of biomedical engineering.

[21]  G. Whitesides The origins and the future of microfluidics , 2006, Nature.

[22]  Donald Wlodkowic,et al.  Miniaturized Embryo Array for Automated Trapping, Immobilization and Microperfusion of Zebrafish Embryos , 2012, PloS one.

[23]  Anja Haase,et al.  Functional polymers by two-photon 3D lithography , 2007 .

[24]  Holger Becker,et al.  Hype, hope and hubris: the quest for the killer application in microfluidics. , 2009, Lab on a chip.

[25]  Bastian E. Rapp,et al.  Let there be chip—towards rapid prototyping of microfluidic devices: one-step manufacturing processes , 2011 .

[26]  Donald Wlodkowic,et al.  Immunology on chip: promises and opportunities. , 2014, Biotechnology advances.

[27]  Kathryn E. Crosier,et al.  Integrated chip‐based physiometer for automated fish embryo toxicity biotests in pharmaceutical screening and ecotoxicology , 2014, Cytometry. Part A : the journal of the International Society for Analytical Cytology.

[28]  T. Braunbeck,et al.  Is the fish embryo toxicity test (FET) with the zebrafish (Danio rerio) a potential alternative for the fish acute toxicity test? , 2009, Comparative biochemistry and physiology. Toxicology & pharmacology : CBP.